Advertisement

Women on Board in Italy: The Pressure of Public Policies

  • Alessandra Rigolini
  • Morten Huse
Chapter

Abstract

In Italy, the so-called Golfo Mosca Law was implemented in 2012. Since its introduction, Italy has been among the countries making the most significant progress in terms of getting women on corporate boards. This law is characterised by a strong pressure through a sanction system, but it has a temporary validity. The aim of this chapter is to show the development of the gender balance initiatives and the effect of the quota law on boards in Italy. In order to understand the progress of the gender public policies in Italy, we also show the development of Italy’s political and economic environment, and we present the main characteristics of the corporate governance system.

References

  1. Aganin, A., & Volpin, P. (2005). The history of corporate ownership in Italy. In R. K. Morck (Ed.), A history of corporate governance around the world: Family business groups to professional managers. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Amatori, F. (1995). Il tormentato sviluppo della grande impresa industriale fra Stato e famiglie: il caso italiano in prospettiva storica. In G. Airoldi, F. Amatori, & G. Invernizzi (Eds.), Proprietà e governo delle imprese italiane (pp. 241–252). Milan: Egea.Google Scholar
  3. Amatori, F., & Colli, A. (2000). Corporate governance: The Italian story. INSEAD, at: http://www.insead.fr/cgep/Research/NationalSystems/CGItaly.pdf
  4. Assonime. (2016). Corporate governance in Italy: Compliance, remunerations and quality of the comply-or-explain. http://www.borsaitaliana.it/comitato-corporate-governance/documenti/altridocumenti/reportassonime2015b.pdf. Accessed 25 July 2016.
  5. Barca, F., & Trento, S. (1997). State ownership and the evolution of Italian corporate governance. Industrial and Corporate Change, 6(3), 533–559.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bianco, M., Ciavarella, A., & Signoretti, R. (2015). Women on corporate boards in Italy: The role of family connections. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 23(2), 129–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Borsa Italiana. (2016). http://www.borsaitaliana.it
  8. Brogi, M. (2013). Italy’s lessons learnt from Norway. In S. Machold, M. Huse, K. Hansen, & M. Brogi (Eds.), Getting women on to corporate boards: A snowball starting in Norway. Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  9. Brunetti, G. (1997). Il funzionamento del Consiglio di Amministrazione nella realtà italiana: problemi e prospettive sulla base di alcune evidenze empiriche. In Molteni (Ed.), I sistemi di corporate governance nelle grandi imprese italiane. Milano: EGEA.Google Scholar
  10. Confalonieri (1974–76). Antonio Confalonieri, Banca e industria in Italia 1894–1906, Banca Commerciale Italiana, Milano.Google Scholar
  11. Confalonieri. (1982). Antonio Confalonieri, Banca e industria in Italia dalla crisi del 1907 all’agosto 1914. Milano: Banca Commerciale Italiana.Google Scholar
  12. Consob. (2015). Annual report. Rome: Commissione Nazionale per le Società e la Borsa. Available at: www.consob.it/documenti/Pubblicazioni/Rapporto_cg/rcg2015.pdf
  13. D’Ascenzo, M. (2011). Fatti più in là. Donne al vertice delle aziende: le quote rosa nei cda. Gruppo 24 ore. Milano.Google Scholar
  14. D’Onza, G., Greco, G., & Ferramosca, S. (2014). Corporate governance in Italian listed companies. In Corporate governance. Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer.Google Scholar
  15. Gamba, M., & Goldstein, A. (2009). The gender dimension of business elites: Italian women directors since 1934. Journal of Modern Italian Studies, 14(2), 199–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gerschenkron, A. (1962). Economic backwardness in historical perspective: A book of essays (No. HC335 G386). Cambridge, MA: Belknap Press of Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Goldstein, A. (2003). Privatization in Italy 1993–2002: Goals, institutions, outcomes, and outstanding issues (CESifo working paper series no. 912). Munich: CESifo.Google Scholar
  18. Istat. (2015). www.istat.it
  19. Istat. (2017). www.istat.it
  20. Melis, A. (2000). Corporate governance in Italy. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 8(4), 347–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rigolini, A., Huse, M., & Göke, J., (2017, August 4–8). Who are the women being appointed to boards? The effects of tokenism and quotas. Paper submitted to Academy of Management 2017 Annual Meeting, in Atlanta.Google Scholar
  22. Romano, G., & Rigolini A. (2013). La strategia di governance. In Il governo strategico dell’azienda. Torino: Giappichelli.Google Scholar
  23. Rossi, N., & Toniolo, G. (1992). Catching up or falling behind? Italy’s economic growth, 1895–1947. The Economic History Review, 45(3), 537–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Spencer Stuart. (2016). Senior management in Italian family-owned businesses. https://www.spencerstuart.jp/~/media/pdf%20files/research%20and%20insight%20pdfs/senior-management-in-italian-family-owned-businesses_06jul207.pdf. Accessed 25 Jul 2016.
  25. Volpin, P. F. (2002). Governance with poor investor protection: Evidence from top executive turnover in Italy. Journal of Financial Economics, 64(1), 61–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. World Economic Forum. The global gender gap index 2010. Available at: http://www3.weforum.org/docs/WEF_GenderGap_Report_2010.pdf. Accessed 25 Jul 2016.
  27. Zattoni, A. (2006). Assetti proprietari e corporate governance. Milano: Egea.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Alessandra Rigolini
    • 1
  • Morten Huse
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Economics and ManagementUniversity of PisaPisaItaly
  2. 2.Department of Communication and Culture, BI Norwegian Business SchoolOsloNorway

Personalised recommendations