Effects of Climate Change on Ecosystem Services in the Northern Rockies

  • Travis WarziniackEmail author
  • Megan Lawson
  • S. Karen Dante-Wood
Part of the Advances in Global Change Research book series (AGLO, volume 63)


Ecosystem services are increasingly valued on federal lands, beyond just their economic value. Climate change effects will vary greatly within different subregions of the Northern Rockies, with some ecosystem services being affected in the short term and others in the long term. Of the many ecosystem services provided in the Northern Rockies, eight are considered here, including annual water yield, water quality, wood products, minerals and mineral extraction, forage for livestock, viewsheds and air quality, regulation of soil erosion, and carbon sequestration.

Although annual water yield is not expected to change significantly, timing of water availability will likely shift, and summer flows may decline. These changes may result in some communities experiencing summer water shortages, although reservoir storage can provide some capacity. Rural agricultural communities will be disproportionately affected by climate change if water does become limiting. Water quality will also decrease in some locations if wildfires and floods increase, adding sediment to rivers and reservoirs. Hazardous fuel treatments, riparian restoration, and upgrading of hydrologic infrastructure can build resilience to disturbances that damage water quality.

Forage for livestock is expected to increase in productive grasslands as a result of a longer growing season and in some cases elevated carbon dioxide. Therefore, ranching and grazing may benefit from climate change. Primary effects on grazing include loss of rural population, spread of nonnative grasses, and fragmentation of rangelands.

Viewsheds and air quality will be negatively affected by increasing wildfires and longer pollen seasons. A growing percentage of the Northern Rockies population will be in demographic groups at risk for respiratory and other medical problems on days with poor air quality. Hazardous fuel treatments can help build resilience to disturbances that degrade air quality.

Carbon sequestration will be increasingly difficult if wildfires, insect outbreaks, and perhaps plant disease increase as expected, especially in the western part of the Northern Rockies. At the same time, managing forests for carbon sequestration is likely to become more important in response to national policies on carbon emissions. Hazardous fuel treatments can help build resilience to disturbances that rapidly oxidize carbon and emit it to the atmosphere.


Water yield Water quality Wood products Minerals Viewsheds Air quality Soil erosion Carbon sequestration Climate change Adaptation Ecosystem services Social vulnerability Rocky Mountains Natural capital 


