Advertisement

Religion and Its Cultural Evolutionary By-products

  • Kristin LaurinEmail author
Chapter

Abstract

In this chapter I provide a cultural evolutionary perspective on one of the most prevalent kind of lay beliefs: Religion, and more specifically the belief in Big Gods: powerful, watchful, morally concerned deities. In the first part of the chapter, I summarize current thinking about the cultural evolutionary origins of these beliefs. According to the cultural evolution hypothesis, religion as a whole, and Big God beliefs in particular, emerged because cultures that promoted them were able to grow and thrive better than those that did not. More specifically, the three characteristics of Big Gods—watchfulness, power, and moral concern—make them ideal for helping enforce cooperation in large groups of human beings. In the second part of the chapter, I describe by-products of these God beliefs: Effects that these beliefs have that are separate from their initial adaptive function of promoting cooperation. In particular, I explore their consequences for self-regulation, risk-taking, relationships, and human-led enforcement of prosocial norms. I end by tracing the path toward understanding and predicting the continued evolution of religious beliefs.

Keywords

Religion Belief in god Cultural evolution Self-regulation Prosocial punishment Risk taking Relationships 

References

  1. Alicke, M. D. (1985). Global self-evaluation as determined by the desirability and controllability of trait adjectives. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 49(6), 1621–1630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arkin, R. M., & Baumgardner, A. H. (1986). Self-presentation and self-evaluation: Processes of self-control and social control. In R. M. Baumeister (Ed.), Public self and private self (pp. 75–97). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atran, S., & Norenzayan, A. (2004). Religion’s evolutionary landscape: Counterintuition, commitment, compassion, communion. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 27(6), 713–770.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldwin, M. W., & Holmes, J. G. (1987). Salient private audiences and awareness of the self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 52(6), 1087–1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.Google Scholar
  6. Barkley, R. A. (1997). Behavioral inhibition, sustained attention, and executive functions: Constructing a unifying theory of ADHD. Psychological Bulletin, 121(1), 65–94.Google Scholar
  7. Barclay, P. (2006). Reputational benefits for altruistic punishment. Evolution and Human Behavior, 27(5), 325–344.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Barrett, J. L. (2000). Exploring the natural foundations of religion. Trends in Cognitive Science, 4(1), 29–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barrett, J. L., & Keil, F. C. (1996). Conceptualizing a non-natural entity: Antrhopomorphism in God concepts. Cognitive Psychology, 31(3), 219–247.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Baumeister, R. F. (1982). A self-presentational view of social phenomena. Psychological Bulletin, 91(1), 3–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Be’ery, G., & Bloom, P. B.-N. (2015). God and the welfare state—substitutes or complements? An experimental test of the effect of belief in God’s control. PloS ONE, 10(6), e1238858.Google Scholar
  12. Bock, W. J. (2000). Explanatory history of the origin of feathers. American Zoologist, 40(4), 478–485.Google Scholar
  13. Botero, C. A., Gardner, B., Kirby, K. R., Bulbulia, J., Gavin, M. C., & Gray, R. D. (2014). The ecology of religious beliefs. PNAS, 111(47), 16784–16789.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. Boyer, P. (2001). Religion explained: The evolutionary origins of religious thought. New York, NY: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  15. Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1985). Culture and the evolutionary process. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  16. Boyd, R., & Richerson, P. J. (1988). The evolution of reciprocity in sizable groups. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 132(3), 337–356.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Brown, J. D. (1986). Evaluations of self and others: Self-enhancement biases in social judgments. Social Cognition, 4(4), 353–376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Brown, J. D. (2007). The self. New York, NY: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  19. Buss, D. M., Haselton, M. G., Shackelford, T. K., Bleske, A. L., & Wakefield, J. C. (1998). Adaptations, exaptations, and spandrels. American Psychologist, 53(5), 533–548.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Carter, E. C., McCullough, M. E., & Carver, C. S. (2012). The mediating role of monitoring in the association of religion with self-control. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(6), 691–697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (1998). On the self-regulation of behavior. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Carver, C. S., & Scheier, M. F. (2011). Self-regulation of action and affect. In K. D. Vohs & R. F. Baumeister (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, and applications (2nd ed., pp. 3–21). New York, NY: Guilford.Google Scholar
