Inequalities in the Appropriation of Digital Spaces in Metropolitan Areas of Latin America

  • Roxana BarrantesEmail author
  • Eduardo Vargas


This study discusses the role of information and communication technologies (ICTs), especially the Internet, in three Latin American capitals in people’s ability to attain the lifestyle they value and how inequalities in this ability or “information richness” can be explained by sociodemographic characteristics that do not depend on the individual’s decisions. The analysis is conducted using an Information Richness Index that includes information about the three barriers that people face in making significant use of the Internet: access to the Internet, skills for using ICTs, and the ability to function well in digital environments. Econometric estimations show that women, people who are not active in the workforce, and older adults, particularly senior citizens, have lower IRI levels, while each additional year of education and belonging to learning communities have a positive effect on the level a person achieves.


ICT4D Open development Digital inequality Latin America Metropolitan cities 


  1. 1.
    Smith, M. L., Elder, L., & Emdon, H. (2011a). Open development: A new theory for ICT4D. Information Technologies and International Development, 7(1), iii–iix.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Robinson, L., Cotten, S. R., Ono, H., Quan-Haase, A., Mesch, G., Chen, W., & Stern, M. J. (2015). Digital inequalities and why they matter. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Stewart, F. (2005). Horizontal inequalities: A neglected dimension of development. WIDER perspectives on global development. UK: Palgrave MacMillan.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Instituto Nacional de Estadística e Informática.
  6. 6.
    Mendonça, S., Crespo, N., & Simões, N. (2015). Inequality in the network society: An integrated approach to ICT access, basic skills, and complex capabilities. Telecommunications Policy, 39, 192–207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Barrantes, R., Agüero, A., & Vargas, E. (2015a). La conectividad urbana en América Latina: Una mirada a Buenos Aires (In Spanish). Dialogo Regional Sobre Sociedad de la Información. Available at:
  8. 8.
    Barrantes, R., Agüero, A., & Vargas, E. (2015b). La conectividad urbana en América Latina: Una mirada a Lima (In Spanish). Dialogo Regional Sobre Sociedad de la Información. Available at:
  9. 9.
    Barrantes, R., Agüero, A., & Vargas, E. (2015c). La conectividad urbana en América Latina: Una mirada a Ciudad de Guatemala (In Spanish). Dialogo Regional Sobre Sociedad de la Información. Available at:
  10. 10.
    Castells, M. (2011). The rise of the network society: The information age: Economy, society, and culture (Vol. 1). Wiley, Oxford, UK.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Smith, M. L., Spence, R., & Rashid, A. T. (2011b). Mobile phones and expanding human capabilities. Information Technologies and International Development, 7(3), 77.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Chahuara, P., & Trelles, J. (2014). Impactos heterogéneos del acceso a Internet sobre el Bienestar: Evidencia a partir de Microdatos en el Perú (In Spanish). Lima: OSIPTEL.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Huaroto, C. (2011). Efecto de la Adopción del Internet en la productividad de las MYPES en el Perú (In Spanish). Tesis de Lic., Lima: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Smith, M. L., Reilly, K. M., & Benkler, Y. (2014). Open development: Networked innovations in international development. Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Internatiotional Telecommunication Union.
  16. 16.
    Benkler, Y. (2006). The wealth of networks: How social production transforms markets and freedom. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kleine, D. (2013). Technologies of choice?: ICTs, development, and the capabilities approach. Cambridge, MA/Boston: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Agostini, C., & Willington, M. (2012). Acceso y uso de internet en Chile: evolución y factores determinantes. Persona y sociedad, 26(1), 11–42.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Díaz, R., Messano, O. A., & Petrissans, R. (2003). La brecha digital y sus repercusiones en los países miembros de la Aladi (In Spanish). ALADI/SEC/Estudio, 157.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    World Bank (2002). Superar la brecha digital en las Américas (In Spanish).Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Tongia, R., & Wilson III, E. J. (2011). Network theory: The flip side of Metcalfe’s law: Multiple and growing costs of network exclusion. International Journal of Communication, 5, 17.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Hargittai, E., & Shafer, S. (2006). Differences in actual and perceived online skills: The role of gender. Social Science Quarterly, 87(2), 432–448.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Ono, H., & Zavodny, M. (2003). Gender and the Internet. Social Science Quarterly, 84(1), 111–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Barbosa, B., & Amaro, F. (2012). Too old for technology? How the elderly of Lisbon use and perceive ICT. Journal of Community Informatics, 8(1),
  25. 25.
    Barrantes, R., & Cozzubo, A. (2015). Edad para aprender, edad para enseñar: el rol del aprendizaje intergeneracional intrahogar en el uso de la Internet por parte de los adultos mayores en Latinoamérica (In Spanish). Lima: Pontificia Universidad Católica del Perú.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Castellón, L., & Jaramillo, O. (2002). Las múltiples dimensiones de la brecha digital (In Spanish). Reflexiones académicas (Vol. 13).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Colombo, F., Aroldi, P., & Carlo, S. (2015). Nuevos mayores, viejas brechas: TIC, desigualdad y bienestar en la tercera edad en Italia (In Spanish). Comunicar: Revista Científica de Comunicación y Educación, 23(45), 47–55.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Prensky, M. (2001). Nativos digitales, inmigrantes digitales (In Spanish). On the Horizon, 9(6):1–6.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Navarro, L. (2010). The impact of internet use on individual earnings in Latin America (No. 2010/11). Development Research Working Paper Series.Google Scholar
  30. 30.
    Witte, J. C., & Mannon, S. E. (2010). The internet and social inequalities. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hargittai, E., & Hinnant, A. (2008). Digital inequality differences in young adults’ use of the Internet. Communication Research, 35(5), 602–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Helsper, E., & Galacz, A. (2009). Understanding the links between social and digital exclusion in Europe. World wide internet. Changing societies, economies and cultures. Macau: University of Macau.Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Howard, P. E., Rainie, L., & Jones, S. (2001). Days and nights on the internet the impact of a diffusing technology. The American Behavioral Scientist, 45(3), 383–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Villatoro, P., & Silva, A. (2005). Estrategias, programas y experiencias de superación de la brecha digital y universalización del acceso a las nuevas tecnologías de información y comunicación (TIC): un panorama regional (In Spanish) vol. 101. United Nations Publications.Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    Minges, M. (2005). Evaluation of e-readiness indices in Latin America and the Caribbean. Santiago: ECLAC. Available at: (Consulted: 29 April 2015).
  36. 36.
    Organismo Supervisor de Inversión Privada en Telecomunicaciones.
  37. 37.
  38. 38.
    Greene, W. H. (2003). Econometric analysis. India: Pearson Education.Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    May, J. Dutton, V., & Muntakazi, L. (2014). Information and communication technologies as a pathway from poverty: Evidence from East Africa. In Adera, et al. (Ed.), ICT Pathways to Poverty Reduction: Empirical Evidence from East and Southern Africa (p. 33–76). Ottawa: International Development Research Centre.Google Scholar
  40. 40.
    Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27, 425–478.Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Cameron, A. C., & Trivedi, P. K. (2010). Microeconometrics using stata. College Station: Stata press.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 47, 153–161.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Peruvian StudiesLimaPeru
  2. 2.Pontifical Catholic University of PeruLimaPeru

Personalised recommendations