Advertisement

Characterizing Maps from Visual Properties

  • Catherine Dominguès
  • Laurence Jolivet
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Geoinformation and Cartography book series (LNGC)

Abstract

Customized mapping needs to rely on a strategy to help mapmakers in designing their maps. Our approach is based on analogy between existing sample maps and the wished customized map. The challenge consists in being able to offer the appropriate maps according to each mapmaker’s specifications. We have focused on the perception of seven selected visual properties of maps. To qualify this perception, a user test was set up. A sample map database was built in order to collect assessment of participants about visual properties. Test results were investigated through property and by statistical features. Analyses show that among properties, some are scored as more extreme and/or unanimous than others. Correlations between properties were also highlighted, which clarifies the characterization of sample maps. We then suggested a way to discover the database in a custom-made map process by using relevant queries based on statistical features of properties. Recommendations on exploiting a sample map database are finally formulated.

Keywords

Custom-made map Visual property Color Visual property statistical feature User test 

References

  1. Bertin, J. (1983). Semiology of graphics. Diagrams, networks, maps (trans.: Berg, W. J.). Madison, Wis.: University of Wisconsin Press.Google Scholar
  2. Brewer, C. A., Hatchard, G. W., & Harrower, M. A. (2003). ColorBrewer in print: A catalog of color schemes for maps. Cartography and Geographic Information Science, 30(1), 5–32.Google Scholar
  3. Christophe, S. (2012). Cartographic styles between traditional and original (towards a cartographic style model). In Proceedings of AutoCarto 2012, Colombus, Ohio, USA, September 16–18.Google Scholar
  4. Christophe, S., & Hoarau, C. (2012). Expressive map design based on pop art: Revisit of graphic semiology? Cartographic Perspectives, 73, 61–74.Google Scholar
  5. Demaj, D., & Field, K. (2012). Reasserting design relevance in cartography: Some examples. The Cartographic Journal, 49(1), 77–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dominguès, C. (2008). Description de cartes géographiques. In Proceedings of EGC 2008, 8èmes journées francophones “Extraction et Gestion des Connaissances”—Workshop on “User modeling and Web interface customization”, Sophia-Antipolis, France, January 29–February 1 (pp. 59–68).Google Scholar
  7. Dominguès, C., & Kharchi, T. (2013). Map classification according to their visual global properties. In Proceedings of ICC 2013, Dresden, Germany, August 25–30.Google Scholar
  8. Field, K., & Demaj, D. (2012). Reasserting design relevance in cartography: Some concepts. The Cartographic Journal, 49(1), 70–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Forrest, D., & Kinninment, E. (2001). Experiments in the design of 1:100 000 scale topographic mapping for Great Britain. The Cartographic Journal, 38(1), 25–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hinz, A., Michalski, D., Schwarz, R., & Herzberg, P. Y. (2007). The acquiescence effect in responding to a questionnaire. GMS Psycho-Social-Medicine, 4. Retrieved June 20, 2007, from https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2736523/.
  11. Itten, J. (1985). Art de la couleur. Réédition en 2004. Dessain et Tolra.Google Scholar
  12. Jolivet, L. (2009). Characterizing maps to improve on-demand cartography—The example of European topographic maps. In Proceedings of 17th Conference on GIScience and Research in UK (GISRUK’09), Durham, UK, April 1–3.Google Scholar
  13. Keates, J. S. (1984). The cartographic art. Cartographica, Monograph, 31, 37–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Keates, J. S. (1996). Understanding maps (2nd ed.). Harlow: Longman.Google Scholar
  15. Kent, A. J. (2005). Aesthetics: A lost cause in cartographic theory? The Cartographic Journal, 42(2), 182–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kent, A. (2009). Stylistic diversity in European state 1:50 000 topographic maps. The Cartographic Journal, 46(3), 179–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kent, A. J., & Vujakovic, P. (2011). Cartographic language: Towards a new paradigm for understanding stylistic diversity in topographic maps. The Cartographic Journal, 48(1), 21–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Krygier, J. B. (1995). Cartography as an art and a science? Cartographic Journal, 32(6), 3–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Neumann, L., & Neumann, A. (2005). Style transfer techniques using hue, lightness and saturation histogram matching. In Proceedings of Computational Aesthetics in Graphics, Visualization and Imaging, Girona, Spain (pp. 111–122).Google Scholar
  20. Ory, J., Christophe, S., Fabrikant, S. I., & Bucher, B. (2015). How do map readers recognize a topographic mapping style? The Cartographic Journal, 52(2), 193–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pickle, L. W. (2003). Usability testing of map designs. In Proceedings of the 35th Symposium on the Interface, Salt Lake City, USA, March 12–15.Google Scholar
  22. Piket, J. J. C. (1972). Five European topographic maps: A contribution to the classification of topographic maps and their relation to other map types. Geografisch Tijdschrift, 6, 266–276.Google Scholar
  23. Robinson, A. H., Morrison, J. L., Muehrcke, P. C., Kimerling, A. J., & Guptill, S. C. (1995). Elements of cartography. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  24. Sawahata, L. (2001). Color harmony workbook: A workbook and guide to creative color creations. Rockport Publishers.Google Scholar
  25. Slocum, T. A., McMaster, R. B., Kessler, F. C., & Howard, H. H. (1999). Thematic cartography and geovisualization (3rd ed.). Pearson.Google Scholar
  26. Van Elzakker, C. P. J. M., & Griffin, A. L. (2013). Focus on geoinformation users. GIM International, 27, 20–23.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institut national de l’information géographique et forestièreSaint-MandéFrance

Personalised recommendations