Advertisement

Women’s Path to the Boardroom: The Case of Denmark

  • Aleksandra Gregorič
  • Jesper Lau Hansen
Chapter

Abstract

The representation of women in corporate directorships in Denmark has only been improving slowly over the last few years. Despite the slow progress at home and more active policies in neighboring countries and at the EU level, the Danish government has thus far resisted implementing board gender quotas. This chapter reviews the rules, trends and main debates surrounding board gender diversity in Denmark. We describe the main features of the country’s corporate governance system and overview the gender composition of Danish boards and the country’s efforts with regard to women’s representation in the top positions. We suggest that the low incidence of Danish women on boards is due to both the shortage of female candidates, especially women with leadership skills, as well as the persisting preferences of firms for “traditional” types of director characteristics and skills. We argue that further efforts in Denmark need to be directed toward facilitating women’s promotion to leadership positions, and also toward increasing firms’ (owners’) awareness of the benefits of gender-diverse boards.

References

  1. Cadbury Report. (1992). Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance, Report of the Committee on the Financial Aspects of Corporate Governance. Retrieved March 1, 2017 from http://www.ecgi.org/codes/documents/cadbury.pdf
  2. DJØF—The Danish association for graduates and students in law, business economics and political science. Retrieved March 1, 2017 from https://www.djoef.dk/omdjoef.aspx
  3. EC. (2013). European Commission: Country Profiles—Denmark. Retrieved March 1, 2017 from http://europa.eu/epic/countries/denmark/index_en.htm
  4. Global Gender Gap Report. (2016). Retrieved March 1, 2017 from http://reports.weforum.org/global-gender-gap-report-2016/
  5. Gregorič, A., & Poulsen, T. (2016). Understanding employee board representation: Empirical analysis using Danish linked employer-employee data. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  6. Gregorič, A., Poulsen, T., & Neville, M. (2014). Rapport til Erhvervsstyrelsen: Oktober 2013. Copenhagen: Erhvervs- og Selskabsstyrelsen.Google Scholar
  7. Gregorič, A., Rapp, M. S., & Sinani, E. (2016). Board-level employee representation and firms’ responses to crisis. Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
  8. Gregorič, A., Oxelheim, L., Randoy, T., & Thomsen, S. (2017). Resistance to change in the corporate elite: Female directors’ appointments onto Nordic boards. Journal of Business Ethics, 141, 267–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Lekvall, P. (2014). The Nordic corporate governance model. Stockholm: SNS Förlag.Google Scholar
  10. Skærbæk, M., & Heinskou, N. (2016, March 6). Der er kun kommet 0,9 pct. Flere kvinder i bestyrelser siden 2011. Politiken. Retrieved from http://politiken.dk/indland/politik/article5568139.ece
  11. Smith, N., Smith, V., & Verner, M. (2013). Why are so few females promoted into CEO and Vice president positions? Danish empirical evidence, 1997–2007. ILLR Review, 66(2), 380–408.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Aleksandra Gregorič
    • 1
  • Jesper Lau Hansen
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of International Economics and ManagementCenter for Corporate Governance, Copenhagen Business SchoolCopenhagenDenmark
  2. 2.Faculty of LawUniversity of CopenhagenCopenhagenDenmark

Personalised recommendations