Advertisement

Automatic Removal of Mechanical Fixations from CT Imagery with Particle Swarm Optimisation

  • Mohammad Hashem Ryalat
  • Stephen Laycock
  • Mark FisherEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10208)

Abstract

Fixation devices are used in radiotherapy treatment of head and neck cancers to ensure successive treatment fractions are accurately targeted. Typical fixations usually take the form of a custom made mask that is clamped to the treatment couch and these are evident in many CT data sets as radiotherapy treatment is normally planned with the mask in place. But the fixations can make planning more difficult for certain tumor sites and are often unwanted by third parties wishing to reuse the data. Manually editing the CT images to remove the fixations is time consuming and error prone. This paper presents a fast and automatic approach that removes artifacts due to fixations in CT images without affecting pixel values representing tissue. The algorithm uses particle swarm optimisation to speed up the execution time and presents results from five CT data sets that show it achieves an average specificity of 92.01% and sensitivity of 99.39%.

Keywords

Immobilization mask CT images Head and neck cancer 

Notes

Acknowledgement

We would like to thank Prof. Susan Short and colleagues at St James’s University Hospital NHS Foundation Trust for their help and for providing some of the data used in this study.

References

  1. 1.
    Head and Neck Cancer - Overview. http://www.cancer.net/cancer-types/head-and-neck-cancer/overview. Accessed 27 Nov 2016
  2. 2.
    Head and Neck Cancers. https://www.cancer.gov/types/head-and-neck/head-neck-fact-sheet. Accessed 27 Nov 2016
  3. 3.
    The Office for National Statistics Report. https://www.ons.gov.uk/. Accessed 27 Nov 2016
  4. 4.
    Head and Neck Cancer: Statistics. http://www.cancer.net/cancer-types/head-and-neck-cancer/statistics. Accessed 27 Nov 2016
  5. 5.
    Ryalat, M.H., Emmens, D., Hulse, M., Bell, D., Al-Rahamneh, Z., Laycock, S., Fisher, M.: Evaluation of particle swarm optimisation for medical image segmentation. In: Świątek, J., Tomczak, J.M. (eds.) ICSS 2016. AISC, vol. 539, pp. 61–72. Springer, Heidelberg (2017). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-48944-5_6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Fisher, M., Applegate, C., Ryalat, M., Laycock, S., Hulse, M., Emmens, D., Bell, D., et al.: Evaluation of 3-D printed immobilisation shells for head and neck IMRT. Open J. Radiol. 4(04), 322 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Laycock, S.D., Hulse, M., Scrase, C.D., Tam, M.D., Isherwood, S., Mortimore, D.B., Emmens, D., Patman, J., Short, S.C., Bell, G.D.: Towards the production of radiotherapy treatment shells on 3D printers using data derived from dicom CT and MRI: preclinical feasibility studies. J. Radiother. Pract. 14(01), 92–98 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wei, K., He, B., Zhang, T., Shen, X.: A novel method for segmentation of CT head images. In: 2007 1st International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomedical Engineering, pp. 717–720. IEEE (2007)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Chen, W., Smith, R., Ji, S.-Y., Najarian, K.: Automated segmentation of lateral ventricles in brain CT images. In: IEEE International Conference on Bioinformatics and Biomeidcine Workshops, BIBMW 2008, pp. 48–55. IEEE (2008)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Qian, X., Wang, J., Guo, S., Li, Q.: An active contour model for medical image segmentation with application to brain CT image. Med. phys. 40(2), 021911 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Zaki, W.M.D.W., Fauzi, M.F.A., Besar, R., Ahmad, W.S.H.M.W.: Qualitative and quantitative comparisons of haemorrhage intracranial segmentation in CT brain images. In: 2011 IEEE Region 10 Conference, TENCON 2011, pp. 369–373. IEEE (2011)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eberhart, R.C., Kennedy, J., et al.: A new optimizer using particle swarm theory. In: Proceedings of the Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science, New York, NY, vol. 1, pp. 39–43 (1995)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Tillett, J., Rao, T., Sahin, F., Rao, R.: Darwinian particle swarm optimization. In: Prasad, B. (ed.) Proceedings of the 2nd Indian International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IICAI 2005), pp. 1474–1487 (2005)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Couceiro, M.S., Rocha, R.P., Fonseca Ferreira, N.M., Tenreiro Machado, J.A.: Introducing the fractional-order Darwinian PSO. Signal, Image and Video Processing 6(3), 343–350 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Otsu, N.: A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms. Automatica 11(285–296), 23–27 (1975)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Soille, P.: Morphological Image Analysis: Principles and Applications. Springer, Heidelberg (1999)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Gonzalez, R.C., Woods, R.E.: Image processing. Digit. Image Process. 2 (2007)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Clark, K., Vendt, B., Smith, K., Freymann, J., Kirby, J., Koppel, P., Moore, S., Phillips, S., Maffitt, D., Pringle, M., et al.: The cancer imaging archive (TCIA): maintaining and operating a public information repository. J. Digit. Imaging 26(6), 1045–1057 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    The Cancer Imaging Archive. http://doi.org/10.7937/K9/TCIA.2015.7AKGJUPZ/. Bosch, W.R., Straube, W.L., Matthews, J.W., Purdy, J.A.: Data From Head Neck Cetuximab (2015)

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mohammad Hashem Ryalat
    • 1
  • Stephen Laycock
    • 1
  • Mark Fisher
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.University of East AngliaNorwichUK

Personalised recommendations