Compression-Aware In-Memory Query Processing: Vision, System Design and Beyond
Conference paper
First Online:
Abstract
In-memory database systems have to keep base data as well as intermediate results generated during query processing in main memory. In addition, the effort to access intermediate results is equivalent to the effort to access the base data. Therefore, the optimization of intermediate results is interesting and has a high impact on the performance of the query execution. For this domain, we propose the continuous use of lightweight compression methods for intermediate results and have the aim of developing a balanced query processing approach based on compressed intermediate results. To minimize the overall query execution time, it is important to find a balance between the reduced transfer times and the increased computational effort. This paper provides an overview and presents a system design for our vision. Our system design addresses the challenge of integrating a large and evolving corpus of lightweight data compression algorithms in an in-memory column store. In detail, we present our model-driven approach and describe ongoing research topics to realize our compression-aware query processing vision.
Keywords
Query Processing Intermediate Result Compression Algorithm Query Optimization Parameter Definition
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
References
- 1.Abadi, D., Boncz, P.A., Harizopoulos, S., Idreos, S., Madden, S.: The design and implementation of modern column-oriented database systems. Found. Trends Databases 5(3), 197–280 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 2.Abadi, D.J., Madden, S.R., Ferreira, M.C.: Integrating compression and execution in column-oriented database systems. In: SIGMOD, pp. 671–682 (2006)Google Scholar
- 3.Anh, V.N., Moffat, A.: Inverted index compression using word-aligned binary codes. Inf. Retr. 8(1), 151–166 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 4.Arroyuelo, D., González, S., Oyarzún, M., Sepulveda, V.: Document identifier reassignment and run-length-compressed inverted indexes for improved search performance. In: SIGIR, pp. 173–182 (2013)Google Scholar
- 5.Boncz, P.A., Kersten, M.L., Manegold, S.: Breaking the memory wall in MonetDB. Commun. ACM 51(12), 77–85 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Chen, Z., Gehrke, J., Korn, F.: Query optimization in compressed database systems. SIGMOD Rec. 30(2), 271–282 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 7.Copeland, G.P., Khoshafian, S.N.: A decomposition storage model. SIGMOD Rec. 14(4), 268–279 (1985)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 8.Damme, P., Habich, D., Lehner, W.: A benchmark framework for data compression techniques. In: Nambiar, R., Poess, M. (eds.) TPCTC 2015. LNCS, vol. 9508, pp. 77–93. Springer, Cham (2016). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-31409-9_6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 9.Damme, P., Habich, D., Lehner, W.: Direct transformation techniques for compressed data: general approach and application scenarios. In: Morzy, T., Valduriez, P., Bellatreche, L. (eds.) ADBIS 2015. LNCS, vol. 9282, pp. 151–165. Springer, Cham (2015). doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-23135-8_11 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Delbru, R., Campinas, S., Samp, K., Tummarello, G., Dangan, L., Delbru, R., Campinas, S., Samp, K., Tummarello, G.: Adaptive frame of reference for compressing inverted lists (2010)Google Scholar
- 11.Goldstein, J., Ramakrishnan, R., Shaft, U.: Compressing relations and indexes. In: ICDE, pp. 370–379 (1998)Google Scholar
- 12.Habich, D., Richly, S., Lehner, W.: GignoMDA - exploiting cross-layer optimization for complex database applications. In: VLDB (2006)Google Scholar
- 13.Iyer, B.R., Wilhite, D.: Data compression support in databases. In: VLDB Conference, pp. 695–704 (1994)Google Scholar
- 14.Kissinger, T., Schlegel, B., Habich, D., Lehner, W.: KISS-Tree: smart latch-free in-memory indexing on modern architectures. In: DaMoN, pp. 16–23 (2012)Google Scholar
- 15.Kissinger, T., Schlegel, B., Habich, D., Lehner, W.: QPPT: query processing on prefix trees. In: CIDR 2013 (2013)Google Scholar
- 16.Kleppe, A., Warmer, J., Bast, W.: MDA Explained. The Model Driven Architecture: Practice and Promise. Addison-Wesley, Massachusetts (2003)Google Scholar
- 17.Leis, V., Kemper, A., Neumann, T.: The adaptive radix tree: artful indexing for main-memory databases. In: ICDE, pp. 38–49 (2013)Google Scholar
- 18.Lemire, D., Boytsov, L.: Decoding billions of integers per second through vectorization. Softw. Pract. Exper. 45(1), 1–29 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 19.Neumann, T.: Efficiently compiling efficient query plans for modern hardware. PVLDB 4(9), 539–550 (2011)Google Scholar
- 20.Qiao, L., Raman, V., Reiss, F., Haas, P.J., Lohman, G.M.: Main-memory scan sharing for multi-core cpus. PVLDB 1, 610–621 (2008)Google Scholar
- 21.Roth, M.A., Van Horn, S.J.: Database compression. SIGMOD Rec. 22(3), 31–39 (1993)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 22.Schlegel, B., Gemulla, R., Lehner, W.: Fast integer compression using SIMD instructions. In: DaMoN (2010)Google Scholar
- 23.Silvestri, F., Venturini, R.: Vsencoding: efficient coding and fast decoding of integer lists via dynamic programming. In: CIKM, pp. 1219–1228 (2010)Google Scholar
- 24.Stepanov, A.A., Gangolli, A.R., Rose, D.E., Ernst, R.J., Oberoi, P.S.: SIMD-based decoding of posting lists. In: CIKM, pp. 317–326 (2011)Google Scholar
- 25.Willhalm, T., Popovici, N., Boshmaf, Y., Plattner, H., Zeier, A., Schaffner, J.: SIMD-scan: ultra fast in-memory table scan using on-chip vector processing units. PVLDB 2(1), 385–394 (2009)Google Scholar
- 26.Williams, R.: Adaptive Data Compression. Kluwer International Series in Engineering and Computer Science: Communications and Information Theory. Springer, US (1991)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
- 27.Zukowski, M., Heman, S., Nes, N., Boncz, P.: Super-scalar RAM-CPU cache compression. In: ICDE, p. 59 (2006)Google Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer International Publishing AG 2017