Advertisement

Multicriteria Decision Making for Healthcare Facilities Location with Visualization Based on FITradeoff Method

  • Marta Dell’Ovo
  • Eduarda Asfora Frej
  • Alessandra Oppio
  • Stefano Capolongo
  • Danielle Costa Morais
  • Adiel Teixeira de Almeida
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Business Information Processing book series (LNBIP, volume 282)

Abstract

This paper proposes an application of the Flexible Interactive Tradeoff (FITradeoff) method for siting healthcare facilities. The selection of the location of complex facilities, as hospitals, can be considered as a multidimensional decision problem for the several issues to be taken into account and, moreover, for the variety of stakeholders that should be involved. The case study under investigation is the location of “La Città della Salute”, a new large healthcare facility in Lombardy Region (Italy). Starting from a cross disciplinary literature review, a multidimensional evaluation framework has been defined and applied to the case study by considering the point of view of one Decision Maker (DM). The application shows that a smaller effort is required from the DM using the FITradeoff method.

Keywords

Healthcare facility location MCDM FITradeoff Decision-making Visualization 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This study was partially sponsored by the Brazilian Research Council (CNPq) for which the authors are most grateful.

References

  1. 1.
    Keeney, R.L.: Make better decision makers. Decis. Anal. 1(4), 193–204 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sharifi, M.A., Rodriguez, E.: Design and development of a planning support system for policy formulation in water resource rehabilitation. J. Hydroinformatics 4(3), 157–175 (2002)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Capolongo, S., Buffoli, M., Oppio, A.: How to assess the effects of urban plans on environment and health. Territorio 73, 145–151 (2015)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Daskin, M.S., Dean, L.K.: Location of Health Care Facilities, pp. 43–76. Kluwer Academic Publisher, Boston (2004)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Burkey, M.L., Bhadury, J., Eiselt, H.A.: A location-based comparison of health care services in four U.S. states with efficiency and equity. Socio-Econ. Plan. Sci. 46, 157–163 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Noon, C.E., Hankins, C.T.: Spatial data visualization in healthcare: supporting a facility location decision via gis-based market analysis. In: 34th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (2001)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Murad, A.A.: Using GIS for planning public general hospitals at Jeddah City. Environ. Des. Sci. 3, 3–22 (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Vahidnia, M.H., Alesheikh, A.A., Alimohammadi, A.: Hospital site selection using fuzzy AHP and its derivatives. J. Environ. Manag. 90, 3048–3056 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Soltani, A., Marandi, E.Z.: Hospital site selection using two-stage fuzzy multi-criteria decision making process. J. Urban Environ. Eng. 5, 2–43 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Wu, C.R., Lin, C.T., Chen, H.C.: Optimal selection of location for Taiwanese hospitals to ensure a competitive advantage by using the analytic hierarchy process and sensitivity analysis. Build. Environ. 42, 1431–1444 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Faruque, L.I., Ayyalasomayajula, B., Pelletier, R., Klarenbach, S., Hemmelgarn, B.R., Tonelli, M.: Spatial analysis to locate new clinics for diabetic kidney patients in the underserved communities in Alberta. Nephrol. Dial. Transplant. 27, 4102–4109 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chiu, J.E., Tsai, H.H.: Applying analytic hierarchy process to select optimal expansion of hospital location. In: 10th International Conference on Service Systems and Service Management, pp. 603–606 (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Abdullahi, S., Mahmud, A.R., Pradhan, B.: Spatial modelling of site suitability assessment for hospitals using geographical information system-based multicriteria approach at Qazvin city. Iran Geocarto Int. 29, 164–184 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Lee, K.S., Moon, K.J.: Hospital distribution in a metropolitan city: assessment by a geographical information system grid modelling approach. Geospatial Health 8, 537–544 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Beheshtifar, S., Alimoahmmadi, A.: A multiobjective optimization approach for location-allocation of clinics. Int. Trans. Oper. Res. 22, 313–328 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Zhang, P., Ren, X., Zhang, Q., He, J., Chen, Y.: Spatial analysis of rural medical facilities using huff model: a case study of Lankao county, Henan province. Int. J. Smart Home 9, 161–168 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Du, G., Sun, C.: Location planning problem of service centers for sustainable home healthcare: evidence from the empirical analysis of Shanghai. Sustainability 7, 15812–15832 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kim, J.I., Senaratna, D.M., Ruza, J., Kam, C., Ng, S.: Feasibility study on an evidence-based decision-support system for hospital site selection for an aging population. Sustainability 7, 2730–2744 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Riabacke, M., Danielson, M., Ekenberg, L.: State-of-the-art prescriptive criteria weight elicitation. Adv. Decis. Sci. 2012, 1–24 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Keeney, R.L., Raiffa, H.: Decision Analysis with Multiple Conflicting Objectives. Wiley & Sons, New York (1976)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Weber, M., Borcheding, K.: Behavioral influences on weight judgments in multiattribute decision making. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 67(1), 1–12 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Edwards, W., Barron, F.H.: SMARTS and SMARTER: improved simple methods for multiattribute utility measurement. Organ. Behav. Hum. Decis. Process. 60, 306–325 (1994)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Borcherding, K., Eppel, T., Von Winterfeldt, D.: Comparison of weighting judgments in multiattribute utility measurement. Manag. Sci. 37(12), 1603–1619 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    de Almeida, A.T., Almeida, J.A., Costa, A.P.C.S., Almeida-Filho, A.T.: A new method for elicitation of criteria weights in additive models: flexible and interactive tradeoff. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 250(1), 179–191 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Oppio, A., Buffoli, M., Dell’Ovo, M., Capolongo, S.: Addressing decisions about new hospitals’ siting: a multidimensional evaluation approach. Ann. Ist. Super Sanità 52(1), 78–87 (2016)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    D’Alessandro, D., Buffoli, M., Capasso, L., Fara, G.M., Rebecchi, A., Capolongo, S.: Green areas and public health improving wellbeing and physical activity in the urban context. Epidemiol Prev. 39(5 Suppl 1), 8–13 (2015)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dente, B.: Understanding Policy Decisions. SpringerBriefs in Applied Sciences and Technology, PoliMI SpringerBriefs. Springer, New York (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Dell’Ovo, M., Capolongo, S.: Architectures for health: between historical contexts and suburban areas. Tool to support location strategies. Techne 12, 269–276 (2016)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marta Dell’Ovo
    • 1
  • Eduarda Asfora Frej
    • 2
  • Alessandra Oppio
    • 3
  • Stefano Capolongo
    • 1
  • Danielle Costa Morais
    • 2
  • Adiel Teixeira de Almeida
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Architecture, Built Environment and Construction EngineeringPolitecnico di MilanoMilanItaly
  2. 2.Center for Decision Systems and Information Development – CDSIDFederal University of Pernambuco – UFPERecifeBrazil
  3. 3.Department of Architecture and Urban StudiesPolitecnico di MilanoMilanItaly

Personalised recommendations