Advertisement

The Coming Age of South Korea: Power, Influence and Implications

  • Virginie Grzelczyk
Chapter

Abstract

In the past three decades, South Korea has transformed itself from an authoritarian, developing country to a consolidated democracy. These rapid and wide-ranging changes have required the country to embrace globalisation as well as to consolidate security partnerships with a number of allies. This chapter explores the argument that South Korea has been slowly changing from being a middle power to becoming a power in the middle, assuming a mediating role within a changing Northeast Asian region and beyond. The chapter examines the changes occurring within the current world system and Korea within the middle power rhetoric.

Keywords

Middle power Globalization World system 

References

  1. Aggarwal, V. K., Koo, M. G., Lee, S., & Moon, C.-I. (2008). Northeast Asia ripe for integration?. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  2. Balcer, A. (2012). Golden age of middle power? Centre for European Strategy, Demos Europa.Google Scholar
  3. Bercovitch, J., Anagnoson, T., & Wille, D. (1991). Some conceptual issues and empirical trends in the study of successful mediation in international relations. Journal of Peace Research, 28(1), 717.Google Scholar
  4. Bobrow, D. (1981). The perspective of great power foreign policy: Steps in context. In J. Zubin (Ed.), Dynamics of third party intervention. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
  5. Brewster, D. (2010). India’s developing relationship with South Korea: A useful friend in East Asia. Asian Survey, 50(2), 402–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burton, J., & Dukes, F. (1990). Conflict: Practices in management, settlement, and resolution. New York: St. Martin’s Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Calder, K. E., & Fukuyama, F. (2008). East Asian multilateralism: Prospects for regional stability. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Calder, K., & Min, Y. (2004). Regionalism and critical junctures: Explaining the ‘organization gap’ in Northeast Asia. Journal of East Asian Studies, 4(2), 191–226.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cooper, A. (1997). Niche diplomacy: Middle powers after the Cold War. NewYork: St. Martin’s Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cooper, A., Higgott, R. A., & Nossal, K. R. (1993). Relocating middle powers: Australia and Canada in a changing world order. Vancouver: UBC Press.Google Scholar
  11. Cooper, A., & Mo, J. (2011). Middle power leadership and the evolution of the G20. Seoul: Hills Governance Center at Yonsei University.Google Scholar
  12. Cull, N. J. (2012). Global trends and middle power practices of public diplomacy: Implications for Korea. Korea Public Diplomacy Forum.Google Scholar
  13. Deutsch, M. (1973). The resolution of conflict: Constructive and destructive processes. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  14. Fisher, R., Ury, W., & Patton, B. (1991). Getting to yes: Negotiating agreement without giving in. New York: Penguin.Google Scholar
  15. Fukuyama, F. (1992). The end of history and the last man. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  16. Holbraad, C. (1984). Middle powers in international politics. New York: St. Martin’s Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hwang, B. Y. (2003). Defusing anti-American rhetoric in South Korea. Washington: The Heritage Foundation.Google Scholar
  18. Ikenberry, G. J. (2011). Liberal leviathan: The origins, crisis, and transformation of the American world order. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  19. John, J. V. (2014). Becoming and being a middle power: Exploring a new dimension of South. Korea’s foreign policy. China Report, 50(4), 325–341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jordaan, E. (2003). The concept of a middle power in international relations: Distinguishing between emerging and traditional middle powers. Politikon: South African Journal of Political Studies, 30(2), 165–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kalinowski, T., & Cho, H. (2012). Korea’s search for a global role between hard economic interests and soft power. European Journal of Development Research, 24(2), 242–260.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kang, D. C. (2003). Getting Asia wrong: The need for new analytical frameworks. International Security International Security, 27(4), 57–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Katzenstein, P. J. (1985). Small states in world markets: Industrial policy in Europe. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Lederach, J. P. (1989). Who mediates in developing countries? Conflict Resolution Notes, 6(4), 82–83.Google Scholar
  25. Lee, S.-J. (2012). South Korea as new middle power seeking complex diplomacy. Seoul: East Asia Institute (EAI).Google Scholar
  26. Lee, Y.-I., & Lee, K. T. (2015). Economic nationalism and globalization in South Korea: A critical insight. Asian Perspective, 39, 125–151.Google Scholar
  27. Morgenthau, H. J. (1985). Politics among nations: The struggle for power and peace. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
  28. Nye, J. S. (2006). Soft power: The means to success in world politics. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  29. Ping, J. H. (2005). Middle power statecraft: Indonesia, Malaysia, and the Asia Pacific. Burlington: Ashgate.Google Scholar
  30. Robertson, J. (2007). South Korea as a middle power: Capacity, behavior and now opportunity. International Journal of Korean Unification Studies, 16(1), 151–174.Google Scholar
  31. Ross, R. S. (1999). The geography of the peace: East Asia in the twenty-first century. International Security, 23(4), 81–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Schweller, R. L. (1998). Deadly imbalances: Tripolarity and Hitler’s strategy of world conquest. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  33. Shim, D. (2009). A shrimp amongst whales? Assessing South Korea’s regional power status. Hamburg: German Institute of Global and Area Studies.Google Scholar
  34. Song, I. (1998). Center for Pacific basin monetary and economic studies working paper. Federal Reserve Bank of San Francisco, CA.Google Scholar
  35. Spero, J. B. (2009). Great power security dilemmas for pivotal middle power bridging. Contemporary Security Policy, 30(1), 147–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Touval, S. (1982). The peace brokers: Mediators in the Arab-Israeli conflict, 1948–1979. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Vital, D. (1971). The survival of small states: Studies in small power/great power conflict. London, New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Watson, I. (2013). Beyond the aid trap for emerging donors: Private and public partnerships in South Korea’s official development assistance (ODA) strategy. Journal of Comparative Asian Development, 12(2), 212–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Young, O. R. (1967). The intermediaries: Third parties in international crises. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Zartman, W., & Touval, S. (1996). International mediation in the post-Cold War era. In C. Crocker, F. Hampson, & P. Aall (Eds.), Managing global chaos (pp. 445–461). Washington: United States Institute of Peace Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Aston UniversityBirminghamUK

Personalised recommendations