Growing Recognition of Bohm’s Causal Interpretation

Chapter
First Online:

Abstract

In terms of Bohm’s contribution to physics—at least in the narrow sense of his original 1952 papers and of the extension of that work to include spin and special relativity—the last 60 years have seen a slow but significant change.

Keywords

Quantum Mechanic Geometric Algebra Quantum Potential Bohmian Mechanic Monte Carlo Quantum 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Bacciagaluppi, G., & Valentini, A. (2009). Quantum theory at the cross-roads: Reconsidering the 1927 Solvay conference. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Baggott, J. (1992). The meaning of quantum theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Beller, M. (1999). Quantum dialogue. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  4. Bohm, D., & Hiley, B. (1993). The undivided universe: An ontological intepretation of quantum theory. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
  5. Clegg, B. (2014). The quantum age: How the physics of the very small has transformed our lives. London: Icon Books.Google Scholar
  6. Cushing, J. T. (1994). Quantum mechanics: Historical contingency and the Copenhagen hegemony. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  7. Düerr, D. (2012). The wrong, the good and the better (book review of bohm and peat, science, order and creativity). http://www.mathematik.uni-muenchen.de/~duerr/BohmPeat.pdf.
  8. Everyhope-Roser, J. (2013). Glimpse magazine. Clemson university: Quantum heretic. http://glimpse.clemson.edu/quantum-heretic/.
  9. Fletcher, J. (2014). Clifford algebra. http://wiki.c2.com/?CliffordAlgebra.
  10. Frescura, F. A. M., & Hiley, B. J. (1984). Algebra, quantum theory and pre-space, volume especial, os 70 anos de mario schonberg. Revista Brasileira de Fisica, 6, 49–86. See also http://www.bbk.ac.uk/tpru/BasilHiley/P12FrescandHiley3.pdf.
  11. Ghirardi, G. (2005). Sneaking a look at god’s cards, unravelling the mysteries of quantum mechanics (Revised ed.). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Hiley, B. (2001). Recent publications. http://www.bbk.ac.uk/tpru/RecentPublications.html.
  13. Hiley, B. J. (2010). Some remarks on the evolution of bohms proposals for an alternative to standard quantum mechanics. http://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/8a28/9b354f22f6b7af05b4d6cb3f4faf1b00d22d.pdf.
  14. Maudlin, T. (2011). Quantum non-locality and relativity (3rd ed.). Chichester: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  15. Oriols, X., & Mompart, J. (2012). Applied Bohmian mechanics. Singapore: Pan Stanford (The first chapter is available at http://arxiv.org/abs/1206.1084).
  16. Sanz, A. S., & Miret-Artés, S. (2012). A trajectory description of quantum processes I. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Sanz, A. S., & Miret-Artés, S. (2014). A trajectory description of quantum processes II. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  18. Towler, M. (2009). Pilot wave theory. http://www.tcm.phy.cam.ac.uk/~mdt26/pilot_waves.html.
  19. Wolchover, N. (2014). Quanta magazine: Fluid tests hint at concrete quantum reality. https://www.quantamagazine.org/20140624-fluid-tests-hint-at-concrete-quantum-reality/.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.OxfordUK

Personalised recommendations