Enhancing University Staff Capacities for Critical Inquiry: Organizational Change, Professional Development and Cumulative Powers in Higher Education

Chapter
First Online:
Part of the The Changing Academy – The Changing Academic Profession in International Comparative Perspective book series (CHAC, volume 19)

Abstract

In Asia and beyond, champion-universities seek out talents that break scientific and organizational boundaries, creating openings for new ideas and designs (Chung and Evans 2013; Chen and Chen 2013; Erasmus et al. 2015; Hu et al. 2015). Both academics and administrators are expected to be not only frontline connectors of interdisciplinary cross-institutional R&D projects, but also prime advocates of the ecosystems of innovation (Honey and Kanter 2013; Gastaldi et al. 2015; Kitagawa 2015; Tierney and Lanford 2016). The best universities are often those that not only accumulate talent, but also refine and succeed in retaining it, despite growing competition for high-powered minds and skill-sets (Postiglione and Jung 2013)(). Whereas public demand grows for campuses to more effectively contribute to shaping socio-economic policies and practices, many universities fail to invest adequately and continuously in upgrading the skills of their personnel (Braun et al. 2016). In competitive extractive economies (Acemoglu and Robinson 2012), “championship”-minded universities tend to squeeze as much energy as possible out of their staff, and make them redundant when they burn out. Meanwhile, many campus offices end up with frustrated academics and administrators handling large volumes of useless bureaucracy, while lacking time for mindful engagement with their students. In conditions of neoliberal exploitation of academic labor, many departments prioritize organizational survival over the growth of innovative competencies (Clark 1998, 2001). Academics, as well as administrators, often work in silos (Trowler et al. 2012). They often fall hostage to fears of corporate misjudgment, all the while exacerbating mismatches between the knowledge produced on campuses and societal expectations (Allen and der Velden 2011).Key words: higher education, postgraduate programs, university personnel, professional development

Keywords

Higher education Postgraduate programs University personnel Professional development 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Acemoğlu, D., & Robinson, J. (2012). Why nations fail: The Origins of power, prosperity and poverty. New York: Crown Business.Google Scholar
  2. Aiston, S. J. (2014). Leading the academy or being led? Hong Kong women academics. Higher Education Research & Development, 33(1), 59–72.Google Scholar
  3. Allen, J., & Van der Velden, R. (Eds.). (2011). The flexible professional in the knowledge society: New challenges for higher education. Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
  4. Austin, I., & Jones, G. (2016). Governance of higher education: Global perspectives, theories, and practices. New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  5. Ball, S. (2016, May 10). Neoliberal education and neoliberal education policy: Are we all neoliberals now? Distinguished Lecture. Faculty of Education, University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  6. Beer, L. E., Rodriguez, K., Taylor, C., Martinez-Jones, N., Griffin, J., Smith, T. R., Lamar, M., & Anaya, R. (2015). Awareness, integration and interconnectedness contemplative practices of higher education professionals. Journal of Transformative Education, 13(2), 161–185.Google Scholar
  7. Bess, J. L., & Dee, J. R. (2008). Understanding college and university organization: Dynamics of the system (Vol. 2). Sterling: Stylus Publishing, LLC.Google Scholar
  8. Braun, S., Peus, C., Frey, D., & Knipfer, K. (2016). Leadership in academia: Individual and collective approaches to the quest for creativity and innovation. In Leadership lessons from compelling contexts (pp. 349–365). Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  9. Bray, M. (2015). New directions with UNESCO and more 2010–present. In M. Manzon (Ed.), Changing times, changing territories: Reflections on CERC and the field of comparative education. Hong Kong: CERC University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
  10. Brennan, J., Papatsiba, V., Sousa, S. B., & Hoffman, D. M. (2016). Diversity of higher education institutions in networked knowledge societies: A comparative examination. In D. Hoffman & J. Valimaa (Eds.), Re-becoming universities? Higher education institutions in networked knowledge societies (pp. 115–139). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.Google Scholar
  11. Chan, R. Y. (2016). Understanding the purpose of higher education: An analysis of the economic and social benefits for completing a college degree. Journal of Education Policy, Planning and Administration, 6(5), 1-40. Retrieved from: http://www.jeppa.org.
  12. Chen, I. S., & Chen, J. K. (2013). Present and future: A trend forecasting and ranking of university types for innovative development from an intellectual capital perspective. Quality & Quantity, 47(1), 335–352.Google Scholar
  13. Chun, E., & Evans, A. (2013). The new talent acquisition frontier: Integrating HR and diversity strategy in the private and public sectors and higher education. Sterling: Stylus Publishing, LLC.Google Scholar
  14. Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation (No. 378 CLA).Google Scholar
  15. Clark, B. (2001). The entrepreneurial university: New foundations for collegiality, autonomy, and achievement. Higher Education Management, 13(2).Google Scholar
  16. Erasmus, B. J., Grobler, A., & Van Niekerk, M. (2015). Employee retention in a higher education institution: An organisational development perspective. Progressio, 37(2), 33–63.Google Scholar
  17. Figueiredo, H., Biscaia, R., Rocha, V., & Teixeira, P. (2015). Should we start worrying? Mass higher education, skill demand and the increasingly complex landscape of young graduates’ employment. Studies in Higher Education, pp. 1–20.Google Scholar
  18. Fornari, R., & Pompili, G. (2010). Pursuing quality in mass higher education: The dilemma of equity and excellence in Italy. Italian Journal of Sociology of Education, 2(2), 17–46.Google Scholar
  19. Gastaldi, L., Appio, F. P., Martini, A., & Corso, M. (2015). Academics as orchestrators of continuous innovation ecosystems: Towards a fourth generation of CI initiatives. International Journal of Technology Management, 68(1–2), 1–20.Google Scholar
  20. Gibb, A., Haskins, G., & Robertson, I. (2012). Leading the entrepreneurial university: Meeting the entrepreneurial development needs of higher education institutions. In A. Altmann & B. Eberseberger (Eds.), Universities in change (pp. 9–45). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  21. Guri-Rosenblit, S., Šebková, H., & Teichler, U. (2007). Massification and diversity of higher education systems: Interplay of complex dimensions. Higher Education Policy, 20(4), 373–389.Google Scholar
  22. Hew, K. F., & Cheung, W. S. (2014). Students’ and instructors’ use of massive open online courses (MOOCs): Motivations and challenges. Educational Research Review, 12, 45–58.Google Scholar
  23. Honey, M., & Kanter, D. E. (Eds.). (2013). Design, make, play: Growing the next generation of STEM innovators. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Hu, R., Zhang, H., & Zhu, X. (2015). Demand and supply of human capital and the transformation and development of higher education in the age of mass higher education. In Chinese research perspectives on population and labor (Vol. 2, pp. 158–181). Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  25. Jones, S., Lefoe, G., Harvey, M., & Ryland, K. (2012). Distributed leadership: A collaborative framework for academics, executives and professionals in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 34(1), 67–78.Google Scholar
  26. Kehm, B. M. (2015). Academics and new higher education professionals: Tensions, reciprocal influences and forms of professionalization. In T. Fumasoli, G. Goastellec, & B. Kehm (Eds.), Academic work and careers in Europe: Trends, challenges, perspectives (pp. 177–200). Cham: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  27. Kim, Y., Horta, H., & Jung, J. (2015). Higher education research in Hong Kong, Japan, China, and Malaysia: Exploring research community cohesion and the integration of thematic approaches. Studies in Higher Education, 42(1), 1–20.Google Scholar
  28. Kimmel, S. B., Gaylor, K. P., & Hayes, J. B. (2014). Understanding adult learners by gender. Academy of Educational Leadership Journal, 18(2), 73.Google Scholar
  29. Kirkwood, A., & Price, L. (2014). Technology-enhanced learning and teaching in higher education: What is ‘enhanced’ and how do we know? A critical literature review. Learning, Media and Technology, 39(1), 6–36.Google Scholar
  30. Kitagawa, F. (2015). Research, development and innovation: International, national and regional perspectives. In The Palgrave international handbook of higher education policy and governance (p. 243). New York: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  31. Lai, K. W., & Hong, K. S. (2015). Technology use and learning characteristics of students in higher education: Do generational differences exist? British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(4), 725–738.Google Scholar
  32. Lee, J. J., Cheslock, J., Maldonado-Maldonado, A., & Rhoades, G. (2005). Professors as knowledge workers in the new, global economy. In Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 55–132). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  33. Leišytė, L., & Wilkesmann, U. (Eds.). (2016). Organizing academic work in higher education: teaching, learning and identities. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Lo, W. Y. W. (2015). Revisiting the notion of Hong Kong as a regional education hub. Higher Education Policy, 28(1), 55–68.Google Scholar
  35. Lo, W. Y. W., & Ng, F. S. K. (2015). Trends and developments of higher education research in Hong Kong: In pursuit of a cosmopolitan vision. Higher Education Policy, 28(4), 517–534.Google Scholar
  36. Macfarlane, B. (2011). The morphing of academic practice: Unbundling and the rise of the Para-Academic. Higher Education Quarterly, 65(1), 59–73.Google Scholar
  37. Macfarlane, B. (2013). Intellectual leadership in higher education: Renewing the role of the university professor. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  38. McCaffery, P. (2010). The higher education manager's handbook: Effective leadership and management in universities and colleges. Abingdon: Routledge.Google Scholar
  39. Meek, V. L., Goedegebuure, L., Santiago, R., & Carvalho, T. (2010). The changing dynamics of higher education middle management (Vol. 33). Dordrecht: Springer Science & Business Media.Google Scholar
  40. Middlehurst, R. (2009). Developing higher education professionals. In C. Whitchurch & G. Gordon (Eds.), Academic and professional identities in higher education: The challenges of a diversifying workforce (pp. 223–244). New York/London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  41. Mok, K. H. (2009). Positioning as regional hub of higher education: Changing governance and regulatory reforms in Singapore and Malaysia. International Journal of Education Reform, 17(3), 230–250.Google Scholar
  42. Mok, K. H. (2013). The quest for an entrepreneurial university in East Asia: Impact on academics and administrators in higher education. Asia Pacific Education Review, 14(1), 11–22.Google Scholar
  43. Mok, K. H. (2014). Enhancing quality of higher education for world-class status: Approaches, strategies, and challenges for Hong Kong. Chinese Education & Society, 47(1), 44–64.Google Scholar
  44. Mok, K. H. (2015). Higher education transformations for global competitiveness: Policy responses, social consequences and impact on the academic profession in Asia. Higher Education Policy, 28(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
  45. Mok, K. H. (2016). Massification of higher education, graduate employment and social mobility in the greater China region. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 37(1), 51–71.Google Scholar
  46. Mok, K. H., & Wu, A. M. (2016). Higher education, changing labour market and social mobility in the era of massification in China. Journal of Education and Work, 29(1), 77–97.Google Scholar
  47. Oh, E., & Reeves, T. C. (2014). Generational differences and the integration of technology in learning, instruction, and performance. In Handbook of research on educational communications and technology (pp. 819–828). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  48. Oleksiyenko, A. (2002). Entrepreneurial response of public universities. Professional File 22, Canadian Society for Studies in Higher Education (CSSHE).Google Scholar
  49. Oleksiyenko, A., & Sá, C. M. (2010). Resource asymmetries and cumulative advantages: Canadian and US research universities and the field of global health. Higher Education, 59(3), 367–385.Google Scholar
  50. Oleksiyenko, A. (2012). Resource asymmetries and cumulative advantages in regional knowledge systems: Exploring a University’s growth/share strategy. In Universities and regional development: A critical assessment of tensions and contradictions (pp. 161–178). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  51. Oleksiyenko, A. (2013a). Opportunity structures and higher learning in a globally-connected place: Tensions and ties between outbound and upward mobility. Higher Education, 66, 341–356.Google Scholar
  52. Oleksiyenko, A. (2013b, November 18–20). Science-policy interfaces and academic boundary spanners in a global city: Can internationalized higher learning make local knowledge more salient in times of crises? International Conference “Cities Learning Together: Conference Proceedings”. Melbourne, Australia: RMIT and PASCAL International Observatory, Hong Kong, Hong Kong SAR.Google Scholar
  53. Oleksiyenko, A. (2014). On the shoulders of giants? Global science, resource asymmetries, and repositioning of research universities in China and Russia. Comparative Education Review, 58(3), 482–508.Google Scholar
  54. Oleksiyenko, A. (2015a). Reconciling tensions between excellence, access and equity in multilateral R&D partnerships: A Canadian collaborators’ perspective. Higher Education Policy, 28(2), 197–214.Google Scholar
  55. Oleksiyenko, A. (2015b). Social mobility and stakeholder leverages: Disadvantaged students and “important others” in the “glonacal” construct of higher learning. Education and Society, 33(1), 29–50.Google Scholar
  56. Oleksiyenko, A., Cheng, K. M., & Yip, H. K. (2013). International student mobility in Hong Kong: Private good, public good or trade in services? Studies in Higher Education, 38(7), 1079–1101.Google Scholar
  57. Postiglione, G. A., & Tang, H. H. H. (2008). A preliminary review of the Hong Kong CAP data. In Research Institute for Higher Education (Ed.), The changing academic profession in international comparative and quantitative perspectives (pp. 227–250). Hiroshima: Hiroshima University, Research Institute for Higher Education.Google Scholar
  58. Postiglione, G. A., & Jung, J. (2013). Frameworks for creating research universities: The Hong Kong case. In Institutionalization of world-class university in global competition (pp. 237–254). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  59. Pucciarelli, F., & Kaplan, A. (2016). Competition and strategy in higher education: Managing complexity and uncertainty. Business Horizons. Online http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0007681316000045
  60. Rhoades, G., & Slaughter, S. (1997). Academic capitalism, managed professionals, and supply-side higher education. Social Text, 51, 9–38.Google Scholar
  61. Ros, V., & Oleksiyenko, A. (2017). Policy Misalignments and Development Challenges in the Cambodian Academic Profession: Insights from Public University Lecturers. Higher Education Policy, 1–17. doi: 10.1057/s41307-017-0043-y
  62. Sá, C. M., & Oleksiyenko, A. (2011). Between the local and the global: Organized research units and international collaborations in the health sciences. Higher Education, 62(3), 367–382.Google Scholar
  63. Schneijderberg, C., & Merkator, N. (2013). The new higher education professionals. In B. Kehm & U. Teichler (Eds.), The academic profession in Europe: New tasks and new challenges (pp. 53–92). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  64. Tierney, W. G., & Lanford, M. (2016). Conceptualizing innovation in higher education. In Higher education: Handbook of theory and research (pp. 1–40). Dordrecht: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  65. Trowler, P., Saunders, M., & Bamber, V. (Eds.). (2012). Tribes and territories in the 21st century: Rethinking the significance of disciplines in higher education. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  66. Wang, X. (2010). Higher education as a field of study in China: Defining knowledge and curriculum structure. Lanham: Rowman and Littlefield Publishers.Google Scholar
  67. Winter, R. (2009). Academic manager or managed academic? Academic identity schisms in higher education. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 31(2), 121–131.Google Scholar
  68. Yang, R. (2012). Academic entrepreneurialism in a context of altered governance: Some reflections of higher education in Hong Kong. Globalisation, Societies and Education, 10(3), 387–402.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of EducationThe University of Hong KongPokfulamHong Kong

Personalised recommendations