New Approach for Optimizing the Usage of Situation Recognition Algorithms Within IoT Domains

  • Chinara Mammadova
  • Helmi Ben Hmida
  • Andreas Braun
  • Arjan Kuijper
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10217)

Abstract

The growth of the Internet of Things (IoT) over the past few years enabled a lot of application domains. Due to the increasing number of IoT connected devices, the amount of generated data is increasing too. Processing huge amounts of data is complex due to the continuously running situation recognition algorithms. To overcome these problems, this paper proposes an approach for optimizing the usage of situation recognition algorithms in Internet of Things domains. The key idea of our approach is to select important data, based on situation recognition purposes, and to execute the situation recognition algorithms after all relevant data have been collected. The main advantage of our approach is that situation recognition algorithms will not be executed each time new data is received, thus allowing the reduction of the situation recognition algorithms execution frequency and saving computational resources.

Keywords

Internet of Things Smart living Reasoning usage optimization Situation recognition Relevant context information universAAL IoT platform 

References

  1. 1.
    Wang, X.H., Zhang, D.Q., Gu, T., Pung, H.K.: Ontology based context modeling and reasoning using OWL. In: Proceedings of the Second IEEE Annual Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops, pp. 18–22 (2004)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Yau, S.S., Liu, J.: Hierarchical situation modeling and reasoning for pervasive computing. In: The Fourth IEEE Workshop on Software Technologies for Future Embedded and Ubiquitous Systems, 2006 and the 2006 Second International Workshop on Collaborative Computing, Integration, and Assurance. SEUS 2006/WCCIA 2006, 6 pp. (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bikakis, A., Patkos, T., Antoniou, G., Plexousakis, D.: A survey of semantics-based approaches for context reasoning in ambient intelligence. In: Mühlhäuser, M., Ferscha, A., Aitenbichler, E. (eds.) AmI 2007. CCIS, vol. 11, pp. 14–23. Springer, Heidelberg (2008). doi:10.1007/978-3-540-85379-4_3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Miorandi, D., Sicari, S., De Pellegrini, F., Chlamtac, I.: Internet of Things: vision, applications and research challenges. Ad Hoc Netw. 10(7), 1497–1516 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cheong, Y.G., Kim, Y.J., Yoo, S.Y., Lee, H., Lee, S., Chae, S.C., Choi, H.J.: An ontology-based reasoning approach towards energy-aware smart homes. In: 2011 IEEE Consumer Communications and Networking Conference (CCNC), pp. 850–854 (2011)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ricquebourg, V., Durand, D., Menga, D., Marhic, B., Delahoche, L., Loge, C., Jolly-Desodt, A.M.: Context inferring in the Smart Home: an SWRL approach. In: 21st International Conference on Advanced Information Networking and Applications Workshops, AINAW 2007, vol. 2, pp. 290–295 (2007)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Li, S., Yang, Z., Lin, X.: RTCR: a soft real-time context reasoner. In: Second International Conference on Embedded Software and Systems (ICESS 2005), 6 p. (2005)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Dey, A.K.: Understanding and using context. Pers. Ubiquit. Comput. 5(1), 4–7 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Friess, P.: Internet of Things: Converging Technologies for Smart Environments and Integrated Ecosystems. River Publishers, Gistrup (2013)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Vermesan, O., Friess, P., Guillemin, P., Gusmeroli, S., Sundmaeker, H., Bassi, A., Jubert, I.S., Mazura, M., Harrison, M., Eisenhauer, M., Doody, P.: Internet of Things strategic research roadmap. Internet Things: Glob. Technol. Societal Trends 1, 9–52 (2011)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Chen, L., Nugent, C.D., Wang, H.: A knowledge-driven approach to activity recognition in smart homes. IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 24(6), 961–974 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Statista Inc.: Internet of Things (IoT): number of connected devices worldwide from 2012 to 2020 (in billions) (2016). https://www.statista.com/statistics/471264/iot-number-of-connected-devices-worldwide/. Accessed 01 Dec 2016
  13. 13.
  14. 14.
    Narendra, N., Ponnalagu, K., Ghose, A., Tamilselvam, S.: Goal-driven context-aware data filtering in IoT-based systems. In: 2015 IEEE 18th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems, pp. 2171–2179 (2015)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kaisler, S., Armour, F., Espinosa, J.A., Money, W.: Big data: issues and challenges moving forward. In: 2013 46th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS), pp. 995–1004 (2013)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Meditskos, G., Dasiopoulou, S., Efstathiou, V., Kompatsiaris, I.: SP-ACT: a hybrid framework for complex activity recognition combining OWL and SPARQL rules. In: 2013 IEEE International Conference on Pervasive Computing and Communications Workshops (PERCOM Workshops), pp. 25–30 (2013)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Siegel, C., Dorner, T.: Information technologies for active and assisted living- Influences to the quality of life of an ageing society International Journal of Medical Informatics. 2016, ElsevierGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kejriwal, S., Mahajan, S.: Smart buildings: how IoT technology aims to add value for real estate companies (2016). https://www2.deloitte.com/content/dam/Deloitte/us/Documents/financial-services/us-dup-smart-buildings-how-iot-technology-aims-to-add-value-for-real-estate-companies.pdf. Accessed 18 Nov 2016
  19. 19.
    Perera, C., Zaslavsky, A., Christen, P., Georgakopoulos, D.: Context aware computing for the internet of things: a survey. IEEE Commun. Surv. Tutorials 16(1), 414–454 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Fraunhofer IGDDarmstadtGermany
  2. 2.Technische Universität DarmstadtDarmstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations