Advertisement

Constitutive Formulations for Concrete with Recycled Aggregates

  • Antonio Caggiano
  • Guillermo Etse
  • Paula FolinoEmail author
  • Marianela Ripani
  • Sonia Vrech
Chapter
Part of the Research for Development book series (REDE)

Abstract

In this Chapter, a thermodynamically consistent gradient model is proposed for natural aggregate concrete and then, modified to take into account the addition of different contents of recycled aggregates and its influence on concrete mechanical response. A particular and simple form of gradient-based plasticity is considered, where the state variables are the only ones of non-local character. After describing the material formulation for natural and recycled aggregate concretes, the model calibration is performed with experimental data taken from literature. A comprehensive numerical analysis is presented, where the effects of the recycled aggregate content on the performance of concrete in pre and post-peak behavior are evaluated and discussed, for different stress states. Finally, the ability of the model to capture the variation of mechanical response of concrete with different recycled aggregate contents is demonstrated for different mechanical tests.

Keywords

Shear Band Triaxial Compression Recycle Aggregate Recycle Aggregate Concrete Triaxial Compression Test 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Akita H, Koide H, Ojima M (2003) Tensile behavior of a recycled concrete. In: Brandt AM, Ki VC, Marshall IH (eds) Proc. Inter. Symp. Britte Matrix Composites 7. Warsaw, pp 263–268Google Scholar
  2. Bazant ZP, Oh B (1983) Crack band theory for fracture of concrete. RILEM Mater Struct 16:155–177Google Scholar
  3. Du T, Wang W, Liu Z, Lin H, Guo T (2010) The complete stress-strain curve of recycled aggregate concrete under uniaxial compression loading. J Wuhan Univ Technol Mater Sci 25(5):862–865CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Duan K, Hu K, Wittmann FH (2007) Size effect on specific fracture energy of concrete. Engrg Fract Mech 74(1–2):87–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Etse G, Willam K (1994) Fracture energy-based constitutive theory for inelastic behavior of plain concrete. J Eng Mech 120(9):1983–2011Google Scholar
  6. Folino P, Etse G (2011) Validation of the performance dependent failure criterion for concretes. ACI Mater J 108(3):261–269Google Scholar
  7. Folino P, Xargay H (2014) Recycled aggregate concrete—mechanical behavior under uniaxial and triaxial compression. Constr Build Mater 56:21–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Guo Y, Zhang J, Chen G, Xie Z (2014) Compressive behaviour of concrete structures incorporating recycled concrete aggregates, rubber crumb and reinforced with steel fibre, subjected to elevated temperatures. J Clean Prod 72:193–203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hurlbut B (1985) Experimental and computational investigation of strain-softening in concrete. Master’s thesis, University of Colorado, USAGoogle Scholar
  10. Leon A (1935) Ueber das Mass der Anstrenung bei Beton. Ingenieur Archiv 4:421–431CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Li J, Xiao J, Huang J (2010) Microplane model for recycled aggregate concrete. In: 2nd International Conference on waste engineering and management—ICWEM 2010Google Scholar
  12. Li W, Xiao J, Sun Z, Kawashima S, Shah S (2012) Interfacial transition zones in recycled aggregate concrete with different mixing approaches. Constr Build Mater 35:1045–1055CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lu X (2005) Uniaxial and triaxial behavior of high strength concrete with and without steel fibers. PhD thesis, New Jersey Institute of Technology, USAGoogle Scholar
  14. Petersson PE (1981) Crack growth and development of fracture zones in plain concrete and similar materials, report TVBM-1006, technical report. Lund Institute of Technology, SwedenGoogle Scholar
  15. Sfer D, Gettu R, Carol I, Etse G (2002) Experimental study of the triaxial behavior of concrete. J Engrg Mech ASCE 128(2):156–163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Sluys LJ, de Borst R, Muelhaus M (1993) Wave propagation, localization and dispersion in a gradient-dependent medium. Int J Solids Struct 30:1153–1171CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Svedberg T, Runesson K (1997) A thermodynamically consistent theory of gradient-regularized plasticity coupled to damage. Int J of Plast 13(6–7):669–696CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. van Geel E (1998) Concrete behavior in multiaxial compression. Ph.D. thesis, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven, The NetherlandsGoogle Scholar
  19. van Mier J (1997) Fracture processes of concrete. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  20. Vardoulakis I, Aifantis EC (1991) A gradient flow theory of plasticity for granular materials. Acta Mech 87:197–217MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. Vile GWD (1968) The strength of concrete under short-term static biaxial stress. In: International Conference on the structure of concrete. Cement and Concrete Association, London, p 275Google Scholar
  22. Vrech S, Etse G (2009) Gradient and fracture energy-based plasticity theory for quasi-brittle materials like concrete. Comp Meth App Mech Eng 199(1–4):136–147MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. Willam K, Hurbult B, Sture S (1985) Experimental constitutive aspects of concrete failure. In: US−Japan seminar on finite element analysis of reinforced concrete structures. ASCE-Special Publication (Meth Appl Mech Eng 199(1–4):136–147Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Antonio Caggiano
    • 1
    • 3
  • Guillermo Etse
    • 2
    • 3
  • Paula Folino
    • 1
    Email author
  • Marianela Ripani
    • 1
  • Sonia Vrech
    • 2
    • 3
  1. 1.Facultad de IngenieríaUniversidad de Buenos Aires, LMNI-INTECIN (UBA-CONICET)Buenos AiresArgentina
  2. 2.National University of TucumánTucumánArgentina
  3. 3.CONICETBuenos AiresArgentina

Personalised recommendations