Skip to main content

Biobank and Expertise Networks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Biobanking of Human Biospecimens

Abstract

Since the year 2000 the number and size of biobank networks has grown in response to the rising research demand for high quality, well-annotated biological samples. So too have the number of expertise networks in which individuals share knowledge, to advance the field of biobanking. This chapter reviews the characteristics of biobank networks and provides case studies of three well-established examples: the Cooperative Human Tissue Network in the USA, the Canadian Tissue Repository Network (CTRNet) and the Korean National Network for Research Resource Centres (KNRRC). Next, there are case studies of three successful expertise networks: the International Society for Biological and Environmental Repositories (ISBER), the European, Middle Eastern and African Society for Biopreservation and Biobanking (ESBB) and the French Club 3C-R. This is followed by comparison of biobank and expertise networks, where it is noted that as biobank networks expand to the national and international level, they take on many of the characteristics of expertise networks. The chapter concludes with some thoughts about the shared objectives of biobank and expertise networks and the need for good communication between networks.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 149.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. OECD (2009) Creation and governance of human genetic research databases. http://www.oecd.org/sti/biotechnology/hbgrd. Accessed 1 Feb 2015

  2. Hewitt R, Watson P (2013) Defining biobank. Biopreserv Biobank 11(5):309–315. doi:10.1089/bio.2013.0042

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. World Federation for Culture Collections (WFCC). http://www.wfcc.info. Accessed 14 Feb 2015

  4. Clausen KP, Grizzle WE, Livolsi V, Newton WA Jr, Aamodt R (1989) Special communication. The cooperative human tissue network. Cancer 63(7):1452–1455

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Watson P (2010) Canadian tumour repository network. Biopreserv Biobank 8(4):181–185. doi:10.1089/bio.2010.8405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Lee D, Lee Y (2009) The Korea national research resource center. Biopreserv Biobank 7(3):137–142. doi:10.1089/bio.2009.0007

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yuille M, van Ommen GJ, Brechot C et al (2008) Biobanking for Europe. Brief Bioinform 9(1):14–24. doi:10.1093/bib/bbm050

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Morente MM, de Alava E, Fernandez PL (2007) Tumour banking: the Spanish design. Pathobiology 74(4):245–250. doi:10.1159/000104452

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Riegman PH, Dinjens WN, Oomen MH et al (2006) TuBaFrost 1: Uniting local frozen tumour banks into a European network: an overview. Eur J Cancer 42(16):2678–2683. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2006.04.031

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Isabelle M, Teodorovic I, Morente MM et al (2006) TuBaFrost 5: multifunctional central database application for a European tumor bank. Eur J Cancer 42(18):3103–3109. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2006.04.032

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lopez-Guerrero JA, Riegman PH, Oosterhuis JW et al (2006) TuBaFrost 4: access rules and incentives for a European tumour bank. Eur J Cancer 42(17):2924–2929. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2006.04.030

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Morente MM, Mager R, Alonso S et al (2006) TuBaFrost 2: Standardising tissue collection and quality control procedures for a European virtual frozen tissue bank network. Eur J Cancer 42(16):2684–2691. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2006.04.029

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Teodorovic I, Isabelle M, Carbone A et al (2006) TuBaFrost 6: virtual microscopy in virtual tumour banking. Eur J Cancer 42(18):3110–3116. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2006.04.033

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. van Veen EB, Riegman PH, Dinjens WN et al (2006) TuBaFrost 3: regulatory and ethical issues on the exchange of residual tissue for research across Europe. Eur J Cancer 42(17):2914–2923. doi:10.1016/j.ejca.2006.04.028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Filocamo M, Baldo C, Goldwurm S et al (2013) Telethon Network of Genetic Biobanks: a key service for diagnosis and research on rare diseases. Orphanet J Rare Dis 8:129. doi:10.1186/1750-1172-8-129

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Asslaber M, Zatloukal K (2007) Biobanks: transnational, European and global networks. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic 6(3):193–201. doi:10.1093/bfgp/elm023

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Watson PH, Nussbeck SY, Carter C et al (2014) A framework for biobank sustainability. Biopreserv Biobank 12(1):60–68. doi:10.1089/bio.2013.0064

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Shickle D, Griffin M, El-Arifi K (2010) Inter- and intra-biobank networks: classification of biobanks. Pathobiology 77(4):181–190. doi:10.1159/000292651

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Carpenter J (2011) Australian Breast Cancer Tissue Bank (ABCTB). Biopreserv Biobank 9(3):217. doi:10.1089/bio.2011.9325

    Google Scholar 

  20. Morente MM, Cereceda L, Luna-Crespo F, Artiga MJ (2011) Managing a biobank network. Biopreserv Biobank 9(2):187–190. doi:10.1089/bio.2011.0005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Cooperative Human Tissue Network (CHTN). http://www.chtn.nci.nih.gov/. Accessed 1 Feb 2015

  22. Univ_Alabama University of Alabama at Birmingham Tissue Collection and Banking Facility. http://www.uab.edu/medicine/tcbf/. Accessed 1 Feb 2015

  23. CAPCA Models for Tumor Bank Programs in Canada. CAPCA Tumor Bank Working Group. http://www.cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/24198.html.

  24. Watson PH (1999) Tumor tissue and clinical databanks—a review of the importance, role and future of tumor banks. Cancer Strategy 6:1–6

    Google Scholar 

  25. Matzke EA, O'Donoghue S, Barnes RO et al (2012) Certification for biobanks: the program developed by the Canadian Tumour Repository Network (CTRNet). Biopreserv Biobank 10(5):426–432. doi:10.1089/bio.2012.0026

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Le Page C, Kobel M, de Ladurantaye M et al (2013) Specimen quality evaluation in Canadian biobanks participating in the COEUR repository. Biopreserv Biobank 11(2):83–93. doi:10.1089/bio.2012.0044

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Korean Network for Research Resource Centers (KNRRC). http://www.knrrc.or.kr. Accessed 1 Feb 2015

  28. Asian Network for Research Resource Centers (ANRRC). http://www.anrrc.org. Accessed 1 Feb 2015

  29. International Society for Biological and Environmental Repositories (ISBER). http://www.isber.org. Accessed 1 Feb 2015

  30. ISBER_BP ISBER’s Best Practices for Biorepositories. http://www.isber.org/?page=BPR. Accessed 1 Feb 2015

  31. ISBER_SAT ISBER Self Assessment Tool. http://www.isber.org/?page=SAT. Accessed 1 Feb 2015

  32. Pugh RS (2014) Overview of the International Society for Biological and Environmental Repositories (ISBER) Working Groups. Biopreserv Biobank 12(5):358–360. doi:10.1089/bio.2014.1252

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Hewitt SM, Badve SS, True LD (2012) Impact of preanalytic factors on the design and application of integral biomarkers for directing patient therapy. Clin Cancer Res 18:1524–1530

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Biospecimen Science Working Group (ISBER). https://isber.site-ym.com/?page=BS. Accessed 4 Aug 2016

  35. ISO Technical committee TC 276. http://www.iso.org/iso/home/standards_development/list_of_iso_technical_committees/iso_technical_committee.htm?commid=4514241. Accessed 4 Aug 2016

  36. Schroder C, Corfield J, di Donato JH et al (2014) The Research Biobank of the year competition of the European, Middle Eastern and African Society for Biopreservation and Biobanking (ESBB): aims and achievements. Biopreserv Biobank 12(2):154–160. doi:10.1089/bio.2014.0004

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Gray B (1989) Collaborating: finding common ground for multiparty problems, 1st edn. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco

    Google Scholar 

  38. Zatloukal K, Vaught J (2012) What are the next steps to overcoming roadblocks to transnational biobank collaboration? Biopreserv Biobank 10(1):2–3. doi:10.1089/bio.2012.1014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Jackie Mackenzie-Dodds (Natural History Museum, London, UK) and Christina Schroeder (Fraunhofer IZI-BB, Potsdam-Golm, Germany) for their valuable contributions to this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. Vaught .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Hewitt, R.E., Grizzle, W.E., Watson, P.H., Lee, Y., di Donato, JH., Vaught, J. (2017). Biobank and Expertise Networks. In: Hainaut, P., Vaught, J., Zatloukal, K., Pasterk, M. (eds) Biobanking of Human Biospecimens. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-55120-3_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics