Advertisement

What Is More Important to Residents: A City’s Attractiveness or Citizens’ Residential Satisfaction? An Analysis of the Explanatory Attributes in Shrinking Cities of Portugal

  • Ana Paula Barreira
  • Maria Helena Guimarães
  • Thomas Panagopoulos
Chapter
Part of the Community Quality-of-Life and Well-Being book series (CQLWB)

Abstract

Research into shrinking cities (population decline) has captured the attention of scholars as the phenomenon spreads in Europe. Empirical studies have shown that residents in shrinking cities experience satisfaction from living in cities with declining populations. This paper examines how inhabitants in shrinking cities assess their level of residential satisfaction and the features that make their city attractive, using a face-to-face questionnaire survey (N = 701) conducted in four Portuguese cities that have been experiencing population decline over the last two decades (1991–2011). The results show that individuals’ levels of residential satisfaction are high in shrinking cities. Inhabitants’ expressed level of residential satisfaction does not mean that they are not confronted with residential issues that may impel them to move out of the cities. As such, assessing residential satisfaction may be different from measuring the attractive and unattractive features of a city as a place to live. The attributes of the cities that gave higher levels of residential satisfaction varied substantially between cities, but the most important attributes for making cities attractive places in which to live varied only slightly. When respondents were asked about the existing attributes that may impel individuals to move out, economic attributes emerged as the most important, but in only a few cases were those attributes related to residential dissatisfaction. Accordingly, no single answer can be provided to the question of whether a city’s attractiveness or citizens’ residential satisfaction matters more. Either the former or the latter may be considered more important depending on whether shrinkage reversion or shrinkage acceptance, respectively, is the strategy adopted by a particular city.

Keywords

Residential satisfaction City attractiveness Residents’ attachment Shrinking cities Correlation analysis Portugal 

References

  1. Aiello, A., Ardone, R. G., & Scopelliti, M. (2010). Neighborhood planning improvement: Physical attributes, cognitive and affective evaluation and activities in two neighborhoods in Rome. Evaluation and Program Planning, 33(3), 264–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alesina, A., & La Ferrara, E. (2002). Who trusts others? Journal of Public Economics, 85(2), 207–234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Amérigo, M. (2002). ‘A psychological approach to the study of residential satisfaction’. In J. I. Aragonés, G. Francescato & T. Gärling (Eds.), Residential environments: Choice, satisfaction and behaviour (pp. 81–100). Westport: Bergin and Garvey.Google Scholar
  4. Amérigo, M., & Aragonés, J. I. (1997). A theoretical and methodological approach to the study of residential satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 17(1), 47–57.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Andersen, H. S. (2002). Excluded places: The interaction between segregation, urban decay and deprived neighborhoods. Housing, Theory and Society, 19(3–4), 153–169.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Andersen, H. T., & van Kempen, R. (2003). New trends in urban policies in Europe: Evidence from the Netherlands and Denmark. Cities, 20(2), 77–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Balsas, C. J. L. (2007). City centre revitalization in Portugal. A study of Lisbon and Porto. Journal of Urban Design, 12(2), 231–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bonaiuto, M., Fornara, F., & Bonnes, M. (2003). Indexes of perceived residential environment quality and neighbourhood attachment in urban environments: A confirmation study on the city of Rome. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65(1–2), 41–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Brown, B., Perkins, D. D., & Brown, G. (2003). Place attachment in a revitalizing neighborhood: Individual and block levels of analysis. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(3), 259–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chavis, D. M., & Wandersman, A. (1990). Sense of community in the urban environment: A catalyst for participation and community development. American Journal of Community Psychology, 18(1), 55–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Coleman, J. S. (1988). ‘Social capital in the creation of human capital’, American Journal of Sociology, 94(Suppl.), 95–120.Google Scholar
  12. Collier, P. (2002). Social capital and poverty: A microeconomic perspective. The Role of social capital in development: An empirical assessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Costa, D. L., & Kahn, M. E. (2004). Civic engagement and community heterogeneity: An economist’s perspective. Perspectives on Politics, 1(1), 103–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Costanzo, L., & Ferrara, A. (2015) ‘Well-being indicators on landscape and cultural heritage: The experience of the BES project’. In F. Maggino (Ed.), A new research agenda for improvements in quality of life (pp. 1–15). New York: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  15. Coulton, C., Theodos, B., & Turner, M. A. (2012). Residential mobility and neighborhood change: Real neighborhoods under the microscope. Cityscape: A Journal of Policy Development and Research, 14(3), 55–89.Google Scholar
  16. Crowe, J. (2010). Community attachment and satisfaction: The role of a community’s social network structure. Journal of Community Psychology, 38(5), 622–644.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Das, D. (2008). Urban quality of life: A case study of Guwahati. Social Indicators Research, 88(2), 297–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Delken, E. (2008). Happiness in shrinking cities in Germany. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(2), 213–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Diener, E., & Lucas, R. E. (2004). ‘Subjective emotional well-being’. In M. Lewis & J. M. Haviland-Jones (Eds.), Handbook of emotions (2nd edn). New York: Guilford Publications.Google Scholar
  20. Elzerman, K., & Bontje, M. (2015). Urban shrinkage in Parkstad Limburg. European Planning Studies, 23(1), 87–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Francescato, G. (2002). Residential satisfaction research: The case for and against. In J. I. Aragonés, G. Francescato, & T. Gärling (Eds.), Residential environments: Choice, satisfaction and behaviour (pp. 15–34). Westport: Bergin and Garvey.Google Scholar
  22. Giuliani, M. V. (2003). Theory of attachment and place attachment. In M. Bonnes, T. Lee, & M. Bonaiuntom (Eds.), Psychological theories for environmental issues (pp. 137–170). Aldershot: Ashgate Publisher.Google Scholar
  23. Green, M. C., & Brock, T. C. (1998). Trust, mood, and outcomes of friendship determine preferences for real versus ersatz social capital. Political Psychology, 19(3), 527–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grillo, M. C., Teixeira, M. A., & Wilson, D. C. (2010). Residential satisfaction and civic engagement: Understanding the causes of community participation. Social Indicators Research, 97(3), 451–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Grinstein-Weiss, M., Yeo, Y., Anacker, K., van Zandt, S., Freeze, E. B., & Quercia, R. G. (2011). Homeownership and neighborhood satisfaction among low- and moderate-income households. Journal of Urban Affairs, 33(3), 247–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Grzeskowiak, S., Sirgy, M. J., & Widgery, R. (2003). Residents’ satisfaction with community services: Predictors and outcomes. The Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, 33(2), 1–33.Google Scholar
  27. Guimarães, M. H., Barreira, A. P., & Panagopoulos, T. (2015). Shrinking cities in Portugal—Where and why. Revista Portuguesa de Estudos Regionais, 40(3), 23–41.Google Scholar
  28. Haase, A., Hospers, G.-J., Pekelsma, S., & Rink, D. (2012). Front-runners in innovative citizen participation—Shrinking Areas, European Urban Knowledge Network.Google Scholar
  29. Haubermann, H., & Glock, B. (2004). New trends in urban development and public policy in Eastern Germany: Dealing with the vacant housing problem on the local level. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(4), 919–929.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Heikkilä, E., & Kashinoro, H. (2009). ‘Differential urbanization trends in Europe: The European case’. In H. S Geyer (Ed.), International handbook of urban policy: Issues in the developed world (Vol. 2, pp. 25–45). UK: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  31. Hidalgo, M. C., & Hernandez, B. (2001). Place attachment: Conceptual and empirical questions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(3), 273–281.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hollander, J. B. (2011). ‘Can a city successfully shrink? Evidence from survey data on neighborhood quality’, Urban Affairs Review, vo., 47(1), 129–141.Google Scholar
  33. Hollander, J. B., & Németh, J. (2011). The bounds of smart decline: A foundational theory for planning shrinking cities. Housing Policy Debate, 21(3), 349–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hospers, G.-J. (2014). Policy responses to urban shrinkage: From growth thinking to civic engagement. European Planning Studies, 22(7), 1507–1523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hur, M., & Morrow-Jones, H. (2008). Factors that influence resident’s satisfaction with neighborhood. Environment and Behavior, 40(5), 619–635.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. International Organization for Migration. (2011). Economic cycles, demographic change and migration, International Dialogue on Migration Workshop—The future of migration: Building capacities for change, Background Paper, 12–13 September 2011.Google Scholar
  37. Jeffres, L. W., Bracken, C. C., Jian, G., & Casey, M. F. (2009). The impact of third places on community quality of life. Applied Research in Quality of Life, 4(4), 333–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Knack, S. (2002). Social capital, growth, and poverty: A survey of cross country evidence. The role of social capital in development: An empirical assessment, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Lambiri, D., Biagi, B., & Royuela, V. (2007). Quality of life in the economic and urban economic literature. Social Indicators Research, 84(1), 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lee, Y.-J. (2008). Subjective quality of life measurement in Taipei. Building and Environment, 43(7), 1205–1215.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Longino, C., Perzynski, A., & Stolle, E. (2002). Pandora’s briefcase: Unpacking the retirement migration decision. Research on Aging, 24(1), 24–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Low, S. M., & Altman, I. (1992). Place attachment: A conceptual inquiry. In I. Altman & S. M. Low (Eds.), Place attachment (pp. 1–12). London: Plenum Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Manturuk, K., Lindblad, M., & Quercia, R. (2010). Friends and neighbors: Homeownership and social capital among low-to moderate-income families. Journal of Urban Affairs, 32(4), 471–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. McCrea, R., Shyy, T.-K., & Stimson, R. J. (2014). Satisfied residents in different types of local areas: Measuring what’s most important. Social Indicators Research, 118(1), 87–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McCrea, R., Stimson, R., & Western, J. (2005). Testing a moderated model of satisfaction with urban living using data for Brisbane-South East Queensland, Australia. Social Indicators Research, 72(2), 121–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Metzer, J. T. (2000). Planned abandonment. The neighbourhood life-cycle theory and national urban policy. Housing Policy Debate, 11(1), 7–40.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ogu, V. I. (2002). Urban residential satisfaction and the planning implications in a developing world context: The example of Benin City, Nigeria. International Planning Studies, 7(1), 37–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Oswalt, P., & Rieniets, T (eds). (2006). Atlas of shrinking cities, Hatje Cantz Publishers.Google Scholar
  49. Oswalt, P., & Rieniets, T. (2007). Global context. Shrinking cities. Shrinking Cities Web Site. Available from: http://www.shrinkingcities.com/globaler_kontext.0.html?&L=1
  50. Pallagst, K., Schwarz, T., Popper, F. J., & Hollander, J. B. (2009). Planning shrinking cities. Progress in Planning, 72(4), 223–232.Google Scholar
  51. Panagopoulos, T., & Barreira, A. P. (2012). Perceptions and shrink smart strategies for the municipalities of Portugal. Journal Built Environment, 38(2), 276–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Parkes, A., Kearns, A., & Atkinson, R. (2002). What makes people dissatisfied with their neighborhood? Urban Studies, 39(13), 2413–2438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Perez, F. R., Fernandez-Mayoralas, G., Rivera, F. E. P., & Abuin, J. M. R. (2001). Ageing in place: Predictors of the residential satisfaction of elderly. Social Indicators Research, 54(2), 173–208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Ringel, N., & Finkelstein, J. C. (1991). Differentiating neighborhood satisfaction and neighborhood attachment among urban residents. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 12(2), 177–193.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Scannell, L., & Gifford, R. (2010). Defining place attachment: A tripartite organizing framework. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(1), 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Sirgy, M. J., Rahtz, D. R., Cicic, M., & Underwood, R. (2000). A method for assessing residents’ satisfaction with community based services: A quality of life perspective. Social Indicators Research, 49(3), 279–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Speare, A. (1974). Residential satisfaction as an intervening variable in residential mobility. Demography, 11(2), 173–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Stapleton, C. M. (1980). Reformulation of the family life-cycle concept: Implications for residential mobility. Environment and Planning A, 12(10), 1103–1118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Talmage, C. A. (2015). ‘Making the ordinary extraordinary: A fresh look at satisfaction in communities’. In F. Maggino (Ed.), A new research agenda for improvements in quality of life (pp. 61–86). New York: Springer International Publishing.Google Scholar
  60. Turok, I., & Mykhnenko, V. (2007). The trajectories of European cities, 1960–2005. Cities, 24(3), 165–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Twigger-Ross, C. L., & Uzzell, D. L. (1996). ‘Place and identity processes’. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16(3), 205–220.Google Scholar
  62. van Dalen, H. P., & Henkens, K. (2011). Who fears and who welcomes population decline? Demographic Research, 25(13), 437–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ana Paula Barreira
    • 1
  • Maria Helena Guimarães
    • 2
  • Thomas Panagopoulos
    • 3
  1. 1.Faculty of EconomyUniversity of AlgarveFaroPortugal
  2. 2.Instituto de Ciências Agrárias e Ambientais Mediterrânicas (ICAAM)Universidade de ÉvoraÉvoraPortugal
  3. 3.Faculty of Science and TechnologyUniversity of AlgarveFaroPortugal

Personalised recommendations