  23. Cavalli-Sforza, L., & Feldman, M. (1981). Cultural transmission and evolution: A quantitative approach. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Chae, B. G., & Zhu, R. J. (2014). Environmental disorder leads to self-regulatory failure. Journal of Consumer Research, 40(6), 1203–1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Chudek, M., Brosseau-Liard, P. E., Birch, S., & Henrich, J. (2013). Culture-gene coevolutionary theory and children’s selective social learning. In M. R. Banaji & S. A. Gelman (Eds.), Navigating the social world: What infants, children, and other species can teach us (pp. 181–185). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Chudek, M., & Henrich, J. (2011). Culture-gene coevolution, norm-psychology and the emergence of human prosociality. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(5), 218–226.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Dahl, D. W., Manchanda, R. V., & Argo, J. J. (2001). Embarrassment in consumer purchase: The roles of social presence and purchase familiarity. Journal of Consumer Research, 28(3), 473–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Darwin, C. (1877/2004). The descent of man, second edition, with an introduction by Adrian Desmond and James Moore. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  29. de Waal, F. (2008). Putting the altruism back into altruism: The evolution of empathy. Annual Review of Psychology, 59(1), 279–300.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Dijksterhuis, A., Preston, J., Wegner, D. M., & Aarts, H. (2008). Effects of subliminal priming of self and God on self-attribution of authorship for events. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 44(1), 2–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Dunbar, R. I. M. (2003). Evolution of the social brain. Science, 302(5648), 1160–1161.Google Scholar
  32. Dunning, D., Heath, C., & Suls, J. M. (2004). Flawed self-assessment: Implications for health, education, and the workplace. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 5(3), 69–106.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Eitam, B., & Higgins, E. T. (2010). Motivation in mental accessibility: Relevance of a representation (ROAR) as a new framework. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 4(10), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Evans, E. M. (2001). Cognitive and contextual factors in the emergence of diverse belief systems: Creation versus evolution. Cognitive Psychology, 42(3), 217–266.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Exline, J. J., & Rose, E. (2005). Religious and spiritual struggles. In R. F. Paloutzian & C. L. Park (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of religion and spirituality (pp. 315–330). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  36. Exline, J. J., Yali, A. M., & Lobel, M. (1999). When God disappoints: Difficulty forgiving God and its role in negative emotion. Journal of Health Psychology, 4(3), 365–379.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2000). Cooperation and punishment in public goods experiments. American Economic Review, 90(4), 980–994.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fehr, E., & Gächter, S. (2002). Altruistic punishment in humans. Nature, 415(6868), 137–140.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Gervais, W. M., & Norenzayan, A. (2012). Like a camera in the sky? Thinking about god increases public self-awareness and socially desirable responding. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48(1), 298–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Granqvist, P., Mikulincer, M., & Shaver, P. R. (2010). Religion as attachment: Normative processes and individual differences. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 49–59.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Gray, K., & Wegner, D. M. (2010). Blaming god for our pain: Human suffering and the divine mind. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 7–16.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Greenspan, S. (2006). How symbols, language, and intelligence evolved from early primates to modern humans. Cambridge, MA: Da Capo Press.Google Scholar
  43. Henrich, J., Ensimger, J., McElreath, R., Barr, A., Barrett, C., Bolyanatz, A., et al. (2010). Markets, religion, community size, and the evolution of fairness and punishment. Science, 327(5972), 1480–1484.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Henrich, N., & Henrich, J. (2007). Why humans cooperate: A cultural and evolutionary explanation. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Hitsch, G. J., Hortacsdu, A., & Ariely, D. (2010). Matching and sorting in online dating. American Economic Review, 100(1), 130–163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. James, W. (1880). Great men, great thoughts, and the environment. Atlantic Monthly, 46(276), 441–459.Google Scholar
  47. Kanfer, F. H., & Karoly, P. (1972). Self-control: A behavioristic excursion into the lion’s den. Behavioral Theory, 3(3), 398–416.Google Scholar
  48. Karau, S. J., & Williams, K. D. (1993). Social loafing: A meta-analytic review and theoretical integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65(4), 681–706.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kay, A. C., Gaucher, D., Napier, J. L., Callan, M. J., & Laurin, K. (2008). God and the Government: Testing a compensatory control mechanism for the support of external systems. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95(1), 18–35.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Kay, A. C., Laurin, K., Fitzsimons, G. M., & Landau, M. J. (2014). A functional basis for structure-seeking: Exposure to structure promotes willingness to engage in motivated action. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143(2), 486–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Khenfer, J., Laurin, K., Tafani, E., Roux, E., & Kay, A. C. (2016a). Here’s what you gotta do! Reminders of external agency affect motivational responses to savings advice in opposing directions. Manuscript under review.Google Scholar
  52. Khenfer, J., Tafani, E., Roux, E., & Laurin, K., (2016b). When God’s (not) needed: The divergent influence of belief in divine control on goal commitment. Manuscript under review.Google Scholar
  53. Kim-Spoon, J., Farley, J. P., Holmes, C., Longo, G. S., & McCullough, M. E. (2014). Processes linking parents’ and adolescents’ religiousness and adolescent substance use: Monitoring and self-control. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 43(5), 745–756.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Kirkpatrick, L. A. (1998). God as a substitute attachment figure: A longitudinal study of adult attachment style and religious change in college students. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 24(9), 961–973.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Kitchens, M. B. (2015). Thinking about God causes internal reflection in believers and unbelievers of God. Self and Identity, 14(6), 724–747.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kupor, D. M., Laurin, K., & Levav, J. (2015). Anticipating divine protection? Reminders of God can increase nonmoral risk taking. Psychological Science, 26(4), 374–384.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Landau, M. J., Kay, A. C., & Whitson, J. (2015). Compensatory control and the appeal of a structured world. Psychological Bulletin, 141(3), 694–722.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  58. Latané, B. (1981). The psychology of social impact. American Psychologist, 36(4), 343–356.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Laurin, K., Fitzsimons, G. M., & Kay, A. C. (2011). Social disadvantage and the self-regulatory function of justice beliefs. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(1), 149–171.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Laurin, K., & Kay, A. C. (2016). Religion and self-regulation: Integrating skills-based and motivation-based accounts. In K. D. Vohs & R. F. Baumeister (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation: Research, theory, & applications (pp 305–322). Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
  61. Laurin, K., Kay, A. C., & Fitzsimons, G. M. (2012a). Divergent effects of activating thoughts of God on self-regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102(1), 4–21.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Laurin, K., Schumann, K., & Holmes, J. G. (2014). A relationship with God? Connecting with the divine to assuage fears of interpersonal rejection. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(7), 777–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Laurin, K., Shariff, A. F., Henrich, J., & Kay, A. C. (2012b). Outsourcing punishment to God: Beliefs in divine control reduce earthly punishment. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 279(1741), 3272–3281.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  64. Lawrence, R. T. (1997). Measuring the image of God: The God image inventory and the God image scales. Journal of Psychology & Theology, 25(2), 214–226.Google Scholar
  65. Leary, M. R. (1995). Self-presentation: Impression management and interpersonal behavior. Boulder, CO: Westview.Google Scholar
  66. Lieberman, P. (1991). Uniquely human: The evolution of speech, thought, and selfless behavior. MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  67. Lumsden, C., & Wilson, E. O. (1981). Genes, mind and culture: The coevolutionary process. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  68. McCullough, M. E., & Willoughby, B. L. B. (2009). Religion, self-regulation, and self-control: Associations, explanations, and implications. Psychological Bulletin, 135(1), 69–93.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. McNamara, R. A., Norenzayan, A., & Henrich, J. (2016). Supernatural punishment, in-group biases, and material insecurity: Experiments and ethnography from Yasawa, Fiji. Religion, Brain, and Behavior, 6(1), 34–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Meijers, M. H. C., & Rutjens, B. T. (2014). Affirming belief in scientific progress reduces environmentally friendly behavior. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(5), 487–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Mikalson, J. (2010). Ancient Greek religion. Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  72. Muraven, M., & Baumeister, R. F. (2000). Self-regulation and depletion of limited resources: Does self-control resemble a muscle? Psychological Bulletin, 126(2), 247–259.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  73. Murray, S. L., Derrick, J. L., Leder, S., & Holmes, J. G. (2008). Balancing connectedness and self-protection goals in close relationships: A levels-of-processing perspective on risk regulation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 94(3), 429–459.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  74. Murray, S. L., Holmes, J. G., & Collins, N. L. (2006). Optimizing assurance: The risk regulation system in relationships. Psychological Bulletin, 132(5), 641–666.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  75. Norenzayan, A. (2013). Big Gods: How religion transformed cooperation and conflict. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Norenzayan, A., & Atran, S. (2004). Cognitive and emotional processes in the cultural transmission of natural and nonnatural beliefs. In M. Schaller & C. Crandall (Eds.), The psychological foundations of culture (pp. 149–169). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  77. O’Gorman, R., Henrich, J., & Van Vugt, M. (2008). Constraining free riding in public good games: Designated solitary punishers can sustain human cooperation. Proceedings of the Royal Society B, 276(1655), 323–329.CrossRefPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  78. Panchanathan, K., & Boyd, R. (2003). A tale of two defectors: The importance of standing for the evolution of indirect reciprocity. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 224(1), 115–126.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  79. Pargament, K. I., Koenig, H. G., Tarakeshwar, N., & Hahn, J. (2001). Religious struggle as a predictor of mortality among medically ill elderly patients: A 2-year longitudinal study. Archives of Internal Medicine, 161(15), 1881–1885.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. Pargament, K. I., Zinnbauer, B. J., Scott, A. B., Butter, E. M., Zerowin, J., & Stanik, P. (1998). Red flags and religious coping: Identifying some religious warning signs among people in crisis. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 54(1), 77–89.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  81. Peoples, H. C., & Marlowe, F. W. (2012). Subsistence and the evolution of religion. Human Nature, 23(3), 253–269.Google Scholar
