Advertisement

Sustainable Disaster Risk Reduction in Mountain Agriculture: Agroforestry Experiences in Kaule, Mid-Hills of Nepal

  • A. SchickEmail author
  • E. Wieners
  • N. Schwab
  • Udo SchickhoffEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Sustainable Development Goals Series book series (SDGS)

Abstract

Modernization as a transformational strategy towards sustainable development has to promote further improvement of mountain farmers’ livelihoods while at the same time ensuring ecological sustainability and inducing social equity. In this context, a multiyear joint project with local farmers was launched in spring 2009 to introduce agroforestry practices in the village Kaule, Nuwakot District, mid-hills of Nepal. Practical components of the project included trainings and workshops on agroforestry, restructuring of terrace fields for conversion to agroforestry, and monthly meetings for open discussions among involved households. The project was accompanied scientifically to analyse socio-economic and ecological impacts. This paper presents scientific findings, summarizes the experiences during the transition to sustainable land management from an interdisciplinary perspective and gives evidence of increased willingness to adopt sustainable agricultural practices and the obtainment of environmental benefits and increased livelihood security. Participation of the farmers in the entire process, beginning with the definition of goals, the envisioning of a desired future and the integration of local knowledge, skills and resources were found to be of key importance for the project success. During the transition process, a diversification of marketable crops and additional income generation further enhanced the willingness to adopt new agricultural practices. After the adoption of agroforestry, soil quality and soil productivity have been significantly ameliorated, with positive effects appearing shortly after the conversion from conventional monocropping systems. We also assessed significantly higher species richness, beta diversity and cover of trees and shrubs in the agroforestry system. We conclude that the transition from conventional terrace cultivation to agroforestry practices has the potential to generate significant environmental and socio-economic benefits, thus contributing to sustainable modernization processes and disaster risk reduction in mountain agriculture.

Keywords

Agroforestry Soil fertility Sustainability Modernization Mountain agriculture Innovation diffusion Transition management Backcasting 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank all involved farmer families in Kaule for their hospitality and unconditional sharing of their knowledge on agriculture. We are also grateful to the foundation “Ein Körnchen Reis” as well as to “action five e.V. Bonn”, “Deutsche Umwelthilfe”, “Rapunzel Naturkost”, “Deutsche Gesellschaft für Internationale Zusammenarbeit” (GIZ) and “weltwärts” for financial support of the project. “Kaule e.V.—Organisation for Socially Sustainable Agro-Projects” provided extensive logistical support. We highly appreciate the support of Pema Sherpa, Yujin Sita Tamang, and Tilak B. Lama for project management and support, and thank Keshab Raj Pande, Ritesh Karel and Badri Rai for assistance in administrative issues. Training on agroforestry was given by the “Nepal Agroforestry Foundation”. Alina Schick was funded by a short-term scholarship of the “Stiftung fiat panis” in Ulm, Eva Wieners by “The University of Hamburg Center for a Sustainable University” (KNU), a University of Hamburg scholarship (HmbNFG) and “The German Academic Exchange Service” (DAAD).

References

  1. Acharya KP (2006) Linking trees on farms with biodiversity conservation in subsistence farming systems in Nepal. Biodivers Conserv 15:631–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Albrecht H (1964) Die Bedeutung von Demonstrationsbetrieben als eine Form der landwirtschaftlichen Entwicklungshilfe. Zeitschrift für Ausländische Landwirtschaft 2:1–24Google Scholar
  3. Amatya SM (1996) Prevailing agroforestry systems and practices in Nepal. In: Koppelman R, Lai CK, Durst PB, Naewboonien J (eds) Asia-Pacific Agroforestry Profiles, APAN Field Document No. 4/RAP Publication 1996/20, pp. 11–16Google Scholar
  4. Amatya SM, Newman SM (1993) Agroforestry in Nepal: research and practice. Agrofor Sys 21:215–222Google Scholar
  5. Bamberger M (1991) The importance of community participation. Public Adm Dev 11(3):281–284CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bardsley D (2003) Risk alleviation via in situ agrobiodiversity conservation: drawing from experiences in Switzerland, Turkey and Nepal. Agr Ecosyst Environ 99:149–157CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bista P, Ghimire R, Shah SC, Pande KR (2010) Assessment of soil fertility management practices and their constraints in different geographic locations of Nepal. Forum Geografic 9:41–48Google Scholar
  8. Carlsson-Kanyama A, Dreborg KH, Moll HC, Padovan D (2008) Participative backcasting: a tool for involving stakeholders in local sustainability planning. Futures 40(1):34–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cash DW, Clark WC, Alcock F, Dickson NM, Eckley N, Guston DH, Jäger J, Mitchell RB (2003) Knowledge systems for sustainable development. Proc Natl Acad Sci 100(14):8086–8091CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. CBS (Central Bureau of Statistics) (2012) Environment statistics of Nepal (2011). Government of Nepal CBS, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  11. Conning J, Udry C (2007) Rural financial markets in developing countries. Handb Agric Econ, North Holland 3:2857–2908CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dahal BM, Nyborg I, Sitaula BK, Bajracharya RM (2009) Agricultural intensification: food insecurity to income security in a mid-hill watershed of Nepal. Int J Agric Sustain 7:249–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dhakal A, Cockfield G, Maraseni TN (2012) Evolution of agroforestry based farming systems: a study of Dhanusha District, Nepal. Agroforestry Sys 86:17–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. eFloras (2008) Missouri Botanical Garden, St. Louis, MO & Harvard University Herbaria, Cambridge, MA. www.efloras.org. Accessed 21 Apr 2015
  15. Ellis F (2000) The determinants of rural livelihood diversification in developing countries. J Agric Econ 51:289–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ellis F, Biggs S (2001) Evolving themes in rural development 1950s–2000s. Dev Policy Rev 19:437–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Elsass PM, Veiga JF (1994) Acculturation in acquired organizations: a force-field perspective. Hum Relat 47(4):431–453CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fageria NK (2012) Role of soil organic matter in maintaining sustainability of cropping systems. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 43:2063–2113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gardner RAM, Gerrard AJ (2003) Runoff and soil erosion on cultivated rainfed terraces in the middle hills of Nepal. Appl Geogr 23:23–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gautam R, Sthapit B, Subedi A, Poudel D, Shrestha P, Eyzaguirre P (2009) Home gardens management of key species in Nepal: a way to maximize the use of useful diversity for the well-being of poor farmers. Plant Genet Resour 7:142–153CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ghimire R, Bista P (2016) Crop diversification improves pH in acidic soils. J Crop Improv 30:657–667. doi: 10.1080/15427528.2016.1219894 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gilmour DA (1989) Increase in tree cover on private farm land in central Nepal. Mt Res Dev 9:381–391CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Giraudoux P (2015) Pgirmess: data analysis in ecology. R package version 1.6.2. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=pgirmess. Accessed 12 June 2015
  24. Gleeson T, Alley WM, Allen DM, Sophocleous MA, Zhou Y, Taniguchi M, VanderSteen J (2012) Towards sustainable groundwater use: setting long term goals, backcasting, and managing adaptively. Ground Water 50(1):19–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Henrich J (2001) Cultural transmission and the diffusion of innovations: adoption dynamics indicate that biased cultural transmission is the predominate force in behavioral change. Am Anthropol 103(4):992–1013CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hoffmann V, Gerster-Bentaya M, Christinck A, Lemma M (2009) Handbook: rural extension volume 1: basic issues and concepts. Margraf Publishers, Weikersheim, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  27. Huber J (2000) Towards industrial ecology: sustainable development as a concept of ecological modernization. J Environ Planning Policy Manage 2:269–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Immink MDC, Alarcon JA (1993) Household income, food availability, and commercial crop production by smallholder farmers in the western highlands of Guatemala. Econ Dev Cult Change 41(2):319–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Jose S (2009) Agroforestry for ecosystem services and environmental benefits: an overview. Agrofor Syst 76:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kollmair M (1999) Futterbäume in Nepal: Traditionelles Wissen, Stellenwert in kleinbäuerlichen Betrieben und räumliche Verteilung. LIT Verlag, Münster, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  31. Lamichhane K (2013) Effectiveness of sloping agricultural land technology on soil fertility status of mid-hills in Nepal. J Forest Res 24:767–775CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Loorbach D (2010) Transition management for sustainable development: a prescriptive, complexity-based governance framework. Governance 23(1):161–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Loorbach DA, Rotmans J (2006) Managing transitions for sustainable development. In: Olshoorn X, Wieczorek AJ (eds) Understanding industrial transformation: views from different disciplines. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 187–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Matson PA, Parton WJ, Power AG, Swift MJ (1997) Agricultural intensification and ecosystem properties. Science 277:504–509CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Merz J, Dangol PM, Dhakal MP, Dongol BS, Nakarmi G, Weingartner R (2006) Rainfall-runoff events in a middle mountain catchment of Nepal. J Hydrol 331:446–458CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Nair PKR, Garrity D (eds) (2012) Agroforestry—the future of global land use. Springer, DordrechtGoogle Scholar
  37. Nuberg I, George B, Reid R (eds) (2009) Agroforestry for natural resource management. CSIRO, CollingwoodGoogle Scholar
  38. Panday K (1982) Fodder trees and tree fodder in Nepal. Swiss Federal Institute of Forestry Research, Birmensdorf, SwitzerlandGoogle Scholar
  39. Peake S (1994) Transport in transition: lessons from the history of energy. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  40. Powlson DS, Gregory PJ, Whalley WR, Quinton JN, Hopkins DW, Whitmore AP, Hirsch PR, Goulding KWT (2011) Soil management in relation to sustainable agriculture and ecosystem services. Food Policy 36(Suppl. 1):S72–S87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Raut N, Sitaula BK, Aune JB, Bajracharya RM (2011) Evolution and future direction of intensified agriculture in the central mid-hills of Nepal. Int J Agric Sustain 9:537–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. R Core Team (2014) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R foundation for statistical computing. http://www.R-project.org/. Accessed 12 Dec 2014
  43. Reid D (1995) Sustainable development: an introductory guide. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  44. Rogers EM (2003) Diffusion of innovations, 5th edn. The Free Press of Glencoe, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  45. Schick A (2015) Conversion of subsistence farming to sustainable agroforestry in the Midhills of Nepal—participatory action research in system development. Ph.D. Thesis, University of Hohenheim, GermanyGoogle Scholar
  46. Schwab N, Schickhoff U, Fischer E (2015) Transition to agroforestry significantly improves soil quality: a case study in the central mid-hills of Nepal. Agr Ecosyst Environ 205:57–69CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Sharma NK (2010) District and VDC profile of Nepal. Intensive Study and Research Centre, KathmanduGoogle Scholar
  48. Sharma LN, Vetaas OR (2015) Does agroforestry conserve trees? A comparison of tree species diversity between farmland and forest in mid-hills of central Himalaya. Biodivers Conserv.  10.1007/s10531-015-0927-3
  49. Shrestha UB, Shrestha S, Chaudhary P, Chaudhary RP (2010) How representative is the protected areas system of Nepal? Mt Res Dev 30:282–294CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Smith J, Pearce B, Döring TF, Wolfe MS (2012) Developing modern multifunctional agroforestry systems for sustainable intensification. In: McCracken K (Ed.) SAC-SEPA Biennial conference: valuing ecosystems: policy, economic and management interactions. Edinburgh 3rd–4th April 257–262Google Scholar
  51. Sunwar S, Thornstrom C, Subedi A, Bystrom M (2006) Home gardens in western Nepal: opportunities and challenges for on-farm management of agrobiodiversity. Biodivers Conserv 15:4211–4238CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Swanson DJ, Creed AS (2014) Sharpening the Focus of force field analysis. J Change Manage 14(1):28–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Thomson EF, Bahhady FA (1995) A model-farm approach to research on crop-livestock integration—I. Conceptual framework and methods. Agric Sys 49:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Upreti BR, Upreti YG (2002) Factors leading to agro-biodiversity loss in developing countries: the case of Nepal. Biodivers Conserv 11:1607–1621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Warnes GR, Bolker B, Bonebakker L, Gentleman R, Liaw WHA, Lumley T, Maechler M, Magnusson A, Moeller S, Schwartz M, Venables B (2014) gplots: Various R programming tools for plotting data. R package version 2.15.0. http://CRAN.R-project.org/package=gplots. Accessed 12 Dec 2014
  56. Wiederkehr P, Gilbert R, Crist P, Caïd N (2004) Environmentally Sustainable Transport (EST): Concept, Goal, and Strategy-The OECD’s EST project. European J Transp Infrastruct Res 4(1):11–25Google Scholar
  57. Wieners E, Neuburger M, Schickhoff U (2015a) Adaptability of backcasting for sustainable development: a case study from Nepal. Int J Asian Bus Info Manage 6(3):16–27CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wieners E, Pradhan P, Neuburger M, Schickhoff U (2015b) Implementation of backcasting in a development project in Nepal: the role of the transition manager. Int J Environ, Cult, Econ Social Sustain: Annu Rev 11:35–46Google Scholar
  59. Young A (1997) Agroforestry for soil management. CAB International, Wallingford, United KingdomGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Crop ScienceUniversity of HohenheimHohenheimGermany
  2. 2.CEN Center for Earth System Research and Sustainability, Institute of GeographyUniversity of HamburgHamburgGermany

Personalised recommendations