Advertisement

Setting the Scene: Women on Boards in Countries with Quota Regulations

  • Heike Mensi-Klarbach
  • Cathrine Seierstad
  • Patricia Gabaldon
Chapter

Abstract

The underrepresentation of women on corporate boards in Europe and across the world has received increased attention, especially over the last 15 years. Although there is an overall consensus that increasing the share of women in areas of power and influence is important for a number of reasons, the best manner in which to accelerate the process has been debated both between and within countries. Consequently, with an increased focus on women on boards and the use of substantially different strategies among countries, we argue that that there is a need for a better understanding of what is happening within the European setting in relation to women on boards and the use of strategies.

This chapter sets out to provide an introduction to Gender Diversity in the Boardroom: The Use of Different Quota Regulations. We provide a rationale for focusing on the eight European countries—Norway, Spain, Iceland, France, Italy, Belgium, the Netherlands and Germany—in this edited volume. All of these countries have introduced some sort of quota regulations in the period 2003–2015. Yet we also acknowledge that although quotas have been introduced in the eight countries, we see great variations in the design and regulations of the laws.

References

  1. Doldor, E., Sealy, R., & Vinnicombe, S. (2016). Accidental activists: Headhunters as marginal diversity actors in institutional change towards more women on boards. Human Resource Management Journal, 26(3), 285–303. http://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12107
  2. European Commission. (2016). Data about boards in the largest publicly listed companies in European countries. Retrieved from: http://ec.europa.eu/justice/gender-equality/gender-decision-making/database/business-finance/supervisory-board-board-directors/index_en.htm. Accessed 7 Mar 2017.
  3. Grosvold, J., & Brammer, S. (2011). National institutional systems as antecedents of female board representation: An empirical study. Corporate Governance, 19(2), 116–135. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2010.00830.x
  4. Iannotta, M., Gatti, M., & Huse, M. (2016). Institutional complementarities and gender diversity on boards: A configurational approach. Corporate Governance (Oxford), 24(4), 406–427. http://doi.org/10.1111/corg.12140
  5. Krook, M. L. (2007). Candidate gender quotas: A framework for analysis. European Journal of Political Research, 46(3), 367–394. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-6765.2007.00704.x
  6. Seierstad, C., Warner-Søderholm, G., Torchia, M., & Huse, M. (2017). Women on boards: Beyond the institutional setting—The role of stakeholders and actors. Journal of Business Ethics, 141(2), 289–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Terjesen, S., & Singh, V. (2008). Female presence on corporate boards: A multi-country study of environmental context. Journal of Business Ethics, 83(1), 55–63. http://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-007-9656-1
  8. Terjesen, S., Aguilera, R., & Lorenz, R. (2014). Legislating a woman’s seat on the board: Institutional factors driving gender quotas for boards of directors. Journal of Business Ethics, 128(2), 233–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Heike Mensi-Klarbach
    • 1
  • Cathrine Seierstad
    • 2
  • Patricia Gabaldon
    • 3
  1. 1.School of Economics and ManagementLeibniz Universität HannoverHannoverGermany
  2. 2.School of Business and ManagementQueen Mary University of LondonLondonUK
  3. 3.IE Business SchoolIE UniversityMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations