Models of Surfaces and Abstract Art in the Early Twentieth Century

Chapter

Abstract

In the late 1800s and early 1900s mathematicians were producing models of mathematical surfaces out of plaster, wire, and other materials. These models were used to illustrate research and for university instruction. Gradually, mathematical interest in these models faded, but the models themselves were still on display in universities and museums. There they were found by several artists from the Constructivist and Surrealist movements, two movements of abstract art that were active in the early twentieth century. Artists from each of these movements drew some inspiration from these models of surfaces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The article has been published in Bridges Pécs, Conference proceeding of Bridges: Mathematical Connections in Art, Music, and Science held 24–28 July 2010 in Pécs, Hungary, edited by George W. Hart and Reza Sarhangi, 11–18. Phoenix: Tessellations Publishing, 2010.

Sources

  1. Artmann, B. (1994). Symmetry through the ages: Highlights from the history of regular polyhedra. In J. Milo (Ed.), Eves’ circles (pp. 139–148). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.Google Scholar
  2. Baldwin, N. (1988). Man Ray: American artist. New York: Clarkson N. Potter, Inc.Google Scholar
  3. Barr, A. (1936). Cubism and abstract art. New York: Museum of Modern Art.Google Scholar
  4. Baynes, T. S., & Smith, W. R. (Eds.). (1875). Mathematical drawing and modelling. The Encyclopaedia Britannica: A dictionary of arts, sciences, and general literature (pp. 628–629). Encyclopaedia Britannica.Google Scholar
  5. Breton, A. (1972). Surrealism and painting (Translated from the French by Simon Watson Taylor). London: Macdonald.Google Scholar
  6. Fischer, G. (Ed.) (1986). Mathematical models: From the collections of universities and museums (2 Vols). Braunschweig: Friedr. Vieweg and Sohn.Google Scholar
  7. Hammer, M., & Lodder, C. (1996). Hepworth and Gabo: A constructivist dialogue. In D. Thistlewood (Ed.), Barabara hepworth reconsidered (pp. 109–133). Liverpool: Liverpool University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Hammer, M., & Lodder, C. (2000). Constructing modernity: The art and career of Naum Gabo. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Hedgecoe, J., & Moore, H. (1968). Henry Spencer Moore. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  10. Henderson, L. (1983). The fourth dimension and non-Euclidean geometry in modern art. Princeton: Princeton University Press.MATHGoogle Scholar
  11. Jean, M., & Mezei Á. (1960). The history of surrealist painting (Translated from the French by Simon Watson Taylor). London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson and New York: Grove Press.Google Scholar
  12. Kidwell, P. (1996). American mathematics viewed objectively: The case of geometric models. In R. Calinger (Ed.), Vita mathematica (pp. 197–208). Washington, DC: Mathematical Association of America.Google Scholar
  13. Klein, F. (1894). The Evanston Colloquium lectures on mathematics. New York: Macmillan.MATHGoogle Scholar
  14. South Kensington Museum. (1877). Catalogue of the special loan collection of scientific apparatus at the South Kensington Museum (3rd ed.). London: Eyre and Spottiswoode.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Lesley UniversityCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations