Rotational Atherectomy in Coronary Arteries

  • Adam de BelderEmail author
  • Osama Alsanjari


Rotational atherectomy (RA) or rotablation is a highly specialized technique used to treat coronary atherosclerosis. A diamond/nickel-coated burr rotating at high speeds driven by compressed air allows vessel modification and ablates atherosclerotic plaque. The burr pulverizes calcific tissue to particulate matter, smaller than red blood cells, which are then processed by the reticulo-endothelial system. RA was developed to complement balloon-only angioplasty, which suffered significant restenosis rates. RA use was rationalized for debulking lesions, although not particularly selective regarding their complexity, but no clinical benefit was found using this approach. RA was rapidly recognized as an excellent tool for dealing with calcified plaques but, unfortunately, restenosis rates persisted with the use of bare-metal stents. The development of drug-eluting stents to tackle restenosis has contributed to the re-emergence and rising popularity of RA. When correctly used with modern techniques and appropriate training, RA offers a powerful tool in the arsenal against calcified disease, offering similar complication rates as conventional angioplasty. There has been an increase in demand for RA as the aging population is presenting with mature calcified coronary disease. RA offers a less invasive approach than coronary artery bypass graft surgery for treating these patients.



The authors would like to thank Dr. Victoria Parish for providing cardiac CT images of coronary calcification and Boston Scientific for their support.


  1. 1.
    Sage AP, Tintut Y, Demer LL. Regulatory mechanisms in vascular calcification. Nat Rev Cardiol. 2010;7:528–36.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Mahesh MV, Tarigopula M, Mintz GS, et al. Coronary artery calcification. Pathogenesis and prognostic implications. JACC. 2014;63(17):1703–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Mintz GS, Nissen SE, Anderson WD, et al. American College of Cardiology Clinical expert consensus document on standards for acquisition, measurement and reporting of intravascular ultrasound studies (IVUS). Am Coll Cardiol. 2001;37(5):1478–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Yabushita H, Bourma BE, Houser SL, et al. Characterisation of human atherosclerosis by optimal coherence tomography. Circulation. 2002;106:1640–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Agatston AS, Jonowitz WR, Hildner FJ, et al. Quantification of coronary artery calcium using ultrafast computed tomography. JACC. 1990;15:827–32.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Shaw LJ, Giambrone AE, Blaha MJ, et al. Long-term prognosis after coronary artery calcification testing in asymptomatic patients. Ann Intern Med. 2014;163(1):14–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Shaw LJ, Raggi P, Schisterman E, et al. Prognostic value of cardiac risk factors and coronary artery calcium screening for all-cause mortality. Radiology. 2003;228(3):826–33.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Valenti V, Hartaigh B, Heo R, et al. A 15-year warranty period for asymptomatic individuals without coronary artery calcium: a prospective follow-up of 9,715 individuals. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015;8(8):900–9.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Grüntzig A. Transluminal dilatation of coronary artery stenosis. Lancet (letter). 1978;i:263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Grüntzig A, Myler R, Hanna ES, Turina M. Coronary transluminal angioplasty. Circulation. 1977;48:55–6.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Kaltenbach M, Kober G, Satter P, Grüntzig A, Myler R, Sterzer S. Koronare Eingefäßerkrankung. Verh Dtsch Ges Herz Kreislforsch. 1980;46:130–7.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Beck A. Andreas Grüntzig; Eine Idee verändert die Medizin. Konstanz: Clio-Verlag; 1999. p. 2373.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Grüntzig A, Hirzel H, Goebel N, Gattinger R, Turina M, Myler R, Sterzer S, Kaltenbach M. Die perkutane transluminale Dilatation chronischer Koronarstenosen; erste Erfahrungen. Schweiz Med Wschr. 1978;108:1721–3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Grüntzig A, Senning A, Siegenthaler WE. Nonoperative dilation of coronary-artery stenoses. New Engl J Med. 1979;301:61–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Kensey KR, Nash JE, Abrahams L, Zarius CK. Recanalization of obstructed arteries with a flexible, rotating tip catheter. Radiology. 1987;165:387–9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Bittl JA, Chew DP, Topol EJ, et al. Meta-analysis of randomized trials of percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty versus atherectomy, cutting balloon atherectomy or laser angioplasty. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:936–42.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Reifart N, et al. Randomized comparison of angioplasty of complex coronary lesions at a single center – Excimer Laser, Rotational Atherectomy and Balloon Angioplasty Comparison (ERBAC) Study. Circulation. 1997;96:91–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Brown DL, et al. High speed rotational atherectomy of human coronary stenoses: acute and one-year outcomes from the New Approaches to Coronary Intervention (NACI) registry. Am J Cardiol. 1997;80(10A):60K–7K.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Barbato E, Carrie D, Dardas P, et al. European expert consensus on rotational atherectomy. EuroIntervention. 2015;11:30–5.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Cohen BM, Weber VJ, Blum RR, et al. Cocktail attenuation of rotational ablation flow effects (CARAFE) study: pilot. Catheter Cardiovasc Diagn. 1996;Suppl 3:69–72.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Dill T, Dietz U, Hamm C, et al. A randomized comparison of balloon angioplasty versus rotational atherectomy in complex coronary lesions (COBRA study). Eur Heart J. 2000;21:1759–66.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Whitlow PL, Bass TA, Kipperman RM, et al. Results of the study to determine rotablator and transluminal angioplasty strategy (STRATAS). Am J Cardiol. 2001;87:699–705.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Safian RD, Feldman T, Muller DW, et al. Coronary angioplasty and Rotablator atherectomy trial (CARAT): immediate and late results of a prospective multicentre randomized trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2001;53:213–20.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Vom Dahl J, Dietz U, Haager PK, et al. Rotational atherectomy does not reduce recurrent in-stent restenosis: results of the angioplasty versus rotational atherectomy for treatment of diffuse in-stent restenosis trial (ARTIST). Circulation. 2002;105:583–8.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Sharma SK, Kini A, Mehran R, et al. Randomized trial of rotational atherectomy versus balloon angioplasty for diffuse in-stent restonsis (ROSTER). Am Heart J. 2004;147:16–22.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lee CW, et al. Early and late clinical outcomes after rotational atherectomy with stenting versus rotational atherectomy with balloon angioplasty for complex coronary lesions. J Invasive Cardiol. 2004;16:406–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Moussa I, Di Mario C, Moses J. Coronary stenting after rotational atherectomy in calcified and complex lesions. Angiographic and clinical follow-up results. Circulation. 1997;96:128–36.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    De Waha S, Allali A, Buttner H-J, et al. Rotational atherectomy before paclitaxel-eluting stent implantation in complex calcified coronary lesions: two year clinical outcome of the randomized ROTAXUS trial. Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2016;87(4):691–700.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Silber S, Albertsson P, Aviles FF, et al. Guidelines for percutaneous coronary interventions: the Task Force for Percutaneous Coronary Interventions of the European Society of Cardiology. Eur Heart J. 2005;26(8):804–47.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Parikh K, Chandra P, Khanna P, Chambers J. Safety and feasibility of orbital atherectomy for the treatment of calcified coronary lesions:the ORBIT-I trial. Cardiovasc Catheter Interv. 2013;81(7):1134–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cockburn J, Hildick-Smith D, Cotton J, et al. Contemporary clinical outcomes of patients treated with or without rotational coronary atherectomy – an analysis of the UK central cardiac audit database. Int J Cardiol. 2014;170(3):381–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Brighton and Sussex University HospitalsBrightonUK

Personalised recommendations