Advertisement

The Impact of Unemployment on the Realization of Fertility Intentions

  • Ariane Pailhé
  • Arnaud Régnier-Loilier
Chapter
Part of the INED Population Studies book series (INPS, volume 7)

Abstract

The sharp rise in unemployment among the under-35s since the start of the crisis in 2008 has not brought down the total fertility rate, which stood at 1.98 children per woman in metropolitan France in 2014, only marginally below its 2008 level (2.01). But this stability does not mean that unemployment does not affect individual behaviours.

This chapters shows, first, that childless unemployed people less frequently plan to have a child in the short term. Second, beyond fertility intentions, person with experience of unemployment less frequently have a first child.

However, the birth of another child (generally the second) follows a very different rationale. Having a second child is frequent in France (the ideal family has at least two children) and the decision depends mainly (but not solely) on the desired spacing between births. All in all, unemployment does not directly affect women’s childbearing plans, nor those of men who are already fathers.

Keywords

Employment Status Union Formation Total Fertility Rate Fertility Decline Fertility Behaviour 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Adsera, A. (2005). Vanishing children: From high unemployment to low fertility in developed countries. American Economic Review, 95(2), 189–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adsera, A. (2011). The interplay of employment uncertainty and education in explaining second births in Europe. Demographic Research, 25(16), 513–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bajos, N., & Ferrand, M. (2006). L’interruption volontaire de grossesse et la recomposition de la norme procréative. Sociétés contemporaines, 61(1), 91–117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Becker, G. S. (1981). A treatise on the family. Cambridge/London: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Blossfeld, H. -P., Klijzing, E., Mills, M., & Kurz, K. (2005). Globalization, uncertainty and youth in society. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  6. Cox, D. R. (1972). Regression models and life tables. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series, B, 34(2), 187–220.Google Scholar
  7. Ekert-jaffe, O., & Solaz, A. (2001). Unemployment, marriage, and cohabitation in France. The Journal of Socio-Economics, 30(1), 75–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Friedman, D., Hechter, M., & Kanazawa, S. (1994). A theory of the value of children. Demography, 31(3), 375–401.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Kravdal, Ø. (2002). The impact of individual and aggregate unemployment on fertility in Norway. Demographic Research, 6(10), 263–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Kreyenfeld, M., Andersson, G., & Pailhé, A. (2012). Economic uncertainty and family dynamics in Europe: Introduction. Demographic Research: Special Collection 12, 27(28), 835–852.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Leridon, H. (2004). Can assisted reproduction technology compensate for the natural decline in fertility with age? A model assessment. Human Reproduction, 19(7), 1548–1553.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Lesthaeghe, R. (1995). The second demographic transition in western countries: An interpretation. In K. O. Oppenheim Mason, et A.-M. Jensen (Eds.), Gender and family change in industrialized countries (pp. 17–62). Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  13. Mazuy, M. (2009). Avoir un enfant: Être prêts ensemble ? Revue des sciences sociales, 41, 30–41.Google Scholar
  14. Meron, M., & Widmer, I. (2002). Unemployment leads women to postpone the birth of their first child. Population, English Edition, 57(2), 301–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Mills, M., Blossfeld, H.-P., & Klijzing, E. (2005). Becoming an adult in uncertain times. A 14 country comparison of the losers of globalization. In H.-P. Blossfeld, E. Klijzing, M. Mills, & K. Kurz (Eds.), Globalization, uncertainty and youth in society (pp. 423–441). Routledge Advances in Sociology Series: London/New York.Google Scholar
  16. Oppenheimer, V. K. (1994). Women’s rising employment and the future of the family in industrial societies. Population and Development Review, 20(2), 293–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Orain R. (2004). Entrées dans la carrière parentale et trajectoires d’emploi, Convention d’étude CEE-DARES, Rapport final.Google Scholar
  18. Pailhé, A. (2010). Effet attendu de la crise économique actuelle sur les naissances: Quelques hypotheses. Politiques sociales et familiales, 100, 97–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Pailhé, A., & Solaz, A. (2011). Does job insecurity cause missing births in a high fertility European country? Evidence for France, INED, Document de travail, 169.Google Scholar
  20. Pailhé, A., & Solaz, A. (2012). The influence of employment uncertainty on childbearing in France: A tempo or quantum effect? Demographic Research, 26(1), 1–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Pailhé, A., & Hamel, C. (2016). Avoir des enfants en contexte migratoire. In C. Beauchemin, C. Hamel, & P. Simon (Eds.), Trajectoires et origines, une enquête sur la diversité des populations en France (pp. 323–349). Paris: Éditions de l’Ined, “Grandes Enquêtes”.Google Scholar
  22. Pison, G. (2011). Two children per woman in France in 2010: Is French fertility immune to economic crisis? Population and Societies, 476.Google Scholar
  23. Prioux, F. (2003). Age at first union in France: A two-stage process of change. Population, English edition, 58(4–5), 559–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Régnier-Loilier, A. (2007). Avoir des enfants en France. Désirs et réalités (p. 159). Paris: Éditions de l’Ined, coll. “Les Cahiers”.Google Scholar
  25. Régnier-Loilier, A., & Guisse, N. (2016). Attrition et déformation de l’échantillon au fil des vagues de l’enquête Érfi. In Régnier-Loilier A. (Ed.), Parcours de familles (pp. 53–86). Paris: Éditions de l’Ined, “Grandes Enquêtes”.Google Scholar
  26. Régnier-Loilier A., & Prioux F. (2009). Comportements familiaux et pratique religieuse en France. In Régnier-Loilier, A. (Eds.), Portraits de familles. L’Étude des relations familiales et intergénérationnelles (pp. 397–423). Paris: Éditions de l’Ined, “Grandes Enquêtes”.Google Scholar
  27. Régnier-Loilier, A., & Solaz, A. (2010). La décision d’avoir un enfant: Une liberté sous contraintes. Politiques sociales et familiales, 100, 61–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Régnier-Loilier, A., & Vignoli, D. (2011). Fertility intentions in France and obstacles to their realization in France and Italy. Population, English Edition, 66(2), 361–390.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Sobotka, T., Skirbekk, V., & Philipov, D. (2011). Economic recession and fertility in the developed world. Population and Development Review, 37(2), 267–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Toulemon, L., & Leridon, H. (1999). La famille idéale: Combien d’enfants,à quel âge? Insee première, 652.Google Scholar
  31. Toulemon, L., & Testa, M. R. (2005). Fertility intentions and actual fertility: A complex relationship. Population and Societies, 415.Google Scholar
  32. WIC. (2012). European demographic data sheet 2012, Wittgenstein Centre for Demography and Global Human Capital, VID/ÖAW and IIASA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.French Institute for Demographic Studies (INED)Paris Cedex 20France

Personalised recommendations