Workplace Innovation Context in Poland: Between Structure and Agency

  • Marta Strumińska-Kutra
  • Boleslaw Rok
  • Zofia Mockałło
Chapter
First Online:
Part of the Aligning Perspectives on Health, Safety and Well-Being book series (AHSW)

Abstract

The cultural and institutional context in Poland can influence patterns supportive for workplace innovation. Highlighting technological innovation only and neglecting the workplace improvement in the case of Poland is associated with low work engagement. It is recognized that one of the central aspects of workplace innovation is the active involvement of employees in the innovation process. Hence, we investigate the following research questions: What is the role of employees in the process of designing and implementing workplace innovation and change in Poland? What is the impact of formal and informal organisational structures in this process? The chapter uses a qualitative approach based on in depth interviews and focus groups to answer those questions. We conclude that interaction between the individual (employee) and the structural level (organisation) may result in a gradual destruction of innovation, because innovation processes in Polish companies seem contrary to what workplace innovation WPI) stands for: WPI stresses an engaging role for employees to succeed in innovation, while Polish companies seem to do the opposite.

Keywords

Employees’ participation Workplace innovation Social trust Change Dependent economies Central and eastern Europe 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bendyk, E. (2015). Białe plamy na mapie, czyli o ukrytych potencjałach innowacyjności. In P. Zadura- Lichota (Ed.), Innowacyjna przedsiębiorczość w Polsce. Odryty i ukryty potencjał polskiej przedsiębiorczości (pp. 91–108). Warszawa: Polska Agencja Rozwoju Przedsiębiorczości.Google Scholar
  2. Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Czapiński, J., & Panek, T. (2015). Diagnoza społeczna 2015. Warunki i jakość życia Polaków. Warszawa: Rada Monitoringu Społecznego.Google Scholar
  4. Czarniawska, B. (2007). Shadowing and other techniques for doing fieldwork in modern societies. Malmo: Liber.Google Scholar
  5. Denzin, N. (1978). Sociological methods: A source book (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  6. Dunn, E. (2004). Privatizing poland. Baby food, big business, and the remaking of labor. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  7. European Commission. (2014). Flash Eurobarometer 398 working conditions report. Retrieved October 8, 2016, from http://ec.europa.eu/public_opinion/flash/fl_398_en.pdf
  8. Gadomska-Lila, K. (2011). Budowanie kultury innowacyjności w świetle badań empirycznych. Współczesne Zarządzanie, 1, 124–133.Google Scholar
  9. Hammersley, M., & Atkinson, P. (2007). Ethnography: Principals in practice (3rd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  10. Hatch, M. J., & Cunliffe, A. L. (2006). Organization theory: Modern, symbolic, and postmodern perspectives. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Hogan, S. J., & Coote, L. V. (2014). Organizational culture, innovation, and performance: A test of Schein’s model. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1609–1621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Högselius, P. (2003, January 16–18). Can East European Countries Innovate? Paper presented at the Danish Research Unit for Industrial Dynamics Winter Conference, Aalborg, Denmark. Retrieved October 16, 2016, from http://www.druid.dk/uploads/tx_picturedb/dw2003-708.pdf
  13. Howaldt, J., Oeij, P., Dhondt, S., & Fruytier, B. (2016). Workplace innovation and social innovation: An introduction. World Review of Entrepreneurship, Management and Sustainable Development, 12(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. King, L (2007). Central european capitalism in comparative perspective, w: B. Hancké, M. Rhodes, M. Thatcher (Eds.), Beyond varieties of capitalism: Conflict, contradictions, and complementarities in the european economy (pp. 307–327). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Kochanowicz, J., Mandes, M., & Marody, M. (2007). Kulturowe aspekty transformacji ekonomicznej. Warszawa: Instytut Spraw Publicznych.Google Scholar
