Advertisement

Modelling of the Quickness Test of Sensitive Clays Using the Generalized Interpolation Material Point Method

  • Quoc Anh TranEmail author
  • Wojciech Solowski
  • Vikas Thakur
  • Minna Karstunen
Chapter
Part of the Advances in Natural and Technological Hazards Research book series (NTHR, volume 46)

Abstract

The presence of the sensitive clays in Scandinavia and Canada creates quick clay landslide hazards. The ability to predict the likelihood of such landslides occurrence, as well as their outreach would reduce the damage to the infrastructures and loss of life. Recently, a simple experimental technique named a quickness test (Thakur V, Degago S, Geotech Lett 2:87–95, 2012) has been employed to investigate the susceptibility of the clay to create large retrogression landslides. In this paper, we applied Generalized Interpolation Material Point Method (a numerical method suitable for large displacement dynamic problems) to replicate the quickness test experiment. The primary goal of the presented simulations is to further validate the modelling technique and the constitutive model used. In particular, the computations suggest the importance of the strain rates for the prediction of the run-out distance of the remoulded sensitive clays.

Keywords

Material point method Quickness test Sensitive clays 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The authors gratefully acknowledge constructive reviewing on the paper by Mr. Lars Andresen. The work has been funded by the Academy of Finland under the project ‘Progressive failure and post-failure modelling of slopes with Generalized Interpolation Material Point Method (GIMP)’ under decision number 286628.

References

  1. Badenhagen SG, Kober EM (2004) The generalized interpolation material point method. Comput Model Eng Sci 5:477–495Google Scholar
  2. Boukpeti N, White DJ, Randolph MF et al (2012) Strength of fined-grained soils at the solid-fluid transition. Geotechnique 62(3):213–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bui HH, Fukagawa R, Sako K et al (2008) Lagrangian meshfree particles method (SPH) for large deformation and failure flows of geomaterial using elastic-plastic soil constitutive model. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 32:1537–1570CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Einav I, Randolph M (2006) Effect of strain rate on mobilized strength and thickness of curved shear bands. Geotechnique 56(7):501–504CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Fern EJ, Soga K (2016) The role of constitutive models in MPM simulations of granular column collapses. Acta Geotech 11(3):659–678CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Hazell E (2008) Numerical and experimental studies of shallow cone penetration in clay. Dissertation, University of Oxford, UKGoogle Scholar
  7. Koumoto T, Houlsby GT (2001) Theory and practice of the fall cone test. Geotechnique 51(8):701–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Lansivaara T (1999) A study of the mechanical behaviour of soft clay. Dissertatioon, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, NorwayGoogle Scholar
  9. Lee H, Chough SK (1987) Bulk density, void ratio, and porosity determined from average grain density and water content: an evaluation of errors. Mar Geol 7(1):53–62Google Scholar
  10. Lefebvre G, LeBoeuf D (1987) Rate effects and cyclic loading of sensitive clays. J Geotech Eng 113(5):476–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Lehane BM, Loughlin CD, Gaudin C, Randolph MF (2009) Rate effects on penetrometer resistance in kaolin. Geotechnique 59(1):41–52CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Leroueil S, Tavenas F, Le Bihan J (1983) Propriétés caracteristiqués des argiles de l’est du Canada. Can Geotech J 20:681–705CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Leroueil S, Kabbaj M, Tavenas F et al (1985) Stress-strain-strain rate relation for the compressibility of sensitive natural clays. Geotechnique 35(2):159–180CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Locat J, Demers D (1988) Viscosity, yield stress, remolded strength, and liquidity index relationships for sensitive clays. Can Geotech J 25:799–806CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lube G, Huppert HE, Sparks RS (2005) Collapses of two dimensional granular columns. Phys Rev E 72(041301)Google Scholar
  16. Mitchell RJ, Markell AR (1974) Flowsliding in sensitive soils. Can Geotech J 11(1):11–31CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Mitchell JK, Soga K (2005) Fundamentals of soil behaviour, 3rd edn. Wiley, New York/ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  18. Nicot F, Darve F (2011) Diffuse and localized failure modes: two competing mechanisms. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 35:586–601CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Quinn T (2013) Rate effects in fine grained soils. Dissertation, University of Dundee, UKGoogle Scholar
  20. Robinson S, Brown MJ (2013) Rate effects at varying strain levels in fine grained soils. 18th conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, Paris, France, 2013Google Scholar
  21. Solowski W, Sloan S (2015) Evaluation of material point method for use in geotechnics. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 39:685–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sulsky D, Zhou SJ, Schreyer HL (1995) Application of a particle-in-cell method to solid mechanics. Comput Phys Commun 87:236–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Thakur V, Degago S (2012) Quickness of sensitive clays. Geotech Lett 2:87–95CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Thakur V, Degago S (2014) Quickness test approach for assessment of flow slide potentials. Geotech Eng J SEAGS & AGSSEA 45(1):85–94Google Scholar
  25. Thakur V, Degago A, Oset F et al. (2013) A new approach to assess the potential for flow slide in sensitive clays. 18th international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering. France, September 2013Google Scholar
  26. Tran QA, Solowski W, Karstunen M et al. (2017) Modelling of fall-cone tests with strain-rate effects. 1st international conference on the material point method, Delft, January 2017Google Scholar
  27. Utili S, Zhao T, Houlsby GT (2015) 3D DEM investigation of granular column collapse: evaluation of debris motion and its destructive power. Eng Geol 186:3–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Quoc Anh Tran
    • 1
    Email author
  • Wojciech Solowski
    • 1
  • Vikas Thakur
    • 2
  • Minna Karstunen
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Civil EngineeringAalto UniversityEspooFinland
  2. 2.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringNorwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)TrondheimNorway
  3. 3.Department of Civil and Environmental EngineeringChalmers University of TechnologyGothenburgSweden

Personalised recommendations