Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Disturbing Skippy on Tour: Does It Really Matter? Ecological and Ethical Implications of Disturbing Wildlife

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Wildlife Tourism, Environmental Learning and Ethical Encounters

Part of the book series: Geoheritage, Geoparks and Geotourism ((GGAG))

Abstract

“What does it matter if a few Skippies are disturbed?” was the rhetorical retort of one tourism operator to the idea of minimal-impact wildlife-viewing. The most reasonable answer to this would probably be “maybe not at all or maybe quite a lot, depending on the situation”. Wildlife tourism, even with some unavoidable impacts, is often better than alternative land uses, but should be conducted responsibly, with a view to minimising impact on animal welfare and conservation as well as with consideration of other tour operations and local residents. This chapter explores some of the ethical considerations of disturbance of wildlife on tour, including driving animals away from feeding, breeding or resting areas, feeding of wildlife and stress related to close approach or other activity, in both wild and captive situations. Most of what we know so far involves the effects on individual animals. Further research is needed on how much the disturbances influence population numbers if we are to understand conservation implications, which can also be important for the satisfaction of human residents and visitors who want to continue watching wildlife. More research is also needed on animal welfare aspects such as activities that may cause serious levels of stress and how to determine same.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 199.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Anderson DW, Keith JO (1980) The human influence on seabird nesting success: conservation implications. Biol Conserv 18:65–80

    Google Scholar 

  • Bacon HJ (online content) Assessment of animal welfare in zoos. Retrieved from http://www.ed.ac.uk/files/imports/fileManager/Assessment%20of%20animal%20welfare%20in%20zoos%20(1).pdf. Nov 2016

  • Baird BA, Kuhar CW, Lukas KE, Amendolagine LA, Fuller GA, Nemet J, Willis MA, Schook MW (2016) Program animal welfare: using behavioral and physiological measures to assess the well-being of animals used for education programs in zoos. Appl Anim Behav Sci 176:150–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballantyne‪ R, Moscardo G, Hughes K (2007) ‪Designing interpretive signs: principles in practice. Fulcrum Publishing, Golden, CO, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayazit V (2009) Evaluation of cortisol and stress in captive animals. Aust J Basic Appl Sci 53(3):1022–1031

    Google Scholar 

  • Beckmann C, Shine R (2012) Do drivers intentionally target wildlife on roads? Austral Ecol 37(5):629–632

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bejder L, Samuels A, Whitehead H, Gales N, Connor MJ, Heithaus R, Watson-Capps J, Laherty C, Krutze M (2006) Decline in relative abundance of bottlenose dolphins exposed to long-term disturbance. Conserv Biol 20(6):1791–1798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benesch AR (2007) Chronoethological assessment of well-being and husbandry in captive koalas, Phascolarctos cinereus, Goldfuss 1817. Ph.D. thesis. Goethe Universitätist, Frankfurt. Available online at http://publikationen.ub.uni-frankfurt.de/frontdoor/index/index/year/2007/docId/902

  • Burns GL (this volume) Ethics and responsibility in wildlife tourism: lessons from compassionate conservation in the anthropocene. In: de Lima IB, Green RJ (eds)

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns GL, Moore S, Macbeth J (2011) Should dingoes die? Principles for engaging ecocentric ethics in wildlife tourism management. J Ecotour 10(3):179–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CALM (Department of Conservation and Land Management, Western Australia) (2000) Recreation, tourism and visitor services: draft policy guidelines. Department of Conservation and Land Management, Bentley, Western Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Carder G, Semple S (2008) Visitor effects on anxiety in two captive groups of western lowland gorillas. Appl Anim Behav Sci 115(3):211–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Calver M (2005) Researching ecological impacts. In: Newsome D, Dowling RK, Moore SA (eds) Aspects of tourism: wildlife tourism. Channel View Publications, Clevedon

    Google Scholar 

  • Davey G (2007) Visitors’ effects on the welfare of animals in the zoo: a review. J Appl Anim Welfare Sci 10(2):169–183

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins MS (2008) The science of animal suffering. Ethology 114(10):937–945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Waal F (2016) Are we smart enough to know how smart animals are?. W.W. Norton & Co., New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of the Environment and Heritage (2005) Australian national guidelines for Whale and Dolphin watching. Retrieved from https://www.environment.gov.au/system/files/resources/fed9ff86-0571-43ff-bb18-32205fc6a62c/files/whale-watching-guidelines-2005.pdf. Nov 2016

  • Draper C, Harris S (2012) The assessment of animal welfare in British zoos by government-appointed inspectors. Animals 2(4):507–528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ecocean (2016) Best practice whale shark ecotourism manual. Retrieved from http://www.whaleshark.org/ECOCEAN%20Best%20Practice%20Whale%20Shark%20Ecotourism%20UNEP%20MANUAL.pdf. Oct 2016

  • Fennell D (2015) The status of animal ethics research in tourism: a review of theory. In: Markwell K (ed) Animals and tourism: understanding diverse relationships. Channel View Publications, Clevedon, pp 27–43

    Google Scholar 

  • Fernandez EJ, Tamborski MA, Pickens SR, Timberlake W (2009) Animal–visitor interactions in the modern zoo: conflicts and interventions. Appl Anim Behav Sci 120(1–2):1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzgibbon SI, Jones DN (2006) A community-based wildlife survey: the knowledge and attitudes of residents of suburban Brisbane, with a focus on bandicoots. Wildlife Res 33(3):233–241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox A (1982) Conservation vs. recreation: national parks at the crossroads. Australian Science Magazine (Apr/May/June 1982), pp 16–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Frost W (ed) (2011) Zoos and tourism: conservation, education, entertainment?. Channel View Publications, Clevedon

    Google Scholar 

  • Garlick S, Austen R (2014) Post-traumatic stress disorder in kangaroos. Paper presented at australian wildlife rehabilitation conference, Hobart, Tasmania, May 2014

    Google Scholar 

  • Giese M (1996) Effects of human activity on Adelie penguin Pygoscelis adeliae breeding success. Biol Conserv 75(2):157–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Giese M (2000) Giving penguins their space: visiting breeding Adelie penguins without causing disturbance [Video presentation]. Department of environment, Commonwealth of Australia and the Australian Antarctic Division, Tasmania

    Google Scholar 

  • Gordon J (2014) Tourist influx threatens kangaroos, poll, photos. Newcastle Herald. Retrieved from http://www.theherald.com.au/story/2016694/tourist-influx-threatens-kangaroos-poll-photos/ Aug 2016

  • Green RJ (2013) Wildlife tourism: a handbook for guides, tour operators, job-seekers and business start-ups [Kindle Edition], Unknown Publisher Amazon.com

  • Green RJ, Higginbottom K (2001) The negative effects of wildlife tourism on wildlife. Wildlife tourism research report no. 5. CRC for Sustainable Tourism. Gold Coast, Queensland

    Google Scholar 

  • Ham SH, Weiler B (2002) Interpretation as the centrepiece of sustainable wildlife tourism. In: Harris R, Griffin T, Williams P (eds) Sustainable tourism: a global perspective. Butterworth Heinemann, Oxford, pp 35–44

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hanes AC (2012) Seven years later: can we maintain the 7-metre gorilla tracking distance? Gorilla J 44:9–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Hansard (1995) Exhibited animals protection act: disallowance of regulation. Egislatve Council, Parliament of New South Wales. 21 Nov 1995

    Google Scholar 

  • Harris R, Leiper N (1995) Sustainable tourism: an Australian perspective. Butterworth-Heinemann, Chatswood, New South Wales

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbottom K (ed) (2004) Wildlife tourism: impacts, management and planning. Common Ground Publishing, CRC for Sustainable Tourism, Gold Coast

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbottom K, Green RJ, Leiper N, Moscardo G, Tribe A, Buckley R (2003a) Evaluation of organised tourism involving wild kangaroos. Wildlife tourism research report no. 18. CRC for Sustainable Tourism. Gold Coast, Queensland

    Google Scholar 

  • Higginbottom K, Green RJ, Northrope CL (2003b) A framework for managing the negative impacts of wildlife tourism on wildlife. Hum Dimens Wildlife 8(1):1–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higginbottom K, Northrope CL, Green RJ (2001) Positive effects of wildlife tourism on wildlife. Wildlife Tourism research report no. 6. CRC for Sustainable Tourism. Gold Coast, Queensland

    Google Scholar 

  • Higham JES (1998) Tourists and albatrosses: the dynamics of tourism at the Northern Royal Albatross colony, Taiaroa Head, New Zealand. Tourism Manag 19(6):521–531

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hough IJ (2006) Jaw disease in macropods. Marsupial Society. Retrieved from http://www.marsupialsociety.org/jaw_disease2.html. Aug 2016

  • Hughes K, Ballantyne R (2013) Winning hearts and minds through interpreting ecotoursim experiences: walking the talk. In: Ballantyne R, Packer J (eds) International handbook on ecotourism. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, UK, pp 322–335

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Iivari P (this volume) Land-use conflict and perspectives for its resolution—wildlife watching meets reindeer herding in the European North, In: de Lima IB, Green RJ (eds)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones DN (2011) An appetite for connection: why we need to understand the effect and value of feeding wild birds. Emu 111:i–vii

    Google Scholar 

  • Kaplan G (2015) Bird minds: cognition and behaviour of Australian native birds. CSIRO Publishing, Clayton North, Victoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Kauffman L (2010) Primate response to tourist presence at Raleighvallen, Central Suriname Nature Reserve. Doctoral thesis. University of Florida

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindenmeyer D, Gibbons P (eds) (2012) Biodiversity monitoring in Australia. CSIRO Publishing, Clayton North, Victoria

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcoll and Tribe (this volume) Wildlife tourism and conservation: the hidden Vale Project. In: de Lima IB, Green JR (eds)

    Google Scholar 

  • Moscardo G, Woods B, Saltzer R (2004) The role of interpretation in wildlife tourism. In: Higginbottom K (ed) Wildlife tourism: impacts, management and planning. Common Ground Publishing, Altona, VIC, Australia, pp 231–251

    Google Scholar 

  • Newsome D, Moore SA, Dowling RK (2002) Natural area tourism: ecology, impacts and management. Channel View Publications, Clevedon

    Google Scholar 

  • Newsome D, Dowling RK, Moore SA (2005) Aspects of tourism: wildlife tourism. Channel View Publications, Clevedon

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberbillig DR (2000) Providing positive wildlife viewing experiences, a practical handbook. Colorado Division of Wildlife and Watchable Wildlife, Inc

    Google Scholar 

  • OMICS International (2014) Dingo attack. Open access article. Available at http://research.omicsgroup.org/index.php/Dingo_attack. Oct 2016

  • Pople A, Grigg G (1999) Commercial harvesting of Kangaroos in Australia. Department of Zoology, The University of Queensland, for Environment Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiser (this volume) Will the ark sink? Captive wildlife, tourism and the human relationship to nature: demystifying zoos. In: de Lima IB, Green JR (eds)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhodes JR, Beyer HL, Preece HJ, McAlpine CA (2015) South East Queensland Koala population modelling study. UniQuest, Brisbane, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Right Tourism (2012) Photo taking with animals. Available at http://right-tourism.com/issues/animals-attractions/photo-prop-animals/#sthash.WnkazUcb.dpbs. Nov 2016

  • Roberts B, Eby P, Catterall C, Kanowski JJ, Bennett G (2011) The outcomes and costs of relocating flying-fox camps: insights from the case of Maclean, Australia. In: Law B, Eby P, Lunney D, Lumsden L (eds) The biology and conservation of Australasian bats. Royal Zoological Society of NSW, Mosman, pp 277–287

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Rodger K, Calver M (2005) Natural science and wildlife tourism. In: Newsome D, Dowling RK, Moore SA (eds) Aspects of tourism: wildlife tourism. Channel View Publications, Clevedon, pp 217–234

    Google Scholar 

  • Roe D, Leader-Williams N, Dalal-Clayton B (1997) Take only photographs, leave only footprints: the environmental impacts of wildlife tourism. In: IIED wildlife and development series, vol 10. International Institute for Environment and Development, London, UK

    Google Scholar 

  • Rose K (2005) Common diseases of Urban wildlife: common diseases—Myopathy and Trauma June. Australian Registry of Wildlife Health

    Google Scholar 

  • Sade C (2013) Visitor effects on zoo animals. Plymouth Stud Sci 6(1):423–433

    Google Scholar 

  • Schlenker LS, Latour RJ, Brill RW, Graves JE (2016) Physiological stress and post-release mortality of white marlin (Kajikia albida) caught in the United States recreational fishery. Conserv Physiol 4(1):1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherwen SL, Harvey TJ, Magrath MJ, Butler KL, Fanson KV, Hemsworth PH (2015a) Effects of visual contact with zoo visitors on Black-capped Capuchin welfare. Appl Anim Behav Sci 167(June 2015):65–73 doi:10.1016/j.applanim.2015.03.004

  • Sherwen S, Trista JH, Magrath MJL, Butler KL, Fanson KE, Hemsworth PH (2015b) Effects of visual contact with zoo visitors on black-capped capuchin welfare. Appl Anim Behav Sci 167:65–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sherwen SL, Hemsworth PH, Butler KL, Fanson KV, Magrath MJL (2015c) Impacts of visitor number on kangaroos housed in free-range exhibits. Zoo Biol 34(4):287–295. doi:10.1002/zoo.21226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor AR, Knight RL (2003) Wildlife responses to recreation and associated visitor perceptions. Ecol Appl 13(4):951–963

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tribe A (2008) Zoos and animal welfare. In: Proceedings of: AAWS 2008: the welfare of animals—it’s everyone’s business. AAWS the Australian Approach. AAWS 08: international animal welfare conference. Gold Coast, QLD, Australia, 31 Aug–3 Sept 2008, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward-Paige CA (2016) Even scientists take selfies with wild animals. Here’s why they shouldn’t. The Conversation. 28 June. Retrieved from https://theconversation.com/even-scientists-take-selfies-with-wild-animals-heres-why-they-shouldnt-61252. Nov 2016

  • Weiler B, Black R (2014) Tour guiding research insights, issues and implications. Channel View Publications, Clevedon

    Google Scholar 

  • Wildlife Tourism Australia Inc. (2016a) Policy: tourist wildlife interactions http://www.wildlifetourism.org.au/conservation/policies/policies/tourist-wildlife-interactions/

  • Wildlife Tourism Austrlia Inc. (2016b) Australia wildlife viewing guidelines http://www.wildlifetourism.org.au/conservation/policies/best-practices/australian-wildlife-viewing-guidelines/

  • Wildlife Tourism Austrlia Inc. (2016c) Wildlife research network (http://www.wildlifetourism.org.au/resources/research-by-tour-operators-etc/research-by-tour-operators-etc-background-information/)

  • Wilson R (1999) Possums in the spotlight. Nat Aust 26(4):35–41

    Google Scholar 

  • Wolf ID, Croft DB (2010) Minimizing disturbance to wildlife by tourists approaching on foot or in a car: a study of kangaroos in the Australian rangelands. Appl Anim Behav Sci 126(1):75–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf ID, Croft DB (2012) Observation techniques that minimize impacts on wildlife and maximize visitor satisfaction in night-time tours. Tourism Manag Perspect 4(2012):164–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Griffith University, Brisbane, Australia

    Ronda J. Green

  2. Wildlife Tourism Australia Inc., Rathdowney, Australia

    Ronda J. Green

Authors
  1. Ronda J. Green
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ronda J. Green .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. School of Business and Tourism, Southern Cross University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia

    Ismar Borges de Lima

  2. Wildlife Tourism Australia (WTA) , Rathdowney, Queensland, Australia

    Ronda J. Green

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Green, R.J. (2017). Disturbing Skippy on Tour: Does It Really Matter? Ecological and Ethical Implications of Disturbing Wildlife. In: Borges de Lima, I., Green, R. (eds) Wildlife Tourism, Environmental Learning and Ethical Encounters. Geoheritage, Geoparks and Geotourism. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55574-4_14

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation