Entropy Based Surface Quality Assessment of 3D Prints

Conference paper
Part of the Advances in Intelligent Systems and Computing book series (AISC, volume 573)

Abstract

In the paper the automatic method of visual quality assessment of surfaces of 3D prints is presented. The proposed approach is based on the use of entropy and may be applied for on-line inspection of 3D printing progress during the printing process. In case of observed decrease of the printed surface quality the emergency stop may be used allowing saving the filament, as well as possible correction of the printed object. The verification of the validity of the proposed method has been made using several prints made from different colors of the PLA filaments. Since the entropy of the image is related to the presence of structural information, the color to grayscale conversion of the test images has been applied in order to simplify further calculations. The analysis of the impact of the chosen color to grayscale conversion method on the obtained results is presented as well.

Keywords

3D prints Entropy Image quality assessment Image analysis 

References

  1. 1.
    Battisti, F., Bosc, E., Carli, M., Callet, P.L., Perugia, S.: Objective image quality assessment of 3D synthesized views. Sig. Process. Image Commun. 30, 78–88 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Benoit, A., Le Callet, P., Campisi, P., Cousseau, R.: Quality assessment of stereoscopic images. EURASIP J. Image Video Process. 2008(1), 659024 (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chauhan, V., Surgenor, B.: A comparative study of machine vision based methods for fault detection in an automated assembly machine. Procedia Manufact. 1, 416–428 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Chen, M.J., Cormack, L.K., Bovik, A.C.: No-reference quality assessment of natural stereopairs. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 22(9), 3379–3391 (2013)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chen, M.J., Su, C.C., Kwon, D.K., Cormack, L.K., Bovik, A.C.: Full-reference quality assessment of stereopairs accounting for rivalry. Sig. Process. Image Commun. 28(9), 1143–1155 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Cheng, Y., Jafari, M.A.: Vision-based online process control in manufacturing applications. IEEE Trans. Autom. Sci. Eng. 5(1), 140–153 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fang, T., Jafari, M.A., Bakhadyrov, I., Safari, A., Danforth, S., Langrana, N.: Online defect detection in layered manufacturing using process signature. In: Proceedings of IEEE International Conference on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, vol. 5, pp. 4373–4378, San Diego, California, USA (1998)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Fastowicz, J., Okarma, K.: Texture based quality assessment of 3D prints for different lighting conditions. In: Chmielewski, L.J., Datta, A., Kozera, R., Wojciechowski, K. (eds.) ICCVG 2016. LNCS, vol. 9972, pp. 17–28. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46418-3_2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Goldmann, L., Simone, F.D., Ebrahimi, T.: A comprehensive database and subjective evaluation methodology for quality of experience in stereoscopic video. In: 3D Image Processing (3DIP) and Applications, vol. 7526 in Proceedings of SPIE (2010)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Guo, J., Vidal, V., Cheng, I., Basu, A., Baskurt, A., Lavoue, G.: Subjective and objective visual quality assessment of textured 3D meshes. ACM Trans. Appl. Percept. 14(2), 11:1–11:20 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    International Telecommunication Union: Recommendation ITU-R BT.601-7 - Studio encoding parameters of digital television for standard 4:3 and wide-screen 16:9 aspect ratios (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    International Telecommunication Union: Recommendation ITU-R BT.709-6 - Parameter values for the HDTV standards for production and international programme exchange (2015)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lin, Y., Wu, J.: Quality assessment of stereoscopic 3D image compression by binocular integration behaviors. IEEE Trans. Image Process. 23(4), 1527–1542 (2014)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Okarma, K., Fastowicz, J.: No-reference quality assessment of 3D prints based on the GLCM analysis. In: 2016 21st International Conference on Methods and Models in Automation and Robotics (MMAR), pp. 788–793 (2016)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Okarma, K.: On the usefulness of combined metrics for 3D image quality assessment. In: Choraś, R.S. (ed.) Image Processing and Communications Challenges 6. AISC, vol. 313, pp. 137–144. Springer, Heidelberg (2015). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-10662-5_17 Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Okarma, K., Fastowicz, J.: Quality assessment of 3D prints based on feature similarity metrics. In: Choraś, R.S. (ed.) Image Processing and Communications Challenges 8, pp. 104–111. Springer, Heidelberg (2017). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-47274-4_12 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Okarma, K., Fastowicz, J., Tecław, M.: Application of structural similarity based metrics for quality assessment of 3D prints. In: Chmielewski, L.J., Datta, A., Kozera, R., Wojciechowski, K. (eds.) ICCVG 2016. LNCS, vol. 9972, pp. 244–252. Springer, Cham (2016). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-46418-3_22 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Starch, J., Kilner, J., Hilton, A.: Objective quality assessment in free-viewpoint video production. In: Proceedings of the 3DTV Conference: The True Vision - Capture. Transmission and Display of 3D Video, pp. 225–228, Istanbul, Turkey (2008)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Straub, J.: Initial work on the characterization of additive manufacturing (3D printing) using software image analysis. Machines 3(2), 55–71 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Szkilnyk, G., Hughes, K., Surgenor, B.: Vision based fault detection of automated assembly equipment. In: Proceedings of ASME/IEEE International Conference on Mechatronic and Embedded Systems and Applications, Parts A and B, vol. 3, pp. 691–697, Washington, DC, USA (2011)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tourloukis, G., Stoyanov, S., Tilford, T., Bailey, C.: Data driven approach to quality assessment of 3D printed electronic products. In: Proceedings of 38th International Spring Seminar on Electronics Technology (ISSE), pp. 300–305, Eger, Hungary, May 2015Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yang, J., Hou, C., Zhou, Y., Zhang, Z., Guo, J.: Objective quality assessment method of stereo images. In: Proceedings of the 3DTV Conference: The True Vision - Capture. Transmission and Display of 3D Video, pp. 1–4, Potsdam, Germany (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Signal Processing and Multimedia Engineering, Faculty of Electrical EngineeringWest Pomeranian University of Technology, SzczecinSzczecinPoland

Personalised recommendations