  82. Pew Research Center. (2012). Religiously unaffiliated. Retrieved from http://www.pewforum.org/2012/12/18/global-religious-landscape-unaffiliated/
  83. Pollner, M. (1989). Divine relations, social relations, and well-being. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 30(1), 92–104.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. Preston, J. L., & Ritter, R. S. (2013). Different effects of religion and God on prosociailty with the ingroup and the outgroup. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(11), 1471–1483.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  85. Purzycki, B. G., Finkel, D. N., Shaver, J., Wales, N., Cohen, A. B., & Sosis, R. (2012). What does God know? Supernatural agents’ access to socially strategic and nonstrategic information. Cognitive Science, 36(5), 846–869.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  86. Pyysiäinen, I. (2009). Supernatural agents: Why we believe in souls, Gods, and Buddhas. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Randolph-Seng, B., & Nielsen, M. E. (2007). Honesty: One effect of primed religious representations. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 17(4), 303–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Rives, J. (2007). Religion in the Roman Empire. Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  89. Roes, F. L., & Raymond, M. (2003). Belief in moralizing gods. Evolution and Human Behavior, 24(2), 126–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Saroglou, V. (2011). Believing, bonding, behaving, and belonging: The big four religious dimensions and cultural variation. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 42(8), 1320–1340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Schlenker, B. R. (1980). Impression management: The self-concept, social identity, and interpersonal relations. Monterey, CA: Brooks-Cole.Google Scholar
  92. Schlenker, B. R. (1986). Self-identification: Toward an integration of the private and public self (pp. 21–62). In R. F. Baumeister (Ed.), Public self and private self. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  93. Schvaneveldt, R. W., & Meyer, D. E. (1973). Retrieval and comparison processes in semantic memory (pp. 395–409). In S. Kornblum (Ed.), Attention and performance IV. New York, NY: Academic Pres,.Google Scholar
  94. Sedikides, C., Meek, R., Alicke, M. D., & Taylor, S. (2014). Behind bars but above the bar: Prisoners consider themselves more prosocial than non-prisoners. British Journal of Social Psychology, 53(2), 396–403.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. Shariff, A. F., & Norenzayan, A. (2007). God is watching you: Priming god concepts increases prosocial behavior in an anonymous economic game. Psychological Science, 18(9), 803–809.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  96. Shariff, A. F., & Norenzayan, A. (2011). Mean gods make good people: Different views of god predict cheating behavior. International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 21(2), 85–96.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Shariff, A. F., & Rhemtulla, M. (2012). Divergent effects of beliefs in heaven and hell on national crime rates. PLoS ONE, 7(6), e39048.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  98. Shariff, A. F., Willard, A. K., Andersen, T., & Norenzayan, A. (2016). Religious priming: A meta-analysis with a focus on religious prosociality. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 20(1), 27–48.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. Slingerland, E. (2013). Body and mind in early China: An integrated humanities-science approach. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 81(1), 6–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. Smith, R. J. (1996). Biology and body size in human evolution: Statistical inference misapplied. Current Anthropology, 37(3), 451–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Sumida, S. S., & Brochu, C. A. (2000). Phylogenetic context for the origin of feathers. American Zoologist, 40(4), 486–503.Google Scholar
  102. Vail, K. E., III, Adndt, J., & Abdollahi, A. (2012). Exploring the existential function of religion and supernatural agent beliefs among Christians, Muslims, atheists, and agnostics. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 38(10), 1288–1300.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  103. Vroom, V. H. (1964). Work and motivation. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  104. Waytz, A., & Young, L. (2016). Aversion to playing God: A key principle underlying moral judgment. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  105. Williams, T. N., Mwangi, T. W., Roberts, D. J., Alexander, N. D., Weatherall, D. J., Wambua, S., et al. (2005). An immune basis for malaria protection by the sickle cell trait. PLoS Medicine, 2(5), e128.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  106. Yilmaz, O., & Bahçekapili, H. G. (2016). Supernatural and secular monitors promote human cooperation only if they remind of punishment. Evolution and Human Behavior, 37(1), 79–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Zhong, C.-B., Bohns, V. K., & Gino, F. (2010). Good lamps are the best police: Darkness increases dishonesty and self-interested behavior. Psychological Science, 21(3), 311–314.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of British ColumbiaVancouverCanada

Personalised recommendations