Abstract

With advances in information and communication technologies (ICT), dramatic changes have been produced in physiotherapy provision. However, low adoption of the developed technologies calls attention for better theoretical model and methods for ICT design, which may fulfill the needs of physiotherapists and their patients. In this work we discuss the framework of designing ICT for physiotherapy based on some results obtained from the perspectives of physiotherapists and patients on electronic health records for physiotherapy. We underscore the importance of considering the context - the conditions in social and physical environment as well as end-users internal conditions to be in place - for a specific physiotherapy process.

Keywords

Context based design Online training Serious games 

References

  1. 1.
    Hood, L., Friend, S.H.: Predictive, personalized, preventive, participatory (p4) cancer medicine. Nat. Rev. Clin. Oncol. 8, 184–187 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Szasz, T., Hollender, M.: A contribution to the philosophy of medicine: the basic model of the doctor-patient relationship. Arch. Int. Med. 97, 585–592 (1956)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Emanuel, E.J., Emanuel, L.L.: Four model of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA 267, 2221–2226 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Clark, N.M., Nothwehr, F., Gong, M., et al.: Physician-patient partnership in managing chronic illness. Acad. Med. 70, 957–959 (1995)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Laine, C., Davidoff, F.: Patient-centered medicine. A professional evolution. JAMA 275, 152–156 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Quill, T.E., Brody, H.: Physician recommendations and patient autonomy: finding a balance between physician power and patient choice. Ann. Int. Med. 125, 763–769 (1996)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Coulter, A.: What do patients and the public want from primary care? BMJ 331, 1199–1201 (2005)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jull, G., Moore, A.: Physiotherapy’s identity. Manual Ther. 18, 447–448 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
  10. 10.
    e-Skills in Europe. Portugal Country Report. http://ec.europa.eu/DocsRoom/documents/4581
  11. 11.
    Cavaco, A., Santos, A.L.: Evaluation of health literacy and the readability of information leaflets. Revista Saude Publica 46, 918–922 (2012)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Santos, O., Lunet, N., do Carmo, O., Ferreira, P.: Prevalence of low health literacy. In: 27th Conference of the European Health Psychology Society, Bordeaux, vol. 28, no. sup. 1, pp. 1–335 (2013)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Ghanbari, H., Simila, J., Markkula, J.: Utilizing online serious games to facilitate distributed requirements elicitations. J. Syst. Softw. 109, 32–49 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Cialdini, R.: Harnessing the science of persuasion. Harv. Bus. Rev. 79, 72–79 (2001)Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Goldstein, N., Cialdini, R., Griskevicius, V.: A room with a viewpoint: using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. J. Cons. Res. 35, 472–482 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Van de Ven, N., Zeelenberg, M., Pieters, R.: The envy premium in product evaluation. J. Cons. Res. 37, 984–998 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Festinger, L.: A theory of social comparison processes. Hum. Relat. 7, 117–140 (1954)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Postolache, G., Oliveira, R., Moreira., I, Postolache, O.: Why, what and when in-home physiotherapy? In: Graffigna, G., (eds.) Transformative Healthcare Practice through Patient Engagement, pp. 215–246. IGI Global, Hershey (2016)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Mortazavi, B., Nyamathi, S., Lee, S.I., Wilkerson, T., Ghasemzadeh, H., Sarrafzadeh, M.: Near-realistic mobile exergames with wireless wearable sensors. IEEE J. Biomed. Health Inf. 18, 449–456 (2014)Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Srikesavan, C.S., Shay, B., Robinson, D.B., Szturm, T.: Task-oriented training with computer gaming in people with rheumatoid arthritisor osteoarthritis of the hand: study protocol of a randomized controlled pilot trial. Trials 14, 69 (2013)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Postolache, G., Moreira, I., Pedro, L., Oliveira, R.: Implementation of electronic health records in physical therapy. In: 1st Asia-Oceanian Congress for NeuroRehabilitation, Seoul (2015)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Lorenzi, N.M., Kourobali, A., Detmer, D.E., Bloomrosen, M.: How to successfully select and implement electronic health records in small ambulatory practice settings. BMC Med. Inf. Decis. Mak. 9, 15 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Vreeman, L.J., Taggard, S.L., Rhine, M.D., Worgell, T.W.: Evidence for electronic health record systems in physical therapy association. Phys. Ther. 86, 434–446 (2006)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Terry, A.L., Thorpe, C.F., Giles, G., Brown, J.B., Harris, S.B., Reid, G.J., Thind, A., Stewart, M.: Implementing electronic health records key factors in primary care. Can. Fam. Phys. 54, 730–736 (2008)Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Kaye, R., Kokia, E., Shalev, V., Idar, D., Chinitz, D.: Barriers and success factors in health information technology: a practitioner perspectives. J. Manag. Market. Healthc. 3, 163–175 (2010)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© ICST Institute for Computer Sciences, Social Informatics and Telecommunications Engineering 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Gabriela Postolache
    • 1
  • Raul Oliveira
    • 2
  • Octavian Postolache
    • 3
  1. 1.Instituto de Medicina Molecular, Instituto de TelecomunicacoesLisbonPortugal
  2. 2.Faculdade de Motricidade HumanaLisbonPortugal
  3. 3.Instituto de Telecomunicações, ISCTE-IULLisbonPortugal

Personalised recommendations