  16. Kohtamäki, M., Kekäle, T., & Viitala, R. (2004). Trust and innovation: From spin-off idea to stock exchange. Creativity and Innovation Management, 13, 75–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kouvonen, A., Kivimaki, M., Vahtera, J., Oksanen, T., Elovainio, M., Cox, T., et al. (2006). Psychometric evaluation of a short measure of social capital at work. BMC Public Health, 6, 251.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  18. Makó, C., & Illéssy, M. (2015). Innovation policy review. National and European experiences. QuInnE Working Paper 1. Retrieved September 19, 2016 from http://bryder.nu/quinne1/sites/default/files/Working%20Paper%201%20revised%2020160425.pdf
  19. Marody, M., & Lewicki, M. (2010). Przemiany ideologii pracy. In M. Marody, & J. Kochanowicz (Eds.), Kultura i gospodarka (pp. 85–125). Warsaw: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.Google Scholar
  20. Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  21. Mockałło, Z. (2016). Innowacje w miejscu pracy i ich związek z jakością życia zawodowego—kapitałem społecznym, zaangażowaniem w pracę i samopoczuciem pracowników. In M. Strumińska-Kutra, & B. Rok (Eds.), Innowacje w miejscu pracy. Pomiędzy efektywnością a jakością życia zawodowego, Warsaw: Poltext.Google Scholar
  22. Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J., & Mulgan, G. (2010). The open book of social innovation. London: The Young Foundation and Nesta. Retrieved September. 19, 2016 from http://youngfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/The-Open-Book-of-Social-Innovationg.pdf
  23. Nieć, M. (2015). Działalność innowacyjna przedsiębiorstw w Polsce na tle krajów Europy. In P. Zadura-Lichota (Ed.), Innowacyjna przedsiębiorczość w Polsce. Odryty i ukryty potencjał polskiej przedsiębiorczości (pp. 11–46). Warszawa: Polska Agencja Rozwoju Przedsiębiorczości.Google Scholar
  24. Nölke, A., & Vliegenthart, A. (2009). Enlarging the varieties of capitalism: The emergence of dependent market economies in East Central Europe. World Politics, 61, 670–702.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. OECD (2014) Employment database—Employment indicators. Retrieved September, 19, 2016 from http://www.oecd.org/employment/emp/employmentdatabase-employment.htm
  26. Oeij, P. R. A., Dhondt, S., Kraan, K., Vergeer, R., & Pot, F. D. (2012). Workplace innovation and its relation with organisational performance and employee commitment. LLINE Lifelong Learning in Europe, 4. Retrieved September 19, 2016 from http://www.elmmagazine.eu/articles/workplace-innovation-and-its-relations-with-organisational-performance-and-employee-commitment/
  27. Oeij, P. R. A., Žiauberytė-Jakštienė, R., Dhondt, S., Corral, A., Totterdill, P., & Preenen, P. (2015). Workplace innovation in European companies., Eurofound Study Luxemburg: Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  28. Offe, C. (1998). Designing institutions in East European transitions. In R. E. Goodin (Ed.), The theory of institutional design (pp. 199–226). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  29. Patton, M. (1990). Qualitative evaluation and research methods. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  30. Sieradzka, K. (2014). Barriers to innovation activity of Polish small and medium-sized enterprises. Przedsiębiorstwo i region, 6, 88–96.Google Scholar
  31. Silverman, S (2013). Doing qualitative research, 4th Edition, London: Sage.Google Scholar
  32. Stocki, R., Prokopowicz, R., & Żmuda, G. (2008). Pełna partycypacja w zarządzaniu. Tajemnica sukcesu największych eksperymentów menedżerskich świata. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer.Google Scholar
  33. Totterdill, P., Pot, F. D., & Dhondt, S. (2016). Defining workplace innovation. In M. Strumińska-Kutra, & B. Rok (Eds.), Innowacje w miejscu pracy. Pomiędzy efektywnością a jakością życia zawodowego, forthcoming. Warsaw: Poltext.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marta Strumińska-Kutra
    • 1
    • 2
  • Boleslaw Rok
    • 2
  • Zofia Mockałło
    • 3
  1. 1.VID Specialized UniversityOsloNorway
  2. 2.Kozminski UniversityWarsawPoland
  3. 3.Ergonomics Department, Laboratory of Occupational Psychology and SociologyCentral Institute for Labour Protection—National Research InstituteWarsawPoland

Personalised recommendations