Visualization of Environment-related Information in Augmented Reality: Analysis of User Needs

  • Kateřina Chmelařová
  • Čeněk Šašinka
  • Zdeněk Stachoň
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography book series (LNGC)


The main motivation for this study was to enable paragliding pilots to use Augmented Reality features during flight. For orientation in the air, paragliding pilots use a map as the main source of information. It is therefore important that the information is presented in the most easily accessible way. The aim of the present study was to investigate the needs of paragliding pilots with respect to maps and the way maps provide them with information about the environment. The participants were three professional paragliding instructors with different amounts of experience. The methods employed involved a semi-structured interview and a practical, real-flight test involving AR glasses; the test was done by only one of the pilots. Two categories of data were identified, with the first involving data related to geographical terrain and the other to the pilot’s immediate surroundings. Our results suggest that an optical see-through display would be more suitable for use in the air than the video-based glasses we utilized. If an optical see-through display were used, the terrain could be seen through the glasses, with terrain-related information displayed in the map. AR could be used to present flight-related information as well. Our findings suggest that the way in which information is presented to pilots should be chosen based on the category of the information, namely, whether it is terrain-related or flight-related. In addition, it was found that the small display in the right corner of the pilot’s field of view is rather distractive and insufficient to fulfill the pilots’ needs. Our results also showed that future AR applications should be designed to be transferable between different platforms: glasses, mobile phones, and tablets.


Augmented reality Human-computer interaction User test Map-related information Paragliding Optical see-through display 



This research has been supported by funding from the project of Masaryk University under the grant agreement No. MUNI/M/0846/2015, ‘Influence of Cartographic Visualization Methods on the Success of Solving Practical and Educational Spatial Tasks’. We gratefully acknowledge the support and willingness of Dalibor Carbol and his paragliding school El Speedo s.r.o. without which the present study could not have been completed.


  1. Azuma, R. T. (1997). A survey of augmented reality. Presence: Teleoperators and Virtual Environments, 6(4), 355–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barbour, N., & Schmidt, G. (2001). Inertial sensor technology trends. IEEE Sensors Journal, 1(4), 332–339. Retrieved October 17, 2016, from
  3. Behzadan, A. H., Dong, S., & Kamat, V. R. (2015). Augmented reality visualization: A review of civil infrastucture system applications. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 29(2), 252–267.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bichler, S., Ogris, G., Kremser, V., Schwab, F., Knott, S., & Baca, A. (2012). Towards high-precision IMU/GPS-based stride/parameter determination in a outdoor runners’ scenario. Procedia Engineering, 34, 592–597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Billinghurst, M., & Kato, H. (1999, March). Collaborative mixed reality. In Proceedings of the International Symposium on Mixed Reality (pp. 261–284). Retrieved October 20, 2016, from
  6. Billinghurst, M., Clark, A., & Lee, G. (2015). A survey of augmented reality. Foundations and Trends® Human–Computer Interaction, 8(2–3), 73–272.Google Scholar
  7. Chung, J., Pagnini, F., & Langer, E. (2016). Mindful navigation for pedestrians: Improving engagement with augmented reality. Technology in Society, 45, 29–33. Retrieved October 20, 2016, from
  8. Elarebi, T., Suprem, A., & Deep, V. (2016). Orientation and displacement detection for smartphone device based IMUs. IEEE Access. Retrieved October 17, 2016, from
  9. Ellis, C. A., Gibbs, S. J., & Rein, G. (1991). Groupware: some issues and experiences. Communications of the ACM, 34(1), 39–58. Retrieved October 10, 2016, from
  10. Fajnerova, et al., (2016). Human cognitive enhancement tested in virtual reality environments. In Proceedings of the 11 th International Conference on Disability, Virtual Reality and Associated Technologies, Los Angeles, California, USA, 20–22 September 2016. Retrieved February 02, 2017, from
  11. Höllerer, T., Feiner, S., Terauchi, T., Rashid, G., & Hallaway, D. (1999). Exploring MARS: Developing indoor and outdoor user interfaces to a mobile augmented reality system. Computers and Graphics, 23(6), 779–785. Retrieved October 17, 2016, from
  12. Kamilakis, M., Gavalas, D., & Zaroliagis, C. (2016, June). Mobile user experience in augmented reality vs. maps interfaces: A case study in public transportation. In International Conference on Augmented Reality, Virtual Reality and Computer Graphics (pp. 388–396). Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. Kraak, J. M., & Brown, A. (Eds.). (2003). Web cartography. CRC Press.Google Scholar
  14. Larkin, J. H., & Simon, H. A. (1987). Why a diagram is (sometimes) worth ten thousand words. Cognitive Science, 11(1), 65–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Poelman, R., Akman, O., Lukosch, S., & Jonker, P. (2012, February). As if being there: mediated reality for crime scene investigation. In Proceedings of the ACM 2012 Conference on Computer Supported Cooperative Work (pp. 1267–1276). ACM. Retrieved October 10, 2016, from

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kateřina Chmelařová
    • 1
  • Čeněk Šašinka
    • 1
  • Zdeněk Stachoň
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyCenter for Experimental Psychology and Cognitive Sciences, Masaryk UniversityBrnoCzech Republic
  2. 2.Laboratory of Geoinformatics and Cartography, Department of GeographyMasaryk UniversityBrnoCzech Republic

Personalised recommendations