A Conceptual Framework for IS Project Success

Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes of the Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering book series (LNICST, volume 193)

Abstract

The global IT development is becoming ever more dominant. Notwithstanding, most of the projects of IS are not satisfied – the IS projects are still experiencing failure. This research reviews the IS project success with the multi-dimensional and multi-level approaches. Various works in academic journals and conferences from 1992 to 2016 were elaborated. The findings indicate that empirical studies are crucial. Interestingly, a mutual relationship between three themes of works (project success, IS success, and acceptance and use of technology) has been identified. Consequently, a conceptual framework provides the comprehensive explanation for IS project success is shown, which could be a promising avenue of IS research.

Keywords

IS success IS project success Acceptance and use of technology 

References

  1. 1.
    Ajzen, I.: From intentions to actions: a theory of planned behavior. In: Kuhl, J., Beckmann, J. (eds.) Action Control, pp. 11–39. Springer, Heidelberg (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Atkinson, R.: Project management: cost, time and quality, two best guesses and a phenomenon, its time to accept other success criteria. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 17(6), 337–342 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Belassi, W., Tukel, O.: A new framework for determining critical success/failure factors in projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 3(14), 141–151 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Byrd, T., Thrasher, E., Lang, T., Davidson, N.: A process-oriented perspective of IS success: examining the impact of IS on operational cost. Omega 34(5), 448–460 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    CHAOS: The standish group report (2014). https://www.standishgroup.com
  6. 6.
    Chen, J., Chang, J., Kao, C., Huang, Y.: Integrating ISSM into TAM to enhance digital library services: a case study of the Taiwan digital meta-library. Electron. Lib. 34(1), 58–73 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chu, T.H., Chen, Y.Y.: With good we become good: understanding e-learning adoption by theory of planned behavior and group influences. Comput. Educ. 92, 37–52 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cleland, D., King, R.: System Analysis and Project. McGraw-Hill, New York (1983)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Compeau, D., Higgins, C.: Application of social cognitive theory to training for computer skills. Inf. Syst. Res. 6(2), 118–143 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Coombs, C.: When planned IS/IT project benefits are not realized: a study of inhibitors and facilitators to benefits realization. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 33(2), 363–379 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Cserhati, G., Szabo, L.: The relationship between success criteria and success factors in organisational event projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 32(4), 613–624 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Daniel, D.: Management information crisis. Harv. Bus. Rev. 39(5), 111–121 (1961)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Davies, T.: The ‘‘real’’ success factors on projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 20, 185–190 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Davis, K.: A method to measure success dimensions relating to individual stakeholder groups. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 34(3), 480–493 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Davis, W.S.: HIPO hierarchy plus input-process-output. In: Davis, W.S., Yen, D.C. (eds.) The Information System Consultant’s Handbook, Systems Analysis and Design, pp. 503–510. CRC, Boca Raton (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Davis, F.D.: Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Q. 13(3), 319–340 (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Davis, F.D., Bagozzi, R., Warshaw, P.: Extrinsic and intrinsic motivation to use computers in the workplace. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 22(14), 1111–1132 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    DeLone, W., McLean, E.: Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable. Inf. Syst. Res. 3(1), 60–95 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    DeLone, W., McLean, E.: Information systems success: a ten-year update. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 19(4), 9–30 (2003)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Delone, W., McLean, E.: Measuring e-commerce success: applying the DeLone & McLean information systems success model. Int. J. Electron. Commer. 9(1), 31–47 (2004)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    DeWit, A.: Measurement of project success. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 6(3), 164–170 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Espinosa, J., DeLone, W., Lee, G.: Global boundaries, task processes and IS project success: a field study. Inf. Technol. People 19(4), 345–370 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Fishbein, M., Ajzen, I.: Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley, Reading (1975)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Fortune, J., White, D.: Framing of project critical success factors by a systems model. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 24(1), 53–65 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gable, G., Sedera, D., Chan, T.: Enterprise systems success: a measurement model. In: ICIS Proceedings, Seattle (2003)Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Gable, G., Sedera, D., Chan, T.: Re-conceptualizing information system success: the IS-impact measurement model. J. AIS 9(7), 377–408 (2008)Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Hughes, D., Dwivedi, Y., Simintiras, A., Rana, N.: An analysis of the components of project success. In: Hughes, D., Dwivedi, Y., Simintiras, A., Rana, N. (eds.) Success and Failure of IS/IT Projects, pp. 27–43. Springer, London (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Hughes, D., Dwivedi, Y., Rana, N., Simintiras, A.: Information systems project failure – analysis of causal links using interpretive structural modeling. Prod. Plan. Control 27(16), 1313–1333 (2016)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Ika, L.: Project success as a topic in project management journals. Proj. Manag. J. 40(4), 6–19 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Ika, L., Diallo, A., Thuillier, D.: Critical success factors for world bank projects: an empirical investigation. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 30(1), 105–116 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Jetu, F., Riedl, R.: Determinants of information systems and information technology project team success: a literature review and a conceptual model. Commun. AIS 30(1), 455–482 (2012)Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Jones, A., Gallivan, M.: Toward a deeper understanding of system usage in organizations: a multilevel perspective. MIS Q. 31(4), 657–679 (2007)Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Lee, J., Park, J., Lee, S.: Raising team social capital with knowledge and communication in information systems development projects. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 33(4), 797–807 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lim, C., Mohamed, M.: Criteria of project success: an exploratory re-examination. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 17(4), 243–248 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Mason, R.: Measuring information output: a communication systems approach. Inf. Manag. 1(4), 219–234 (1978)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Metcalfe, M., Lynch, M.: Arguing for information systems project definition. In: Wynn, E.H., Whitley, E.A., Myers, M.D., DeGross, J.I. (eds.) Global and Organizational Discourse About Information Technology, pp. 295–321. Springer, New York (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Mitroff, I., Linstone, H.: The Unbounded Mind: Breaking the Chains of Traditional Business Thinking. Oxford University Press, Oxford (1995)Google Scholar
  38. 38.
    Morris, P., Hough, G.: The Anatomy of Major Projects: A Study of the Reality of Project Management. Wiley, Chichester (1987)Google Scholar
  39. 39.
    Muller, R., Jugdev, K.: Critical success factors in projects: Pinto, Slevin, and Prescott – the elucidation of project success. Int. J. Manag. Proj. Bus. 5(4), 757–775 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Nguyen, T.D.: A structural model for the success of information system projects. J. Sci. Technol. Dev. 18(2Q), 109–120 (2015)Google Scholar
  41. 41.
    Nguyen, T.D., Nguyen, D.T., Cao, T.H.: Acceptance and use of information system: e-learning based on cloud computing in Vietnam. In: Linawati, Mahendra, M.S., Neuhold, E.J., Tjoa, A.M., You, I. (eds.) ICT-EurAsia 2014. LNCS, vol. 8407, pp. 139–149. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-55032-4_14 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Nguyen, T.D., Nguyen, D.T., Nguyen, T.M.: Information systems success: the project management information system for ERP projects. In: Vinh, P., Alagar, V. (eds.) ICCASA 2015. LNCS (LNICST), vol. 165, pp. 198–211. Springer, Cham (2016). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-29236-6_20 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Nguyen, T.D., Nguyen, T.M., Cao, T.H.: Information systems success: a literature review. In: Dang, T.K., Wagner, R., Küng, J., Thoai, N., Takizawa, M., Neuhold, E. (eds.) FDSE 2015. LNCS, vol. 9446, pp. 242–256. Springer, Cham (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-26135-5_18 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Nguyen, T.D., Nguyen, T.M., Cao, T.H.: The relationship between IT adoption, IS success and project success. In: ICACCI Proceedings, pp. 1197–1203. IEEE (2016)Google Scholar
  45. 45.
    Petter, S., DeLone, W., McLean, E.: Measuring information systems success: models, dimensions, measures, and interrelationships. Eur. J. Inf. Syst. 17(3), 236–263 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Petter, S., DeLone, W., McLean, E.: The past, present, and future of “IS Success”. J. AIS 13(5), 341–362 (2012)Google Scholar
  47. 47.
    Petter, S., DeLone, W., McLean, E.: Information systems success: the quest for the independent variables. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 29(4), 7–62 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Pinto, J., Prescott, J.: Variations in critical success factors over the stages in the project life cycle. J. Manag. 14(1), 5–18 (1988)Google Scholar
  49. 49.
    Pinto, J., Prescott, J.: Planning and tactical factors in the project implementation process. J. Manag. Stud. 27(3), 305–327 (1990)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Pinto, J., Slevin, D.: Critical success factors in effective project implementation. In: Project Management Handbook, pp. 479–512. Wiley, Hoboken (1988)Google Scholar
  51. 51.
    Pinto, J., Slevin, D.: Critical success factors in R&D projects. Res. Technol. Manag. 32(1), 31–35 (1989)Google Scholar
  52. 52.
    Putra, S., Subiyakto, A., Ahlan, A., Kartiwi, M.: Coherent framework for understanding the success of an information system project. Telecommun. Comput. Electron. Control 14(1), 302–308 (2016)Google Scholar
  53. 53.
    Rai, A., Lang, S., Welker, R.: Assessing the validity of IS success models: an empirical test and theoretical analysis. Inf. Syst. Res. 13(1), 50–69 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Renzel, D., Klamma, R., Jarke, M.: IS success awareness in community-oriented design science research. In: Donnellan, B., Helfert, M., Kenneally, J., VanderMeer, D., Rothenberger, M., Winter, R. (eds.) DESRIST 2015. LNCS, vol. 9073, pp. 413–420. Springer, Cham (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-18714-3_33 Google Scholar
  55. 55.
    Rogers, E.: Diffusion of Innovations. Simon and Schuster, New York (1995)Google Scholar
  56. 56.
    Rockart, J.: Critical success factors. Harv. Bus. Rev. 57(2), 81–91 (1979)Google Scholar
  57. 57.
    Sambasivan, M., Wemyss, G., Rose, R.: User acceptance of a G2B system: a case of electronic procurement system in Malaysia. Internet Res. 20(2), 169–187 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Schultz, R., Slevin, D., Pinto, J.: Strategy and tactics in a process model of project implementation. Interfaces 17(3), 34–46 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Scopus: Journal Rankings – Subject Category: Management Information Systems. Scimago Lab (2016). http://www.scimagojr.com
  60. 60.
    Seddon, P.: A respecification and extension of the DeLone and McLean Model of IS success. Inf. Syst. Res. 8(3), 240–253 (1997)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    Seddon, P., Kiew, M.: A partial test and development of the DeLone and McLean model of IS success. ICIS Proc. 4(1), 99–110 (1994)Google Scholar
  62. 62.
    Seddon, P., Staples, S., Patnayakuni, R., Bowtell, M.: Dimensions of information systems success. Commun. AIS 2(3), 5 (1999)Google Scholar
  63. 63.
    Shannon, E., Weaver, W.: Recent contributions to the mathematical theory of communication. Math. Theory Commun. 1, 1–12 (1949)Google Scholar
  64. 64.
    Shenhar, A., Dvir, D.: Project management research - the challenge and opportunity. Proj. Manag. J. 38(2), 93–99 (2007)Google Scholar
  65. 65.
    Subiyakto, A., Ahlan, A.: A coherent framework for understanding critical success factors of ICT project environment. In: ICRIIS Proceedings (2013)Google Scholar
  66. 66.
    Subiyakto, A., Ahlan, A., Putra, S., Kartiwi, M.: Validation of information system project success model. SAGE Open 5(2), 1–14 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Subiyakto, A., Ahlan, A., Kartiwi, M., Sukmana, H.: Measurement of information system project success based on perceptions of the internal stakeholders. Int. J. Electr. Comput. Eng. 5(2), 271–279 (2015)Google Scholar
  68. 68.
    Sudhakar, G.: Model of critical success factors for software projects. J. Enterp. Inf. Manag. 25(6), 537–558 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Tate, M., Sedera, D., McLean, E., Jones, A.: Information systems success research: the twenty year update? Commun. AIS 34(64), 1235–1246 (2014)Google Scholar
  70. 70.
    Taylor, S., Todd, P.: Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models. Inf. Syst. Res. 6(2), 144–176 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Thompson, R., Higgins, C., Howell, J.: Personal computing: toward a conceptual model of utilization. MIS Q. 15(1), 125–143 (1991)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Thong, J.: An integrated model of information systems adoption in small businesses. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 15(4), 187–214 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Tukel, O., Rom, W.: Analysis of the characteristics of projects in diverse industries. J. Oper. Manag. 16(1), 43–61 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Turner, J.: The Handbook of Project-Based Management: Improving the Processes for Achieving Strategic Objectives. McGraw-Hill, New York (1993)Google Scholar
  75. 75.
    Urbach, N., Smolnik, S., Riempp, G.: The state of research on information systems success. Bus. Inf. Syst. Eng. 1(4), 315–325 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Urbach, N., Muller, B.: The updated DeLone and McLean model of information systems success. In: Dwivedi, Y.K., et al. (eds.) Information Systems Theory, vol. 28, pp. 1–18. Springer, New York (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. 77.
    Venkatesh, V.: Determinants of perceived ease of use: integrating perceived behavioral control, computer anxiety and enjoyment into the technology acceptance model. Inf. Syst. Res. 11(4), 342–365 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Venkatesh, V.: Technology acceptance model and the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. In: Wiley Encyclopedia of Management. Wiley (2015)Google Scholar
  79. 79.
    Venkatesh, V., Bala, H.: Technology acceptance model 3 and a research agenda on interventions. Dec. Sci. 39(2), 273–315 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D.: A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Manag. Sci. 46(2), 186–204 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    Venkatesh, V., Morris, M., Davis, G.B., Davis, F.D.: User acceptance of information technology: toward a unified view. MIS Q. 27(3), 425–478 (2003)Google Scholar
  82. 82.
    Venkatesh, V., Davis, F.D., Morris, M.: Dead or alive? The development, trajectory and future of technology adoption research. J. AIS 8(4), 267–286 (2007)Google Scholar
  83. 83.
    Venkatesh, V., Thong, J., Chan, F., Hu, P., Brown, S.: Extending the two-stage information systems continuance model: incorporating UTAUT predictors and the role of context. Inf. Syst. J. 21(6), 527–555 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Venkatesh, V., Thong, J., Xu, X.: Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. MIS Q. 36(1), 157–178 (2012)Google Scholar
  85. 85.
    Venkatesh, V., Thong, J., Xu, X.: Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology: a synthesis and the road ahead. J. AIS 17(5), 328–376 (2016)Google Scholar
  86. 86.
    Wang, M.H., Yang, T.Y.: Investigating the success of knowledge management: An empirical study of small-and medium-sized enterprises. Asia Pac. Manag. Rev. 21, 79–91 (2016)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Wateridge, J.: IT projects: a basis for success. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 13(3), 169–172 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Wateridge, J.: How can IS/IT projects be measured for success? Int. J. Proj. Manag. 16(1), 59–63 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Webster, J., Watson, R.: Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: writing a literature review. MIS Q. 26(2), 13–21 (2002)Google Scholar
  90. 90.
    Westerveld, E.: The project excellence model: linking success criteria and critical success factors. Int. J. Proj. Manag. 21(6), 411–418 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Wixom, B., Todd, P.: A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance. Inf. Syst. Res. 16(1), 85–102 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Thanh D. Nguyen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Tuan M. Nguyen
    • 2
  • Thi H. Cao
    • 3
  1. 1.Banking University of Ho Chi Minh CityHo Chi Minh CityVietnam
  2. 2.HCMC University of TechnologyHo Chi Minh CityVietnam
  3. 3.Saigon Technology UniversityHo Chi Minh CityVietnam

Personalised recommendations