Advertisement

Portugal: The Slow Progress of the Regulatory Framework

  • Sara Falcão Casaca
Chapter

Abstract

The regulatory context in Portugal has been slow, as policies to advance gender balance on boards have relied on a combination of awareness-raising initiatives and soft measures, such as policy recommendations and incentives for self-regulation. Empirical data show that improvements have been rather slow and inconsistent. Moreover, the normative approach has been top-down, resulting from the commitment of only a few people – namely a few political leaders rather than from a wide political and social support. The current government is planning to introduce binding legal measures aimed at increasing women’s representation (as the underrepresented sex) in the highest decision-making positions of the private (public listed companies) and public business sectors. No grass-roots movements or business actors have been actively involved in initiatives aimed at promoting a change in the regulatory framework. Despite this context, it is to be expected that no major hindering forces will block a more progressive route. It is argued that a more comprehensive, inter-sectoral and well-articulated approach is needed to ensure not only more satisfactory numbers as far as gender balance on boards is concerned, but also the development of a transformational organizational agenda capable of bringing gender equality to the workplaces and boardrooms in an effective and sustainable way.

References

  1. Addabbo, T., Bastos, A., Casaca, S. F., Duvvury, N., & Léime, Á. N. (2015). Gender and labour in times of austerity: Ireland, Italy and Portugal in a comparative perspective. International Labour Review, 154(4), 449–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alves, C. F., & Mendes, V. (2009). The Portuguese corporate governance codes as a factor of changes in rules and practices. In F. J. Iturriaga (Ed.), Codes of good practice around the World. New York: Nova Science Publishers.Google Scholar
  3. Casaca, S. F. (2012). Mercado de trabalho, flexibilidade e relações de género: tendências recentes. In S. F. Casaca (Ed.), Mudanças laborais e relações de género. Novos vetores de desigualdade (pp. 9–50). Lisbon: Fundação Económicas/Almedina.Google Scholar
  4. Casaca, S. F., & Damião, S. (2011). Gender (in)equality in the labour market and the Southern European welfare states. In E. Addis, P. de Villota, F. Degavre, & J. Eriksen (Eds.), Gender and well-being: The role of institutions (pp. 183–198). London: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  5. Casaca, S. F., et al. (2016). Guia para a promoção da igualdade entre mulheres e homens, ISEG-ULisboa, CESIS, ISCPS-ULisboa; EEAGrants-CIG.Google Scholar
  6. CIG. (2013). Igualdade de género 2012. Lisboa: Presidência do Conselho de Ministros.Google Scholar
  7. CMVM. (2016). Relatório anual sobre o governo das sociedades cotadas em Portugal—2014. Lisboa: CMVM.Google Scholar
  8. EIGE. (2016). Gender equality index 2015—Measuring gender equality in the European Union 2005–2012, Main findings. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.Google Scholar
  9. Ely, R. J., & Meyerson, D. B. (2000). Theories of gender in organizations: A new approach to organizational analysis and change. Research in Organizational Behaviour, 22, 103–151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. European Commission. (2012). Women in decision-making positions. Special Eurobarometer 376, Report.Google Scholar
  11. Ferreira, V. (2014). Employment and austerity: Changing welfare and gender regimes in Portugal. In M. Karamessini & J. Rubery (Eds.), Women and austerity. The economic crisis and the future of gender equality (pp. 207–227). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  12. Guerreiro, M. D., & Pereira, I. (2006). Responsabilidade social das empresas, igualdade e conciliação trabalho-família. Experiências do prémio ‘igualdade é qualidade’. Lisbon: CITE.Google Scholar
  13. Informa D&B. (2016). Onde param as mulheres? Presença feminina nas empresas em Portugal 2016 (6th ed.). Lisboa: D&B.Google Scholar
  14. IPCG. (2016). Código de governo das sociedades. Lisboa: Instituto Português de Corporate Governance.Google Scholar
  15. Kelan, E., & Wratil, P. (2014). In defence of merit—Have ceos become corporate feminists?. Paper presented at the 8th Biennial International Interdisciplinary Conference, Keele University, June 24–26, 2014.Google Scholar
  16. Krook, M. L. (2007). Candidate gender quotas: A framework for analysis. European Journal of Political Research, 4(3), 367–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mota, B. A., & Montez, M. V. (2012). Portugal. In W. J. L. Calkoen (Ed.), The corporate governance review (pp. 251–262). London: Law Business Research.Google Scholar
  18. Nogueira, M. C. (2009). Women in positions of power in Portugal. Contradictory positions and discourses. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 30, 70–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. OECD. (2013). Corporate governance—Board of directors of state-owned enterprises, an overview of national practices. Paris: OECD Publications.Google Scholar
  20. Pereira, S. G., Santos, M. L., & Silva, P. V. (2010). Portugal: Corporate governance reinforced. International Financial Law Review. Retrieved August 2, 2016, from http://www.iflr.com/Article/2634106/Portugal-Corporate-governance-reinforced.html
  21. Perista, H., Guerreiro, M. D., Jesus, C., & Moreno, M. L. (2008). A igualdade de género no quadro da responsabilidade social—o projecto Equal Diálogo social e igualdade nas empresas. ex aequo, 18, 103–120.Google Scholar
  22. Pordata (2016), Retrato de Portugal—e-book, Lisboa: Fundação Francisco Manuel dos Santos. http://www.pordata.pt/ebooks/PT2016v20160712/index.html#p=1. Accessed 6 July.
  23. Rêgo, M. C. C. (2012). Políticas de igualdade de género na União Europeia e em Portugal: influencias e incoerências. ex aequo, 25, 29–44.Google Scholar
  24. Romão, I. (1995). A igualdade de oportunidades nas empresas. gerir para a competitividade. gerir para o futuro. Lisbon: CIDM-PCM.Google Scholar
  25. Seierstad, C., Warner-Soderholm, G., Torchia, M., & Huse, M. (2015). Increasing the number of women on boards: The role of actors and processes. Journal of Business Ethics, 129, 1–27.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Terjesen, S., Aguilera, R. V., & Lorenz, R. (2015). Legislating a woman’s seat on the board: Institutional factors driving gender quotas for board of directors. Journal of Business Ethics, 128, 233–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Torres, A., Silva, F., Monteiro, T., & Cabrita, M. (2004). Homens e mulheres, entre família e trabalho. Lisbon: DEEP/CITE.Google Scholar
  28. Villa, P. (2013). The role of the EES in the promotion of gender equality in the labour market: A critical approach. In F. Bettio, J. Plantenga, & M. Smith (Eds.), Gender and the European labour market (pp. 135–167). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  29. Wall, K. (2007). Leave policy models and the articulation of work and family in Europe: A comparative perspective. In P. Moss & K. Wall (Eds.), International review of leave policies and related research 2007, Employment relations research series, No. 80 (pp. 25–43). London: Department for Business, Enterprise and Regulatory Reform.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Sara Falcão Casaca
    • 1
  1. 1.ISEG—Lisbon School of Economics and Management, Research Center in Economic and Organizational Sociology (SOCIUS-CSG)University of LisbonLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations