• Michael M. ReschEmail author
  • Andreas Kaminski
  • Petra Gehring
Conference paper


It is quite rare to witness a radical change in science—not just the advent of a new topic or a new idea, and not just a change in a single field or scientific discipline, but a transformation of the way in which science works in general. In this kind of situation, it is difficult to understand what is going on. Our perceptions are not yet accustomed the novelty; no scholarly language has been refined and developed to reflect on what’s going on.


Computer Simulation Language Game Single Field Epistemological Perspective Familiar Concept 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.


  1. Beisbart, Claus. 2012. How can computer simulations produce new knowledge? European Journal for Philosophy of Science 2 (3): 395–434.CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. Besson, Luc. 2014. Lucy. DVD. Universal City, CA: Universal Studios Home Entertainment.Google Scholar
  3. Brooker, Charlie, Barney Reisz, Annabel Jones, Otto Bathurst, Konnie Huq, Euros Lyn, Jesse Armstrong, et al. 2011–2016. Black mirror. TV Series.Google Scholar
  4. Fleck, Ludwik. 1981. Genesis and development of a scientific fact. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  5. Gramelsberger, Gabriele. 2008. Computerexperimente: Zum Wandel der Wissenschaft im Zeitalter des Computers. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
  6. Hubig, Christoph. 2006. Technikphilosophie als Reflexion der Medialität. Vol. 1 of Die Kunst des Möglichen. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
  7. Hubig, Christoph. 2007. Grundlinien einer dialektischen Philosophie der Technik. Vol. 2 of Die Kunst des Möglichen. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
  8. Hubig, Christoph. 2015. Macht der Technik. Vol 3 of Die Kunst des Möglichen. Bielefeld: Transcript.Google Scholar
  9. Humphreys, Paul. 2004. Extending ourselves: Computational science, empiricism, and scientific method. New York: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Humphreys, Paul. 2009. The philosophical novelty of computer simulation methods. Synthese 169 (3): 615–626.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Husserl, Edmund. 1939. Erfahrung und Urteil: Untersuchungen zur Genealogie der Logik. Ed. Ludwig Landgrebe. Prag: Academia.Google Scholar
  12. Kuhn, Thomas S. 1970. The structure of scientific revolutions. 2nd ed. International encyclopedia of unified science: Foundations of the unity of science. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  13. Küppers, Günter, and Johannes Lenhard. 2006. From Hierarchical to Network-Like Integration: A Revolution of Modeling Style in Computer-Simulation. In Simulation. Pragmatic Construction of Reality (Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook, 25), ed. Johannes Lenhard, Günter Küppers and Terry Shinn, 89–106. Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Lenhard, Johannes. 2015a. Kann Technik die Naturgesetze verändern? In Ding und System. Jahrbuch Technikphilosophie 2015, ed. Gerhard Gamm, Petra Gehring, Christoph Hubig, Andreas Kaminski and Alfred Nordmann, 171–186. Zürich, Berlin: Diaphanes.Google Scholar
  15. Lenhard, Johannes. 2015b. Mit allem rechnen - zur Philosophie der Computersimulation. Berlin, Boston: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Luhmann, Niklas. 1988. Familiarity, Confidence, Trust: Problems and Perspectives. In Trust. Making and breaking cooperative relations, ed. Diego Gambetta, 94–107. New York, NY, Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  17. Pfister, Wally. 2014. Transcendence. DVD. Burbank, CA: Warner Home Video.Google Scholar
  18. Pias, Claus. 2011. On the Epistemology of Computer Simulation. Zeitschrift für Medien- und Kulturforschung 2011 (1): 29–54.Google Scholar
  19. Winsberg, Eric B. 2010. Science in the age of computer simulation. Chicago, London: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Michael M. Resch
    • 1
    Email author
  • Andreas Kaminski
    • 1
  • Petra Gehring
    • 2
  1. 1.High Performance Computing Center Stuttgart (HLRS)University of StuttgartStuttgartGermany
  2. 2.Institute of Philosophy, TU DarmstadtDarmstadtGermany

Personalised recommendations