Going Beyond pp 145-157 | Cite as

Contextual Sustainability in Heritage Practice: Urbanization, Neighbourliness, and Community Dialogue in Akçalar, Turkey

Chapter
First Online:
Part of the Heritage Studies book series (HEST)

Abstract

“Sustainability” is a multifaceted concept, but archaeologists generally focus efforts on the sustainability of the site itself. This paper argues that we should instead actively engage with locals to approach sustainability more broadly in a multidimensional, participatory way. The ethnographic research described here thus examines the community’s vision for a sustainable future via participant observation and interviews conducted with over 70 residents in Akçalar, Bursa, Turkey, the local context of Neolithic-Chalcolithic Aktopraklık Höyük. Results indicate that rapid urbanization and industrialization have heightened locals’ awareness of the loss of traditional lifeways and values, such as agricultural practices. Many also lament the concurrent decline of neighbourliness and community cohesion. Moreover, participants noted the previous lack of adequate dialogue between archaeologists and community residents. With this robust foundation of community perspectives, we can now move forward in practice with new locally focused programs at the Aktopraklık open-air museum and in town, including displays of family heirlooms and educational workshops. Though community understandings and goals for sustainability may not exactly match those of archaeologists, by fully understanding the whole picture, this paper aims to demonstrate how heritage practitioners can better synergize their approaches to sustainability with the local fabric to yield greater benefits for all.

Keywords

Sustainability Sustainable development Heritage studies Cultural heritage management Heritage tourism Public outreach Public archaeology Community Education Urbanization Turkey 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research would not have been possible without the support of the Research Center for Anatolian Civilizations (ANAMED), the British Institute at Ankara, the Mark Diamond Research Fund of the Graduate Student Association at the University at Buffalo, the Turkish Ministry of Culture and Tourism, Dr. Necmi Karul and Dr. Peter Biehl.

References

  1. Albert, M. (2015a). Mission and vision of sustainability discourses in heritage studies. In M. Albert (Ed.), Perceptions of sustainability in heritage studies, Heritage studies 4 (pp. 11–20). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albert, M. (2015b). Perceptions of the contributors. In M. Albert (Ed.), Perceptions of sustainability in heritage studies, Heritage studies 4 (pp. 3–8). Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Akçalar Participants (AP). (2015). Interviews by the author. Akçalar, Turkey. May–October 2015.Google Scholar
  4. Atalay, S. (2010). We don’t talk about Çatalhöyük, we live it: Sustainable archaeological practicethrough community-based participatory research. World Archaeology, 42, 418–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Atalay, S. (2012). Community-based archaeology: Research with, by, and for indigenous and local communities. Berkeley/Los Angeles: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  6. Bernard, H. R. (2011). Research methods in anthropology: Qualitative and quantitative approaches. Lanham: AltaMira.Google Scholar
  7. Escobar, A. (1991). Anthropology and the development encounter : The making and marketing of development Anthropology. American Ethnologist, 18(4), 658–682.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Escobar, A. (1998). Whose knowledge, whose nature? Biodiversity, Conservation, and the Political Ecology of Social Movements, 5, 53–82.Google Scholar
  9. Garrod, B., & Fyall, A. (1998). Beyond the rhetoric of sustainable Tourism ? Tourism Management, 19(3), 199–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hall, C. M. (1994). Tourism, culture, and the presentation of social reality. In Tourism and politics: Policy, power and place. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  11. Herzfeld, M. (1991). A place in history: Social and monumental time in a Cretan town. Princeton, NJ: Princeton UP.Google Scholar
  12. Karkiner, N. (2012). “The unity of statement” as the interpretation of space: The case of Archaeo-park in Turkey. Human Geographies, 2, 23–32.Google Scholar
  13. Karul, N., Bertan Avcı, M., Deveci, A., & Karkıner, N. (2010). Developing the cultural sector at the Bursa Aktopraklık mound: A multifaceted project. In M. Özdoğan, N. Akın, A. Debold-Kritter, L. Oosterbeek, N. Tuna, & N. Yalçın (Eds.), TÜBA-KED (Vol. 8, pp. 241–262). Ankara: TÜBA.Google Scholar
  14. McKercher, B., & du Cros, H. (2002). Cultural tourism: The partnership between tourism and cultural heritage management. Binghamton, NY: Haworth Hospitality Press.Google Scholar
  15. Meskell, L. (2012). The nature of heritage: The new South Africa. Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.Google Scholar
  16. Nilüfer Municipality. (2015). Akçalar TUİK Veri. Bursa, Turkey: Nilufer.Google Scholar
  17. Robinson, J. (2004). Squaring the circle? Some thoughts on the idea of sustainable development. Ecological Economics, 48, 369–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Silberman, N. A. (2013). Discourses of development: Narratives of cultural heritage as an economic resource. In R. Staiff, R. Bushell, & S. Watson (Eds.), Heritage and tourism: Place, encounter, engagement (pp. 213–226). London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  19. Smith, L. (2006). Uses of heritage. London/New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  20. Ulutaş, O. (2014). Nilüfer’in Hikayesi. Bursa, Turkey: Nilüfer Belediyesi.Google Scholar
  21. UNESCO. (2013). Operational guidelines for the implementation of the world heritage convention. Intergovernmental Committee for the protection of the world cultural and natural heritage. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) World Heritage Centre, Paris, France.Google Scholar
  22. UNESCO. (2015). UNESCO world heritage and sustainable tourism programme. http://whc.unesco.org/en/tourism/. United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO) World Heritage Centre, Paris, France.
  23. United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development Rio+20 (United Nations). (2012). The future we want. Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, 20–22 June 2012.Google Scholar
  24. van Oers, R. (2015). Cultural heritage management and sustainability. In M. Albert (Ed.), Perceptions of sustainability in heritage studies, Heritage studies 4 (pp. 189–202). Berlin: de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  25. World Commission on Environment and Development (World Commission). (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of AnthropologyUniversity at BuffaloBuffaloUSA

Personalised recommendations