The Role of Formative Assessment in a Blended Learning Course

Conference paper
Part of the Communications in Computer and Information Science book series (CCIS, volume 653)


Assessing the effectiveness of a course design in higher education is an almost unfeasible task. The practical inability to conduct randomised controlled trials in a natural setting limits teachers who want to interpret their design choices to non causal evaluation. With at least a moderate amount of common sense these evaluations could be useful in gathering insight into what works and what does not work in education. In our blended learning course we wanted to assess the role of formative assessment while also taking lecture attendance into account. There are certainly many confounds for which we cannot control. We found no effect of lecture attendance but formative assessments did predict a substantial amount of course outcome. This was probably due to not including the formative performance in the final grading and our emphasis in the course that to err is to be student. The validity of the formative assessment paves the way for diagnostic use and remedial teaching.


Formative assessment Blended learning Lecture attendance Weblectures 


  1. 1.
    Black, P., Wiliam, D.: Developing the theory of formative assessment. Educ. Assess. Eval. Account. 21(1), 5–31 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bos, N., Groeneveld, C., Bruggen van, J Brand-Gruwel, S.: The use of recorded lectures in education and the impact on lecture attendance and exam performance. Br. J. Educ. Technol. (2015)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dweck, C.S.: Self-theories: Their Role in Motivation Personality and Development. Psychology Press, Philadelphia (2000)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Freeman, S., Eddy, S.L., Mcdonough, E., Mcdonough, M., Smith, M.K., Okoroafor, N., Jordt, H., Wenderoth, M.: Active learning increases student performance in science, engineering, and mathematics. In: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America (2014)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    R. Core Team: R: a language and environment for statistical computing (2016)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Tversky, A., Kahneman, D.: The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice. Science 211, 453–458 (1981)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of AmsterdamAmsterdamThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations