The Sulfur Pathway and Diagnosis of Sulfate Depletion in Grapevine

  • Sílvia Tavares
  • Sara AmâncioEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Proceedings of the International Plant Sulfur Workshop book series (PIPSW)


Sulfur is an essential nutrient to all plant species. Plants assimilate sulfur in a well-described pathway, which has been taken up by roots. Regulatory mechanism has been the subject of many research papers. However, recent studies highlighted differences between crop plants and the model plant Arabidopsis thaliana. Our work focuses on the identification of genes involved in the sulfur metabolism in the Vitis vinifera genome, and their response to sulfur deficiency and other abiotic stress endured by grapevine in the field, namely water stress. Here, we describe the identification and brief characterization of the first assimilation enzymes involved in the sulfur pathway, the enzyme responsible for sulfur activation, ATP sulfurylase (ATPS), and the two enzymes that reduce sulfate to sulfide, Adenosine 5′-phosphosulate reductase (APR) and Sulfite reductase (SiR). A reduction was observed in the number of ATPS and APR isoforms identified in V. vinifera genome when compared to A. thaliana or Glycine max genomes. Two ATPS isoforms were present in the Vitis genome, of which only ATPS1 transcript was detected in the tested tissues, and one APR isoform, suggesting an absence of redundancy in the role of both enzymes. ATPS1, APR and SiR transcript level was up-regulated in response to 2 days exposure to sulfur deficiency in V. vinifera cell cultures, which was completely reversed by the addition of GSH to the culture medium. Apparently, oxidative stress triggered GSH has a pivotal role in the regulation of ATPS1, APR and SiR transcription level, since their up-regulation was observed in mRNA from field grapevine berries under water stress, which is known to induce oxidative stress.


Transit Peptide Sulfate Transporter Vitis Species Deficient Medium Sulfite Reductase 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Amâncio S, Tavares S, Fernandes JC, Sousa C (2009) Grapevine & sulfur: old partners, new achievements. In: Roubelakis-Angelakis KA (ed) Grapevine molecular physiology & biotechnology. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 31–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anjum NA, Gill R, Kaushik M, Hasanuzzaman M, Pereira E, Ahmad I, Gill SS (2015) ATP-sulfurylase, sulfur-compounds, and plant stress tolerance. Front Plant Sci 6:210PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  3. Bohrer AS, Yoshimoto N, Sekiguchi A, Rykulski N, Saito K, Takahashi H (2015) Alternative translational initiation of ATP sulfurylase underlying dual localization of sulfate assimilation pathways in plastids and cytosol in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front Plant Sci 5:750PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  4. Clarkson DT, Hawkesford MJ, Davidian J-C (1993) Membrane and long-distance transport of sulfate. In: De Kok LJ, Stulen I, Rennenberg H, Brunold C, Rausen WE (eds) Sulfur nutrition and sulfur assimilation in higher plants: fundamental environmental and agricultural aspects. SPB Academic Publishing, The Hague, pp 3–19Google Scholar
  5. Clarkson DT, Diogo E, Amâncio S (1999) Uptake and assimilation of sulphate by sulphur deficient Zea mays cells: the role of O-acetyl-L-serine in the interaction between nitrogen and sulphur assimilatory pathways. Plant Physiol Biochem 37:283–290CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Coito JL, Rocheta M, Carvalho L, Amâncio S (2012) Microarray-based uncovering reference genes for quantitative real time PCR in grapevine under abiotic stress. BMC Res Notes 5:220CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Dai X, Zhao PX (2011) psRNATarget: a plant small RNA target analysis server. Nucleic Acids Res 39:W155–W159CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  8. Fletcher JS, Johnson FL, McFarlane JC (1990) Influence of greenhouse versus field testing and taxonomic differences on plant sensitivity to chemical treatment. Environ Toxicol Chem 9:169–776CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Grimplet J, Deluc LG, Tillett RL, Wheatley MD, Schlauch KA, Cramer GR, Cushman JC (2007) Tissue-specific mRNA expression profiling in grape berry tissues. BMC Genomics 8:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Guillaumie S, Fouquet R, Kappel C, Camps C, Terrier N, Moncomble D, Delrot S (2011) Transcriptional analysis of late ripening stages of grapevine berry. BMC Plant Biol 11:165CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Hannah L, Roehrdanz PR, Ikegami M, Shepard AV, Shaw MR et al (2013) Climate change, wine, and conservation. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 110:6907–6912CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Hatzfeld Y, Lee S, Lee M, Leustek T, Saito K (2000) Functional characterization of a gene encoding a fourth ATP sulfurylase isoform from Arabidopsis thaliana. Gene 248:51–58CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Hell R, Kruse C (2007) Sulfur in biotic interactions of plants. In: Hawkesford MJ, De Kok LJ (eds) Sulfur in plants an ecological perspective. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 197–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kawashima CG, Yoshimoto N, Maruyama-Nakashita A, Tsuchiya YN, Saito K, Takahashi H, Dalmay T (2009) Sulphur starvation induces the expression of microRNA-395 and one of its target genes but in different cell types. Plant J 57:313–321CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Kopriva S, Wiedemann G, Reski R (2007) Sulfate assimilation in basal land plants-what does genomic sequencing tell us? Plant Biol 9:556–564CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Kopriva S, Mugford SG, Matthewman C, Koprivova A (2009) Plant sulfate assimilation genes: redundancy versus specialization. Plant Cell Rep 28:1769–1780CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Leustek T, Saito K (1999) Sulfate transport and assimilation in plants. Plant Physiol 120:637–644CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Leustek T, Martin MN, Bick JA, Davies JP (2000) Pathways and regulation of sulfur metabolism revealed through molecular and genetic studies. Annu Rev Plant Physiol Plant Mol Biol 51:141–165CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Lopes CM, Santos TP, Monteiro A, Rodrigues ML, Costa JM, Chaves MM (2011) Combining cover cropping with deficit irrigation in a Mediterranean low vigor vineyard. Sci Hortic 129:603–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Loudet O, Saliba-Colombani V, Camilleri C, Calenge F, Gaudon V, Koprivova A, Daniel-Vedele F (2007) Natural variation for sulfate content in Arabidopsis thaliana is highly controlled by APR2. Nat Genet 39:896–900CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lunn JE, Droux M, Martin J, Douce R (1990) Localization of ATP sulfurylase and O-acetylserine (thiol) lyase in spinach leaves. Plant Physiol 94:1345–1352CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Marchler-Bauer A, Lu S, Anderson JB, Chitsaz F, Derbyshire MK, DeWeese-Scott C, Gwadz M (2011) CDD: a conserved domain database for the functional annotation of proteins. Nucleic Acids Res 39:D225–D229CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Rocheta M, Becker JD, Coito JL, Carvalho L, Amâncio S (2014) Heat and water stress induce unique transcriptional signatures of heat-shock proteins and transcription factors in grapevine. Funct Integr Genomics 14:135–148CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Rotte C, Leustek T (2000) Differential subcellular localization and expression of ATP sulfurylase and 5-adenylylsulfate reductase during ontogenesis of Arabidopsis leaves indicates that cytosolic and plastid forms of ATP sulfurylase may have specialized functions. Plant Physiol 124:715–724CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Shibagaki N, Grossman A (2008) The state of sulfur metabolism in algae: from ecology to genomics. In: Hell R, Dahl C, Knaff D, Leustek T (eds) Advances in photosynthesis and respiration: sulfur metabolism in phototrophic organisms. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 231–267CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Takahashi H, Kopriva S, Giordano M, Saito K, Hell R (2011) Sulfur assimilation in photosynthetic organisms: molecular functions and regulations of transporters and assimilatory enzymes. Annu Rev Plant Biol 62:157–184CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Tavares S, Sousa C, Carvalho LC, Amâncio S (2008) De-repressed transporters are strongly repressed after sulfate addition to sulfur depleted Vitis cells. Int J Plant Sci 169:987–997CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Tavares S, Vesentini D, Fernandes JC, Ferreira RB, Laureano O, Ricardo-Da-Silva JM, Amâncio S (2013) Vitis vinifera secondary metabolism as affected by sulfate depletion: diagnosis through phenylpropanoid pathway genes and metabolites. Plant Physiol Biochem 66:118–126CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Tavares S, Wirtz M, Beier MP, Bogs J, Hell R, Amâncio S (2015) Characterization of the serine acetyltransferase gene family of Vitis vinifera uncovers differences in regulation of OAS synthesis in woody plants. Front Plant Sci 6:74CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  30. Vauclare P, Kopriva S, Fell D, Suter M, Sticher L, Von Ballmoos P, Brunold C (2002) Flux control of sulphate assimilation in Arabidopsis thaliana: adenosine 5′-phosphosulphate reductase is more susceptible than ATP sulphurylase to negative control by thiols. Plant J 31:729–740CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Velasco R, Zharkikh A, Troggio M, Cartwright DA, Cestaro A et al (2007) A high quality draft consensus sequence of the genome of a heterozygous grapevine variety. PLoS One 2(12), e1326CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Williams JS, Cooper RM (2004) The oldest fungicide and newest phytoalexin – a reappraisal of the fungitoxicity of elemental sulphur. Plant Pathol 53:263–279CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Yi H, Ravilious GE, Galant A, Krishnan HB, Jez JM (2010) From sulfur to homoglutathione: thiol metabolism in soybean. Amino Acids 39:963–978CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.LEAF, Instituto Superior de AgronomiaUniversidade de LisboaLisboaPortugal

Personalised recommendations