The Impacts of Demand Response on the Efficiency of Energy Markets in the Presence of Wind Farms

  • Neda Hajibandeh
  • Miadreza Shafie-khah
  • Saber Talari
  • João P. S. CatalãoEmail author
Conference paper
Part of the IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology book series (IFIPAICT, volume 499)


In this paper, an optimal scheduling of thermal and wind power plants is presented by using a stochastic programming approach to cover the uncertainties of the forecasted generation of wind farms. Uncertainties related to wind forecast error, consequently wind generation outage power and also system load demand are modeled through scenario generation. Then, with regard to day-ahead and real-time energy markets and taking into account the relevant constraints, the thermal unit commitment problem is solved considering wind energy injection into the system. Besides, in order to assess impacts of Demand Response (DR) on the problem, a load reduction demand response model has been applied in the base model. In this approach, self and cross elasticity is used for modeling the customers’ behavior modeling. The results indicate that the DR Programs (DRPs) improves the market efficiency especially in peak hours when the thermal Gencos become critical suppliers and the combination of DRPs and wind farm can be so efficient.


Demand response Electricity market Stochastic programming Wind production 



This work was supported by FEDER funds through COMPETE 2020 and by Portuguese funds through FCT, under Projects SAICT-PAC/0004/2015 - POCI-01-0145-FEDER-016434, POCI-01-0145-FEDER-006961, UID/EEA/50014/2013, UID/CEC/50021/2013, and UID/EMS/00151/2013. Also, the research leading to these results has received funding from the EU Seventh Framework Programme FP7/2007-2013 under grant agreement no. 309048.


  1. 1.
    Kennedy, J., Fox, B., Flynn, D.: Use of electricity price to match heat load with wind power generation. In: Proceedings of the IEEE Conference on Sustainable Power Generation and Supply (2009)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bathurst, G.N., Weatherrill, J., Strbac, G.: Trading wind generation in short-term energy markets. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 17, 782–789 (2002)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Matevosyan, J., Söder, L.: Minimization of imbalance cost trading wind power on the short-term power market. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 21, 1396–1404 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yu, W., et al.: Valuation of switchable tariff for wind energy. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 76, 382–388 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Pinson, P., Chevallier, C., Kariniotakis, G.: Trading wind generation from short-term probabilistic forecasts of wind power. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 22, 1148–1156 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Morales, J.M., Conejo, A.J., Perez-Ruiz, J.: Short-term trading for a wind power producer. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 25, 554–564 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Parsa Moghadm, M., Talebi, E., Mohamadian, M.: A new method for pricing of wind power in short-term power markets. In: Presented at 16th Power Systems Computation Conference (PSCC) (2008)Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Moeini-Aghtaie, M., Abbaspour, A., Fotuhi-Firuzabad, M.: Incorporating large-scale distant wind farms in probabilistic transmission expansion planning—part i: theory and algorithm. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 27, 1585–1593 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kianoosh, G., Boroojeni, M., Amini, H., Bahrami, H., Iyengar, S.S., Arif, I., Karabasoglu, O.: A novel multi-time-scale modeling for electric power demand forecasting: from short-term to medium-term horizon. Electr. Power Syst. Res. 142, 58–73 (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Yu, H., et al.: Probabilistic load flow evaluation with hybrid latin hypercube sampling and cholesky decomposition. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 24, 661–667 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Verbic, G., Schellenberg, A., Rosehart, W., Canizares, C.A.: Probabilistic optimal power flow applications to electricity markets. In: Probabilistic Methods Applied to Power Systems (PMAPS) (2006)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Boroojeni, K.G., Amini, M.H., Iyengar, S.S.: Overview of the Security and Privacy Issues in Smart Grids. Smart Grids. Security and Privacy Issues. Springer International Publishing, Heidelberg (2017)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Çiçek, N., Deliç, H.: Demand response management for smart grids with wind power. IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energ. 6, 625–634 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Heydarian-Forushani, E., Golshan, M.E.H., Moghaddam, M.P., Shafie-khah, M., Catalão, J.P.S.: Robust scheduling of variable wind generation by coordination of bulk energy storages and demand response. Energ. Convers. Manag. 106, 941–950 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Heydarian-Forushani, E., Golshan, M.E.H., Shafie-khah, M.: Flexible security-constrained scheduling of wind power enabling time of use pricing scheme. Energy. 90, 1887–1900 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Aalami, H.A., Moghaddam, M.P., Yousefi, G.R.: Demand response modeling considering interruptible/curtailable loads and capacity market programs. Appl. Energ. 87, 243–250 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Arasteh, H., et al.: Iot-based smart cities: a survey. In: IEEE 16th International Conference on Environment and Electrical Engineering (EEEIC) (2016)Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Shafie-khah, M., et al.: Strategic offering for a price-maker wind power producer in oligopoly markets considering demand response exchange. IEEE Trans. Industr. Inform. 11(6), 1542–1553 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Shafie-khah, M., Moghaddam, M.P., Sheikh-El-Eslami, M.K.: Unified solution of a non-convex SCUC problem using combination of modified branch-and-bound method with quadratic programming. Energ. Convers. Manag. 52(12), 3425–3432 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Fu, Y., Shahidehpour, M., Li, Z.: AC contingency dispatch based on security-constrained unit commitment. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 21, 897–908 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Zhao, C., Wang, J., Watson, J.P., Guan, Y.: Multi-stage robust unit commitment considering wind and demand response uncertainties. IEEE Trans. Power Syst. 28, 2708–2717 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© IFIP International Federation for Information Processing 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Neda Hajibandeh
    • 1
  • Miadreza Shafie-khah
    • 1
  • Saber Talari
    • 1
  • João P. S. Catalão
    • 1
    • 2
    • 3
    Email author
  1. 1.C-MASTUniversity of Beira InteriorCovilhãPortugal
  2. 2.INESC TEC and the Faculty of Engineering of the University of PortoPortoPortugal
  3. 3.INESC-ID, Instituto Superior TécnicoUniversity of LisbonLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations