Advertisement

Network Studies in Russia: From Articles to the Structure of a Research Community

  • Daria MaltsevaEmail author
  • Ilia Karpov
Conference paper
Part of the Springer Proceedings in Mathematics & Statistics book series (PROMS, volume 197)

Abstract

Our research focuses on the structure of a research community of Russian scientists involved in network studies, which is studied by means of analysis of articles published in Russian-language journals. The direction of network studies in Russia is quite new form of research methodology—however, in recent years we can observe the growing number of scientists working at this direction and institutionalized forms of their cooperation. Studying the structure of these researchers’ community is important for the fields development. This paper is the first report on the research, that is why it focuses on methodological issues. It covers the description of method of citation (reference) analysis that we use and the process of data collection from eLibrary.ru resource, as well as presents some brief overview of collected data (based on analysis of 8 000 papers). It is concluded by representation of future steps of the research.

Notes

Acknowledgements

The study has been funded by the Russian Academic Excellence Project ‘5–100’ and RFBR grant 16-29-09583 “Methodology, techniques and tools of recognition and counteraction to organized information campaigns on the Internet”. We thank the participants of the Sixth International Conference on Network Analysis NET 2016 and its organizer Laboratory of Algorithms and Technologies for Networks Analysis (LATNA) of National Research University Higher School of Economics (Nizhny Novgorod, Russia) for fruitful discussions and valuable comments on the platform of LATNA Laboratory.

References

  1. 1.
    Barabsi, A.L., Jeong, H., Neda, Z., Ravasz, E., Schubert, A., Vicsek, T.: Evolution of the social network of scientific collaborations. Phys. A 311(34), 590–614 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bar-Ilan, J.: Informetrics at the beginning of the 21st century-a review. J. Inf. 2, 152 (2008)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Belotti, E.: Getting funded: multi-level network of physicists in Italy. Soc. Netw. 34(2), 215–229 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Casey, D.L., McMillan, G.S.: Identifying the “Invisible Colleges” of the “Industrial and Labor Relations Review”: a bibliometric approach. Ind. Lab. Relat. Rev. 62(1), 126–132 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Cronin, B., Atkins, H.: The Web of knowledge-a Festschrift in honor of Eugene Garfield. ASIS Monograph Series. Information Today, Medford (2000)Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    De Bellis, N.: Bibliometrics and Citation Analysis: From the Science Citation Index to Cybermetrics. The Scarecrow Press, 417 p. (2009)Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Devyatko, I.: Sotsiologicheskie teorii deyatel’nosti i prakticheskoy ratsional’nosti [Sociological theories of activity and practical rationality]. Chistie vodi, 336 pp (2003)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Farkas, I., Derenyi, I., Jeong, H., Nda, Z., Oltvai, Z.N., Ravasz, E.: Networks in lifescaling properties and eigenvalue spectra. Phys. A 314(14), 25–34 (2002)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Garfield, E.: Citation Analysis as a Tool in Journal Evaluation. Science New Series 178(4060), 471–479 (1972)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Gradoselskaya, G.: Setevye izmereniya v sotsiologii: Uchebnoe posobie [Network Measurement in Sociology: the textbook], Batygin G.S. (ed.). Publishing House New Textbook, 248 pp (2004)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Groenewegen, P., Hellsten, L., Leydesdorff, L.: Social networks as a looking glass on the social networks community. In: Sunbelt XXXV International Sunbelt Social Network, Abstracts. Hilton Metropole, Brighton, UK, 23–28 June 2015, p. 118 (2015)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Gubanov, D., Novikov, D., Chkhartishvili, A.: Sotsial’nye seti: modeli informatsionnogo vliyaniya, upravleniya i protivoborstva [Social networks: Information models of influence, control and confrontation]. Izdatel’skaya firma “Fiziko-matematicheskaya literatura” M., 228 pp (2010)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hersovici, M., Jacovi, M., Maarek, Y. S., Pelleg, D., Shtalhaim, M., Ur, S. 1998. The shark-search algorithm. An application: tailored Web site mapping. Comput. Netw. ISDN Syst. 30, 317–326 (1998)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hoffman, K., Doucette, L.: A Review of Citation Analysis Methodologies for Collection Management. College and Research Libraries (2012)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hummon, N., Carley, K.: Social networks as normal science. Soc. Netw. 15, 71–106 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kaufman, L., Rousseeuw, P.J.: Finding Groups in Data: An Introduction to Cluster Analysis. Wiley, 368 p. (2005)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kharhordin, O.: Predislovie k Latur B. Nauka v deystvii: sleduya za uchenymi i inzhenerami vnutri obshchestva [Preface to B. Latour, Science in Action: How to Follow Scientists and Engineers through Society] (trans: St.Peter, F.K.). European University in St. Petersburg, pp. 7–19 (2013)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kravchenko, S.: Sotsiologiya: paradigmy cherez prizmu sotsiologicheskogo voobrazheniya: uchebnik [Sociology: paradigm through the prism of sociological imagination: the textbook], 3rd ed. Examen, 750 pp (2007)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Levenshtein, V.I.: Binary codes capable of correcting deletions, insertions, and reversals. Sov. Phys. Dokl. 10(8), 707–710 (1966)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Lewis, K.: Collaboration and acknowledgment in a scientific community. In: Sunbelt XXXV International Sunbelt Social Network, Abstracts. Hilton Metropole, Brighton, UK, 23–28 June 2015, p. 176 (2015)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Leydesdorff, L.: Theories of citations? Scientometrics 43(1), 5–25 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    MacRoberts, M.H., MacRoberts, B.R.: Problems of citation analysis: a critical review. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. (1986–1998) 40(5) (1989)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Moed, H.F.: Citation Analysis in Research Evaluation. Springer, Dortrecht (2005)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Newman, M.E.J.: The structure of scientific collaboration networks. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 98(2), 404409 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Otte, E., Rousseau, R.: Social network analysis. J. Inf. Sci. 28, 441 (2002)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Radaev, V.: Osnovnye napravleniya razvitiya sovremennoy ekonomicheskoy sotsiologii [The main directions of development of modern economic sociology]. In: The book Ekonomicheskaya sotsiologiya: Novye podkhody k institutsional’nomu i setevomu analizu [Economic Sociology: New approaches to institutional and network analysis] (trans: Dobryakova M.S.); M.: POSSPEN, pp. 3–18 (2002)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Safonova, M., Winer, B.: Setevoy analiz sotsitirovaniy etnologicheskikh publikatsiy v rossiyskikh periodicheskikh izdaniyakh: predvaritel’nye rezul’taty [Network analysis of co-citations of ethnological publications in Russian periodicals: preliminary results]. Sotsiologiya: Metodologiya, metody. matematicheskoe modelirovanie 36, 140–176 (2013)Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Smith, L.: Citation analysis. Library Trends (1981)Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Sokolov, M., Safonova, M., Guba, K., Dimke, D. 2012. Intellektual’nyy landshaft i sotsial’naya struktura lokal’nogo akademicheskogo soobshchestva (sluchay peterburgskoy sotsiologii) [Intelligent landscape and social structure of the local academic community (the case of the St. Petersburg Sociology)]. M.: Izd. dom Vysshey shkoly ekonomiki, 48 ppGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Tight, M. Citation and co-citation analysis. In: Brew, A., Lucas, L. (eds.) Academic Research And Researchers: Policy and Practice. Open University Press (2009)Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Vakhshtain, V.: Vozvrashchenie material’nogo. Prostranstva, seti, potoki v aktorno-setevoy teorii [The return of the material. “Spaces”, “networks”, “flows” in the actor-network theory]. Sotsiologicheskoe obozrenie 4(1), 94–115 (2005)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Wagner, C.S., Leydesdorff, L.: Network structure, self-organization, and the growth of international collaboration in science. Res. Policy 34(10), 1608–1618 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Ward, J.H.: Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 58(301), 236–244 (1963)Google Scholar
  34. 34.
    Warner, J.: A critical review of the application of citation studies to the research assessment exercise. J. Inf. Sci. 26, 453 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    White, H.D., Wellman, B., Nazer, N.: Does citation reflect social structure? longitudinal evidence from the Globenet interdisciplinary research group. J. Am. Soc. Inf. Sci. Technol. 55(2), 111–126 (2004)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Winer, B., Divisenko, K.: Kognitivnaya struktura sovremennoy rossiyskoy sotsiologii po dannym zhurnal’nykh ssylok [Cognitive structure of modern Russian sociology according to the journal links]. Zhurnal sotsiologii i sotsial’noy antropologii 4(60) (2012)Google Scholar
  37. 37.
    Zhang, T., Ramakrishnan, R., Livny, M.: BIRCH: an efficient data clustering method for very large databases. In: Proceedings of the 1996 ACM SIGMOD International Conference Management data SIGMOD 96, vol. 1, pp. 103–114 (1996)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.International Laboratory for Applied Network ResearchNational Research University Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations