Beyond the Small-Scale Fisheries Guidelines: Tenure Rights and Informed Consent in Indigenous Fisheries of Nicaragua

Chapter
First Online:
Part of the MARE Publication Series book series (MARE, volume 14)

Abstract

This contribution seeks to provide an overview of policy actions taken by the government of Nicaragua in relation to critical aspects of the Voluntary Guidelines on the Responsible Governance of Tenure (FAO 2012) as well as the Voluntary Guidelines for Securing Sustainable Small-Scale Fisheries (SSF Guidelines) (FAO 2015), which are concerned with the governance of Indigenous peoples’ customary tenure systems, including the rights to aquatic resources. The chapter devotes attention to the relationship between provisions to land and aquatic rights, assesses the impact of recent programs of land titling on Indigenous collective property rights and access to fisheries, and identifies gaps in the process of implementation in the Rama-Kriol territory. It also explores the implications for the human rights of Indigenous and Afro-descendant peoples emerging from the prospective construction of an Interoceanic Canal, a large-scale infrastructure project vigorously endorsed by the Nicaraguan government. This chapter suggests that, in this context, the SSF Guidelines alone hold little practical value in shifting the balance towards protecting the rights of Indigenous fisheries. Therefore, the implementation of the Guidelines should consider their potential synergies in tandem with other instruments in national and international law.

Keywords

Nicaragua Indigenous fisheries Interoceanic canal Small-scale fisheries Rama-Kriol territory 
This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

References

  1. Acosta, M. L. (2007). La política del estado de Nicaragua sobre las tierras indígenas de las regiones autónomas de la costa atlántica. Wani, 33, 35–48.Google Scholar
  2. Acosta, M. L., Moreno, E., & Weil, D. (2002). Condiciones laborales de los buzos miskitos en la costa atlántica de Nicaragua. San José: Oficina Internacional del Trabajo.Google Scholar
  3. Anaya, S. J., & Grossman, C. (2002). The case of Awas Tingni v Nicaragua: A new step in the international law of Indigenous peoples. Journal of International and Comparative Law, 19(1), 1–15.Google Scholar
  4. Asamblea Nacional de Nicaragua. (1904). Código civil de la república de Nicaragua, Managua, Nicaragua. https://www.oas.org/dil/esp/Codigo_Civil_Nicaragua.pdf. Accessed 1 Dec 2016.
  5. Asamblea Nacional de Nicaragua. (1987). Estatuto de autonomía de las regiones de la costa atlántica de Nicaragua (La Gaceta No. 238). Managua: Asamblea Nacional de Nicaragua.Google Scholar
  6. Asamblea Nacional de Nicaragua. (2013). Ley no. 840. Ley especial para el desarrollo de infraestructura y transporte Nicaraguense atingente al canal, zonas de libre comercio e infraestructuras asociadas (La Gaceta, CXVII, June 14 2013). Managua: Asamblea Nacional de Nicaragua.Google Scholar
  7. Asamblea Nacional de Nicaragua. (2016). Convenio de Consentimiento Previo, Libre e Informado para la Implementacion del Proyecto de Desarrollo del Gran Canal Interoceanico de Nicaragua (La Gaceta No. 85, September 5 2016). Managua: Asamblea Nacional de Nicaragua.Google Scholar
  8. Béné, C. (2003). When fishery rhymes with poverty: A first step beyond the old paradigm on poverty in small-scale fisheries. World Development, 31(6), 949–975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Campos, V. (2013). The canal will irreversibly damage Lake Cocibolca. Envío, 384. http://www.envio.org.ni/articulo/4726. Accessed 1 Nov 2016.
  10. Centro de Asistencia Legal a los Pueblos Indígena de la Costa Atlántica. (2016). We do not consent [Documentary Film]. https://drive.google.com/file/d/0B1FGs5LsBqBHbi0tcFUyZUN5SXc/view. Accessed 25 Nov 2016.
  11. Christie, P. (2000). The people and natural resources of Pearl Lagoon. In P. Christie et al. (Eds.), Taking care of what we have. Participatory natural resource management on the Caribbean Coast of Nicaragua (pp. 17–46). Ottawa: CIDCA-IDRC.Google Scholar
  12. Chuenpagdee, R. (Ed.). (2011a). World small-scale fisheries. Contemporary visions. Delft: Eburon.Google Scholar
  13. Chuenpagdee, R. (2011b). Thinking big on small-scale fisheries. In V. Christensen & J. Maclean (Eds.), Ecosystem approaches to fisheries: A global perspective (pp. 226–240). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. CONADETI. (2013). Informe ejecutivo Conadeti y Cid. Bilwi, Nicaragua CONADETI. http://www.poderjudicial.gob.ni/pjupload/costacaribe/pdf/informe_costacaribe3006.pdf. Accessed 1 Dec 2016.
  15. Corte Suprema de Justicia. (2013). Sentencia número 30-2013. Managua: Corte Suprema de Justicia.Google Scholar
  16. Corte Suprema de Justicia. (2016). La constitución política y sus reformas. Managua: Biblioteca Jurídica.Google Scholar
  17. Daw, T. M. (2008). Spatial distribution of effort by artisanal fishers: Exploring economic factors affecting the lobster fisheries of the Corn Islands, Nicaragua. Fisheries Research, 90, 17–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Deepananda, K., Ashoka, H. M., Amarasinghe, U. S., & Jayasinghe-Mudalige, U. K. (2015). Indigenous knowledge in the beach seine fisheries in Sri Lanka: An indispensable factor in community-based fisheries management. Marine Policy, 57(Complete), 69–77. doi: 10.1016/j.marpol.2015.03.028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. El 19 Digital. (2016, May 3). Firman acuerdo de consentimiento para uso de tierras del Gobierno Territorial Rama y Kriol.’ https://www.el19digital.com/articulos/ver/titulo:41492-firman-acuerdo-de-consentimiento-para-uso-de-tierras-del-gobierno-territorial-rama-y-kriol. Accessed 25 Nov 2016.
  20. FAO. (2012). Voluntary guidelines on the responsible governance of tenure of land, fisheries and forest in the context of national food security. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
  21. FAO. (2015). Voluntary guidelines for securing sustainable small-scale fisheries in the context of food security and poverty eradication. Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
  22. Finley-Brook, M. (2011). ‘We are the owners’: Autonomy and natural resources in northeastern Nicaragua. In L. Baracco (Ed.), National integration and contested autonomy. The Caribbean coast of Nicaragua (pp. 309–335). New York: Algora.Google Scholar
  23. Frühling, P., González, M., & Buvollen, H. P. (2007). Etnicidad y nación. El desarrollo de la autonomía de la Costa Atlántica de Nicaragua: 1987–2007. Guatemala City: Guatemala: F and G Editores.Google Scholar
  24. Gobierno Territorial Rama y Kriol, GRT-K. (2014). Lineamientos para realizar un proceso de consulta en el territorio Rama y Kriol en relación al Proyecto Gran Canal Interoceanico y sub proyectos asociados. Bluefields: GRT-K.Google Scholar
  25. Gobierno Territorial Rama y Kriol, GRT-K. (2017). Diagnostico del Territorio Rama-Kriol. Bluefields: GRT-K.Google Scholar
  26. Goett, J. (2016, May 20). In Nicaragua, the latest zombie megaproject. Nacla. http://nacla.org/news/2016/05/20/nicaragua-latest-zombie-megaproject. Accessed 10 Nov 2016.
  27. González, M. (2011). To make a life in Marshall Point: Community empowerment and small-scale fishery. In S. Jentoft & A. Eide (Eds.), Poverty mosaics. A better future in small-scale fisheries (pp. 275–308). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. González, M. (2016). The unmaking of self-determination: Twenty-five years of regional autonomy in Nicaragua. Bulletin of Latin America Research (BLAR), 33(3), 306–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. González, C., & Jentoft, S. (2010). MPA in labor: Securing the Pearl Cays of Nicaragua. Environmental Management, 47(4), 617–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. González, M., Koskinen, A., Jentoft, S., & Lopez, D. (2006). The rama people: Struggling for land and culture. Managua: URACCAN and University of Tromso-Norway.Google Scholar
  31. Hale, C. R. (1994). Resistance and contradiction. Mískitu Indians and the Nicaraguan state, 1894-1987. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  32. HKND Group & ERM. (2015). Canal de Nicaragua: Environmental and social impact assessment. Managua: ESIA, HKND Group. http://hknd-group.com/portal.php?mod=viewandaid=243. Accessed 27 Nov 2016.Google Scholar
  33. Hostetler, M. (2005). Enhancing local livelihood options: Capacity development and participatory project monitoring in Caribbean Nicaragua. Doctoral dissertation, York University, Toronto.Google Scholar
  34. Huete-Pérez, J., Alvarez, P. J., Schnoor, J. L., Rittmann, B. E., Clayton, A., Acosta, M. L., Bicudo, C. E., Arroyo, M. T., Brett, M. T., Campos, V. M., Chaimovich, H., Jimenez-Cisneros, B., Covich, A., Lacerda, L. D., Maes, J. M., Miranda, J. C., Montenegro-Guillén, S., Ortega-Hegg, M., Urquhart, G. R., Vammen, K., & Zambrano, L. (2015). Scientists raise alarms about fast tracking of transoceanic canal through Nicaragua. Environmental Science & Technology, 49, 3989–3996.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Huete-Pérez, J., Meyer, A., & Alvarez, P. J. (2016). Rethink the Nicaraguan Canal. Science, 347(6220), 354–355.Google Scholar
  36. INPESCA. (2015). Anuario Pesquero y Acuicola 2015. Managua: INPESCA.Google Scholar
  37. Jentoft, S., & Chuenpagdee, R. (2009). Fisheries and coastal governance as a wicked problem. Marine Policy, 33, 553–560.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jentoft, S., & Eide, A. (Eds.). (2011). Poverty mosaics: Realities and prospects in small-scale fisheries. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  39. Johnson, T. (2015). Remaking world trade. McClatchy DC. http://media.mcclatchydc.com/static/features/NicaCanal/. Accessed 6 Dec 2016.
  40. Kooiman, J., Bavinck, M., Jentoft, S., & Pullin, R. S. V. (Eds.). (2005). Fish for life: Interactive governance for fisheries. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.Google Scholar
  41. Lagueux, C. J., & Campbell, C. L. (2005). Marine turtle nesting and conservation needs on the south-east coast of Nicaragua. Oryx, 39(4), 398–405.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Larson, A. M., & Soto, F. (2012). Territorialidad y gobernanza: Tejiendo retos en los territorios Indígenas de la RAAN. Managua: Nitlapan-UCA.Google Scholar
  43. López, M. (2014). Truths about the canal concession all Nicaraguans should know. Envío, 390. http://www.envio.org.ni/articulo/4805. Accessed 1 Nov 2016.
  44. Mansfield, B. (2004). Neoliberalism in the oceans: ‘Rationalization’, property rights, and the commons question. Geoforum, 35(3), 313–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Mendoza, L. J. (2016). Gobernanza de la propiedad comunal: Institucionalidad para la administración de la propiedad de la tierra y los recursos naturales. Paper presented at the Seminar Encuentro de Saberes, Palma Real, Peru, August 14 2016.Google Scholar
  46. Meyer, A., & Huete-Pérez, J. (2014). Nicaragua could wreak environmental ruin. Nature, 505, 288–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Neiland, A., Madakan, S., & Béné, C. (2005). Traditional management systems, poverty and change in the arid zone fisheries of northern Nigeria. Journal of Agrarian Change, 5(1), 117–148.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Nietschmann, B. (1973). Between land and water: The subsistence ecology of the Miskito Indians, eastern Nicaragua. New York: Seminar Press.Google Scholar
  49. PNUD. (2005). Informe de Desarrollo Humano 2005: Las regiones autónomas de la costa Caribe. Nicaragua asume su diversidad. Managua: PNUD.Google Scholar
  50. Procuraduría General de la República. (2016). Títulos entregados por el GRUN. http://www.pgr.gob.ni/index.php/entregados-por-el-grun. Accessed 1 Nov 2016.
  51. Pro-Nicaragua. (2016). Políticas y proyectos de desarrollo para potenciar la inversión 2017–2021. www.PRONicaragua.gob.ni. Accessed 1 Nov 2016.
  52. Roe, K. H. (2006). Indigenous ecological knowledge and marine resource management: Perceptions within a Rama community. In M. González, A. Koskinen, S. Jentoft, & D. Lopez (Eds.), The Rama: Struggling for land and culture (pp. 107–123). Managua: URACCAN and University of Tromso-Norway.Google Scholar
  53. Salas, S., Chuenpagdee, R., Charles, A., & Seijo, J. C., (Eds.) (2011). Coastal fisheries of Latin America and the Caribbean. (FAO Fisheries and Aquaculture Technical Paper 544). Rome: Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations.Google Scholar
  54. Tress, B. Tress, G., & Fry, G. (2005). Defining concepts and the process of knowledge production in integrative research. Published online at Learning for Sustainability (LfS), http://learningforsustainability.net/research/interdisciplinary.php#integration. Accessed 1 Aug 2016.
  55. United Nations Development Program. (2011). Experiences of titling of Indigenous territories. Main breakthroughs. UNDP-Caribbean Coast Program Preparatory Meeting of the Conclave of Latin America and the Caribbean, Managua, April 4–6 2011.Google Scholar
  56. Wade, L. (2016). A nation divided. Science, 351(6270), 220–223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Williamson, D. (2016). Contribución de las regiones autónomas al Producto Interno Bruto de Nicaragua. Revista Electrónica de Investigación en Ciencias Económicas, 4(7), 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Williamson, D., & Fonseca, G. (2007). Compendio estadístico de las regions autónomas de la costa Caribe de Nicaragua. Managua: CIDCA-UCA.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Social ScienceYork UniversityTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations