Assessing Augmented Creativity: Putting a Lovelace Machine for Interactive Title Generation Through a Human Creativity Test

  • Yasser S. Arenas Rebolledo
  • Peter van der Putten
  • Maarten H. Lamers
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10198)

Abstract

The aim of this study is to find to what extent computers can assist humans in the creative process of writing titles, using psychological tests for creativity that are typically used for humans only. To this end, a computer tool was designed that recommends new titles to users, based on knowledge generated from a pre-built corpus. This paper gives a description of both the development of the system as well as tests applied to the participants, derived from classical psychological tests for human creativity. A total of 89 participants divided in two groups completed two tasks which consisted of generating titles for paintings. One group was allowed to use a template-based system for generating titles, the other group did not use any tools. The results of the experiments show higher creativity scores for the combination of participants augmented by a computational creativity tool.

References

  1. 1.
    Bertin-Mahieux, T., Ellis, D.P., Whitman, B., Lamere, P.: The million song dataset. In: ISMIR 2011: Proceedings of the 12th International Society for Music Information Retrieval Conference (2011)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Bird, S.: NLTK: the natural language toolkit. In: Proceedings of the COLING/ACL on Interactive Presentation Sessions. Association for Computational Linguistics (2006)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Chen, C.: Boundless creativity: evidence for the domain generality of individual differences in creativity. J. Creative Behav. 40, 179–199 (2006)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Cope, D.: Experiments in music intelligence. In: Proceedings of the International Computer Music Conference. Computer Music Assn., San Francisco (1987)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Engelbart, D.: Augmenting Human Intellect: A Conceptual Framework. SRI Summary Report AFOSR-3223, October 1962Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eisenberger, R., Rhoades, L.: Incremental effects of reward on creativity. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 81, 728–741 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Guilford, J.P.: Creativity. Am. Psychol. 5(9), 444–454 (1950)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Guilford, J.P.: The Nature of Human Intelligence. McGraw-Hill, New York (1967)Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Lari, K., Young, S.J.: The estimation of stochastic context-free grammars using the inside-outside algorithm. In: Computer Speech and Language (1990)Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Licklider, J.C.R.: Man computer symbiosis. IRE Transactions on Human Factors in Electronics, HFE-1, 4–11 (1960)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Settles, B., 2010. Computational creativity tools for songwriters. In: Proceedings of the NAACL HLT 2010 Second Workshop on Computational Approaches to Linguistic Creativity. Association for Computational LinguisticsGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Torrance, E.P.: The Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking-Norms-Technical Manual Research Edition-Verbal Tests, Forms A and B-Figural Tests, Forms A and B. Personnel Press, Princeton (1966)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Thompson, D.: Hallo Spaceboy: The Rebirth of David Bowie. ECW Press, Toronto (2007)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Toole, B.: Poetical science. Byron J. 15, 55–65 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Van Deemter, K., Krahmer, E., Theune, M.: Real versus template-based natural language generation: a false opposition? In: Computational Linguistics (2005)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Wallach, M.A., Kogan, N.: Modes of thinking in young children: a study of the creativity- intelligence distinction Holt. Rinehart & Winston, New York (1965)Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Zhu, X., Xu, Z., Khot, T.: How creative is your writing? In: Proceedings of the Workshop on Computational Approaches to Linguistic Creativity (CALC) (2009)Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yasser S. Arenas Rebolledo
    • 1
  • Peter van der Putten
    • 1
  • Maarten H. Lamers
    • 1
  1. 1.Media TechnologyLeiden UniversityLeidenThe Netherlands

Personalised recommendations