  1. American Lung Association. (2015). State of the air 2015. 28 May 2015.
  2. Bedsworth, L. (2011). Air quality planning in California’s changing climate. Climatic Change, 111, 101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Beyers, W. B., & Nelson, P. B. (2000). Contemporary development forces in the nonmetropolitan west: New insights from rapidly growing communities. Journal of Rural Studies, 16, 459–474.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Borrie, W. T., Davenport, M., Freimund, W. A., & Manning, R. E. (2002). Assessing the relationship between desired experiences and support for management actions at Yellowstone National Park using multiple methods. Journal of Park and Recreation Administration, 20, 51–64.Google Scholar
  5. Brandt, J. P., Morgan, T. A., Keegan, C. E., et al. (2012). Idaho’s forest products industry and timber harvest, 2006, Resource Bulletin RMRS-RB-12. Fort Collins: U.S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bytnerowicz, A., Omasa, K., & Paoletti, E. (2007). Integrated effects of air pollution and climate change on forests: A northern hemisphere perspective. Environmental Pollution, 147, 438–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Center for Disease Control. (2009). BRFSS [Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System] annual survey data. Atlanta: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Center for Disease Control. 28 May 2015.
  8. Cleland, E. E., Collins, S. L., Dickson, T. L., Farrer, E.C., Gross, K. L., Gherardi, L. A., Hallett, L. M., et al. (2013). Sensitivity of grassland plant community composition to spatial vs. temporal variation in precipitation. Ecology, 94(8), 1687–1696.Google Scholar
  9. Collins, S., & Larry, E. (2007). Caring for our natural assets: An ecosystem services perspective. In R. L. Deal (Ed.), Integrated restoration of forested ecosystems to achieve multiresource benefits: Proceedings of the 2007 national silviculture workshop, General Technical Report PNW-733 (pp. 1–11). Portland: U.S. Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.Google Scholar
  10. Cutter, S. L., Boruff, B. J., & Shirley, W. L. (2003). Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Social Science Quarterly, 84, 242–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fothergill, A., & Peek, L. A. (2004). Poverty and disasters in the United States: A review of recent sociological findings. Natural Hazards, 32, 89–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Foti, R., Ramirez, J. A., & Brown, T. C. (2012). Vulnerability of U.S. water supply to shortage: A technical document supporting the Forest Service 2010 RPA assessment (General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-295). Fort Collins: U.S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Healey, S. P., Urbanski, S. P., Patterson, P. L., et al. (2014). A framework for simulating map error in ecosystem models. Remote Sensing of the Environment, 150, 207–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hicke, J. A., Allen, C. D., Desai, A. R., et al. (2012). Effects of biotic disturbances on forest carbon cycling in the United States and Canada. Global Change Biology, 18, 7–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Irland, L. C., Adams, D., Alig, R., et al. (2001). Assessing socioeconomic impacts of climate change on US forests, wood-product markets, and forest recreation. Bioscience, 51, 753–764.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Johnson, W. C., Millett, B. V., Gilmanov, T., et al. (2005). Vulnerability of northern prairie wetlands to climate change. Bioscience, 55, 863–872.Google Scholar
  17. Karetinkov, D., Parra, N., Bell, B., Ruth, M., Ross, K., & Irani, D. (2008). Economic impacts of climate change on North Dakota. A review and assessment conducted by the Center for Integrative Environmental Research (CIER).Google Scholar
  18. Keegan, C. E., Sorenson, C. B., Morgan, T. A., et al. (2012). Impact of the Great Recession and housing collapse on the forest products industry in the western United States. Forest Products Journal, 61, 625–634.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Keegan, C. E., Todd, A. M., Wagner, F. G., et al. (2005). Capacity for utilization of USDA Forest Service, Region 1 small-diameter timber. Forest Products Journal, 55, 143–147.Google Scholar
  20. Kinney, P. L. (2008). Climate change, air quality, and human health. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 35, 459–467.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kline, J. D., & Mazzotta, M. J. (2012). Evaluating tradeoffs among ecosystem services in the management of public lands (General Technical Report PNW-GTR-865). Portland: U.S. Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kunce, M., & Shogren, J. F. (2005). On interjurisdictional competition and environmental federalism. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 50, 212–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Maher, A. T. (2007). The economic impacts of sagebrush steppe wildfires on an eastern Oregon ranch. Master’s thesis. Corvallis: Oregon State University.Google Scholar
  24. McIver, C. P., Sorenson, C. B., Keegan, C. E., et al. (2013). Montana’s forest products industry and timber harvest 2009 (Resource Bulleting RMRS-RB-16). Fort Collins: U.S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.Google Scholar
  25. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  26. Montana Department of Natural Resources and Conservation (Montana DNRC). (2014). Montana state water plan draft August 21, 2014. Helena. 28 May 2015.
  27. Murdoch, P. S., Baron, J. S., & Miller, T. L. (2000). Potential effects of climate change on surface-water quality in North America. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 36, 347–366.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. North Dakota Wheat Commission. (2007). Report to the 2007 North Dakota legislative assembly: Economic importance of wheat. 28 May 2015.
  29. Pan, Y., Birdsey, R., Hom, J., & McCullough, K. (2009). Separating effects of changes in atmospheric composition, climate and land-use on carbon sequestration of U.S. mid-Atlantic temperate forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 259, 151–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pan, Y., Birdsey, R. A., Fang, J., et al. (2011). A large and persistent carbon sink in the world’s forests. Science, 333, 988–993.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Polley, H. W., Jin, V. L., & Fay, P. A. (2012). Feedback from plant species change amplifies CO2 enhancement of grassland productivity. Global Change Biology, 18, 2813–2823.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Power, T. M. (1998). Lost landscapes and failed economies: The search for a value of place. Washington, DC: Island Press.Google Scholar
  33. Rasker, R. (1993). A new look at old vistas: The economic role of environmental quality in Western public lands. University of Colorado Law Review, 65, 369–399.Google Scholar
  34. Raymond, C. L., Healey, S. P., Peduzzi, A., & Patterson, P. L. (2015). Representative regional models of post-disturbance forest carbon accumulation: Integrating inventory data and a growth and yield model. Forest Ecology and Management, 336, 21–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Reeves, M. C., & Mitchell, J. E. (2012). A synoptic review of U.S. rangelands: A technical document supporting the Forest Service 2010 RPA assessment (General Technical Report RMRS-GTR-288). Fort Collins: U.S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.Google Scholar
  36. Riebsame, W. E., Hannah, G., Theobald, D., et al. (1997). Atlas of the New West: Portrait of a changing region. New York: Norton.Google Scholar
  37. Rosenzweig, C., Iglesias, A., Yang, X. B., et al. (2000). Climate change and U.S. agriculture: The impacts of warming and extreme weather events on productivity, plant diseases, and pests. Cambridge, MA: Harvard Medical School.Google Scholar
  38. Ryan, M. G., Archer, S. R., Birdsey, R., et al. (2008). Land resources. In M. Walsh, P. Backlund, A. Janetos, & D. Schimel (Eds.), The effects of climate change on agriculture, land resources, water resources, and biodiversity in the United States (pp. 75–120). Washington, DC: Climate Change Science Program, Subcommittee on Global Change Research.Google Scholar
  39. Schindler, D. W., Hecky, R. E., Findlay, D. L., et al. (2008). Eutrophication of lakes cannot be controlled by reducing nitrogen input: Results of a 37-year whole-ecosystem experiment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, USA, 105, 11254–11258.Google Scholar
  40. Sham, C. H., Tuccillo, M. E., & Rooke, J. (2013). Effects of wildfire on drinking water utilities and best practices for wildfire risk reduction and mitigation, Web Report 4482. Denver: Water Research Foundation.Google Scholar
  41. Skog, K. E. (2008). Sequestration of carbon in harvested wood products for the United States. Forest Products Journal, 58, 56–72.Google Scholar
  42. Sorenson, L. G., Goldberg, R., Root, T. L., & Anderson, M. G. (1998). Potential effects of global warming on waterfowl populations breeding in the northern Great Plains. Climatic Change, 40, 343–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stockmann, K., Anderson, N., Young, J., et al. (2014). Estimates of carbon stored in harvested wood products from the U.S. Forest Service Northern Region, 1906–2012 (Unpublished report). Missoula: U.S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research Station.Google Scholar
  44. Thamke, J. N., & Smith, B. D. (2014). Delineation of brine contamination in and near the East Poplar oil field, Fort Peck Indian Reservation, northeastern Montana, 2004–09, U.S. Geological Survey Scientific Investigations Report 2014–5024. Reston: U.S. Geological Survey.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. U.S. Forest Service (USFS). (2009). Watershed and air management, Forest Service Manual 2550, Amendment 2500-2009-1. Washington, DC: U.S. Forest Service.Google Scholar
  46. U.S. Forest Service (USFS). (2015). Baseline estimates of carbon stocks in forests and harvested wood products for National Forest System units, Northern Region (unpublished report). 1 Apr 2016.
  47. Van Vliet, M. T. H., Ludwig, F., Zwolsman, J. J. G., et al. (2011). Global river temperatures and sensitivity to atmospheric warming and changes in river flow. Water Resources Research, 47, W02544.Google Scholar
  48. Wagner, T., Congleton, J. L., & Marsh, D. M. (2004). Smolt-to-adult return rates of juvenile Chinook salmon transported through the Snake-Columbia River hydropower system, USA, in relation to densities of co-transported juvenile steelhead. Fisheries Research, 68, 259–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Warziniack, T. (2014). A general equilibrium model of ecosystem services in a river basin. Journal of the American Water Resources Association, 50, 683–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Woodall, C., Smith, J., & Nichols, M. (2013). Data sources and estimation/modeling procedures for the National Forest System carbon stock and stock change estimates derived from the U.S. National Greenhouse Gas Inventory. 1 Apr 2016.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Travis Warziniack
    • 1
    Email author
  • Megan Lawson
    • 2
  • S. Karen Dante-Wood
    • 3
  1. 1.U.S. Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Research StationFort CollinsUSA
  2. 2.Headwaters EconomicsBozemanUSA
  3. 3.U.S. Forest Service, Office of Sustainability and ClimateWashington, DCUSA

Personalised recommendations