Advertisement

Gender Diversity on Boards in the United States, Australia, and Israel

  • Siri Terjesen
  • Lauren Trombetta
Chapter

Abstract

This chapter examines gender diversity on boards in three country cases: the United States, Australia, and Israel. We begin by reviewing each country’s general background, with a focus on the economic and political landscapes, followed by the corporate governance system, political and economic life of women, and women’s presence on corporate boards. We then explore the particularities of each nation’s corporate governance framework and specific legislation concerning women on boards. Here the countries vary considerably: Israel was the first country, in 1999, to have a quota for women on the boards of state-owned companies, while the United States and Australia have comply or explain codes since 2010 and 2014 respectively. We compare and contrast the three distinct national approaches including the enabling and hindering forces, and offer some reflections of key actors in each of the three societies. We conclude with a critical reflection of the cases.

References

  1. Adams, R., de Haan, J., Terjesen, S., & van Ees, H. (2015). Board diversity: Moving the field forward. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(2), 77–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aguilera, R., Judge, W., & Terjesen, S. (2017). Corporate governance deviance: A middle range theory. Academy of Management Review. doi: 10.5465/amr.2014.0394
  3. ASX Corporate Governance Council [ASXCGC]. (2014). Corporate governance principles and recommendations (3rd ed.). Sydney: ASX Corporate Governance Council.Google Scholar
  4. Australian Government. (2016). Gender balance on Australian government boards report 2015–16. Canberra.Google Scholar
  5. Bilimoria, D., & Piderit, S. K. (1994). Board committee membership: Effects of sex-based bias. Academy of Management Journal, 37(6), 1453–1477.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Catalyst. (2013). Quick take: Women on boards. New York.Google Scholar
  7. Catalyst. (2014). Quick take: Women on boards. New York.Google Scholar
  8. Catalyst. (2015). Statistical overview of women in the workforce. New York.Google Scholar
  9. Dahlerup, D. (2017). The quota project. http://www.quotaproject.org/
  10. Deloitte. (2016). The missing pieces report: The 2016 board diversity census of women and minorities on Fortune 500 boards.Google Scholar
  11. Deshe, G. (2013). The 3rd Catalyst report, Israel: Female participation on the TA100 index. http://www.strauss-group.co.il/cr/community-involvement/catalyst-initiative/
  12. Elis, N. (2015, March 8). Only 6% of TASE company CEOs are women. Jerusalem Post. Google Scholar
  13. Ernst & Young. (2012). Getting on board: Women join boards at higher rates, though progress comes slowly. Washington, DC: Ernst & Young.Google Scholar
  14. Fairchild, C. (2014). Number of Fortune 500 women CEOs reaches historic high. Fortune. Retrieved from http://fortune.com/2014/06/03/number-of-fortune-500-women-ceos-reaches-historic-high/
  15. Fleming, G. (2003). Corporate governance in Australia. Agenda: A Journal of Policy Analysis and Reform, 10(3), 195–212.Google Scholar
  16. Gentry, R. J., & Knippen, J. (2013). Making sense of nontraditional CEO appointments: The case of female CEOs. Orlando: Academy of Management Conference.Google Scholar
  17. Gould, J. A. (2016). Trickle-down effect: The impact of senior women on organizational gender diversity. Doctoral dissertation, University of South Australia, Australia.Google Scholar
  18. GovernanceMetrics International. (2012). Women on boards survey.Google Scholar
  19. Herzog, H. (1999). Gendering politics: Women in Israel. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Israel Securities Authority [ISA]. (1999). Companies law 5759–1999.Google Scholar
  21. Israel Securities Authority [ISA]. (2006). Corporate governance in Israel: Compatibility to the OECD code on corporate governance. Jerusalem: ISA Department of International Affairs.Google Scholar
  22. Izraeli, D. (2000). The paradox of affirmative action for women directors in Israel. In Women on corporate boards of directors (pp. 75–96). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Izraeli, D. (2003). Gender politics in Israel: The case of affirmative action for women directors. Women’s Studies International Forum, 26(2), 109–128. Pergamon, Greece.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Jackson, G. (2010). Understanding corporate governance in the United States (Working paper 223). Düsseldorf: Hans-Böckler-Stiftung.Google Scholar
  25. Khadem, N. (2016, June 7). Australia will not hit 30% women on boards by 2018. Sydney Morning Herald. http://www.smh.com.au/business/workplace-relations/australia-will-not-hit-30-women-on-boards-by-2018-time-for-quotas-elizabeth-proust-20160607-gpdd80.html
  26. Kiel, G. C., & Nicholson, G. J. (2003). Board composition and corporate performance: How the Australian experience informs contrasting theories of corporate governance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11(3), 189–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kogut, B., Colomer, J., & Belinky, M. (2014). Structural equality at the top of the corporation: Mandated quotas for women directors. Strategic Management Journal, 35(6), 891–902.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lauterbach, B., & Vaninsky, A. (1999). Ownership structure and firm performance: Evidence from Israel. Journal of Management and Governance, 3(2), 189–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lifkin, S. B. (2013). TASE loses dual-listed companies. Hamodia. http://hamodia.com/2013/06/30/tase-loses-dual-listed-companies/. Accessed 15 Feb 2017.
  30. Maman, D., & Rosenhek, Z. (2009). The bank of Israel: Political economy in the NeoLiberal Era. N.p.: The Van-Leer Jerusalem Institute and Hakibbutz Hameuchad Publishing House.Google Scholar
  31. Mooney, A. (2014, September 18). The business guru: Ofra Strauss. Financial Times. Retrieved from https://www.ft.com/content/bc140536-383a-11e4-a687-00144feabdc0
  32. National Public Radio. (2013, March 11). ‘Lean In’ Facebook’s Sheryl Sandberg explains what’s holding women back. Podcast retrieved from http://www.npr.org/2013/03/11/173740524/lean-in-facebooks-sheryl-sandberg-explains-whats-holding-women-back
  33. New York Stock Exchange. (2014). NYSE: Corporate governance guide. New York: Tim Dempsey.Google Scholar
  34. News Corp Australia. (2015). Elizabeth Broderick reveals why Australia must consider quotas to get more women in senior roles. http://www.news.com.au/finance/work/careers/elizabeth-broderick-reveals-why--australia-must-consider-quotas-to-get-more-women-in-senior-roles/news-story/42e7e2a8831626b60743033924530d62. Accessed 17 Feb 2017.
  35. Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2011). Corporate governance in Israel. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
  36. Pande, R., & Ford, D. (2011). Gender quotas and female leadership: A review. Background paper for the World Bank.Google Scholar
  37. Paquette, D. (2015, February 9). Why American women hate board quotas. Fortune. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/on-leadership/wp/2015/02/09/why-american-women-hate-board-quotas/?utm_term=.c35c46bf887c. Accessed 17 Feb 2017.
  38. Raday, F. (1995). Women in law in Israel: a study of the relationship between professional integration and feminism. Ga St U L Rev, 12, 525.Google Scholar
  39. Sealy, R., Doldor, E., Vinnicombe, S., Terjesen, S., Anderson, D., & Atewologun, D. (2017). Expanding the notion of dialogic trading zones for impactful research: The case of women on boards research. British Journal of Management. Forthcoming, 28, 64–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). (2015). Corporate governance issues, including executive compensation disclosure and related SRO rules. Washington, DC: US Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
  41. Talmud, I., & Izraeli, D. N. (1999). The relationship between gender and performance issues of concern to directors: correlates or institution? Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(4), 459–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Terjesen, S., Sealy, R., & Singh, V. (2009). Women directors on corporate boards: A review and research agenda. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 17(3), 320–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Terjesen, S., & Sealy, R. (2016). Board gender quotas: exploring ethical tensions from a multi-theoretical perspective. Business Ethics Quarterly, 26(01), 23–65.Google Scholar
  44. Terjesen, S., Couto, E., & Francisco, P. (2016). Independent and female directors and agency costs: A multi-country study. Journal of Management and Governance, 20(3), 447–483.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. The World Bank. (2017a). Proportion of seats held by women in national parliaments (%) [Data file]. Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SG.GEN.PARL.ZS?year_high_desc=true
  46. The World Bank. (2017b). Labor force participation rate, female (% of female population ages 15+) (modeled ILO estimate) [Data file]. Retrieved from http://data.worldbank.org/indicator/SG.GEN.PARL.ZS?year_high_desc=true
  47. Westpac. (2015). Ann Sherry named as the overall winner of the 100 Women of Influence Awards [Press release]. Retrieved from https://www.westpac.com.au/about-westpac/media/media-releases/2015/16-october/
  48. Wilmovsky, I., & Tamir, T. (2012). Women in Israel—Between theory and reality: Data and information, changes, and rends. Washington, DC: Israeli Women’s Network.Google Scholar
  49. World Economic Forum. (2015). Global gender act report. Retrieved from http://reports.weforum.org/global-gender-gap-report-2015/

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Siri Terjesen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Lauren Trombetta
    • 3
  1. 1.AU Center for InnovationAmerican University’s Kogod School of BusinessWashington, DCUSA
  2. 2.Norwegian School of EconomicsBergenNorway
  3. 3.American University’s Kogod School of BusinessWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations