Practising Journalism on Twitter? A Computational Analysis of British Journalists’ Use of Twitter Before the 2016 EU Referendum in the UK

Chapter

Abstract

This chapter examines the tweeting activities of 20 journalists from four selected British national news outlets during one month before the United Kingdom’s European Union referendum and the discourses about the referendum constructed in their tweets. It aims to assess the extent to which their tweeting activities can be seen as journalistic practice. Our analysis confirms that their tweeting practices are very different from those of general Twitter users but similar to those of their newspapers. They are evidently applying journalistic principles and values to their tweeting practices. Their performance on Twitter made them stand out and reflected their professional consciousness. They focused on tweeting about the referendum itself rather than private life-related issues, such as their own experiences or opinions about the EU. The journalists largely had the same stance about the referendum as their newspapers. However, on some occasions, journalists indeed made personal comments and retweeted tweets by the opposing side, though this may be related to the fact that most newspapers only made their stance clear late in the campaign. Therefore, journalists’ tweeting practices lie somewhere in the continuum with journalistic practice at one end and nonjournalistic practice at the other end, although close to the journalistic practice end.

References

  1. Baker, P. (2006). Using copora in discourse analysis. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  2. Baker, P., Gabrielatos, C., Khosravinik, M., Krzyzanowski, M., Mcenery, T., & Wodak, R. (2008). A useful methodological synergy? Combining critical discourse analysis and corpus linguistics to examine discourses of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press. Discourse & Society, 19, 273–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bouvier, G. (2015). What is a discourse approach to Twitter, Facebook, Youtube and other social media: Connecting with other academic fields? Journal of Multicultural Discourses, 10, 149–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brown, C., Hendrickson, E., & Littau, J. (2014). New opportunities for diversity: Twitter, journalists and traditionally underserved communities. Journal of Social Media Studies, 1, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bruns, A. (2012). Journalists and Twitter: How Australian news organisations adapt to a new medium. Media International Australia Incorporating Culture and Policy, 144, 97–107.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Burns, A. (2010). Oblique strategies for ambient journalism. M/C Journal, 13.Google Scholar
  7. Cunha, E., Magno, G., Comarela, G., Almeida, V., Gonçalve, M. A., and Benevenuto, F. (2011). Analyzing the dynamic evolution of hashtags on Twitter: A language-based approach. In LSM ‘11 Proceedings of the Workshop on Languages in Social Media (pp. 58–65). Stroudsburg, PA: Association for Computational Linguistics.Google Scholar
  8. Cunha, E., Magno, G., Gonçalves, M. A., Cambraia, C., & Almeida, V. (2014). He votes or she votes? Female and male discursive strategies in Twitter political hashtags. PLoS One, 9, e87041.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dahlgren, P. (2016). Professional and citizen journalism: Tensions and complements. In J. C. Alexander, E. B. Breese, & M. Luengo (Eds.), The crisis of journalism reconsidered. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Gabrielatos, C., & Baker, P. (2008). Fleeing, sneaking, flooding: A corpus analysis of discursive constructions of refugees and asylum seekers in the UK press, 1996–2005. Journal of English Linguistics, 36, 5–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gatto, M. (2014). The web as corpus: Theory and practice. London: Bloomsbury.Google Scholar
  12. Gulyas, A. (2013). The influence of professional variables on journalists’ uses and views of social media. Digital Journalism, 1, 270–285.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hanusch‚ F.‚ & Bruns‚ A. (2017). Journalistic branding on Twitter. Digital Journalism, 5(1)‚ 26–43.Google Scholar
  14. Hardaker, C., & Mcglashan, M. (2016). Real men don’t hate women: Twitter rape threats and group identity. Journal of Pragmatics, 91, 80–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hermida, A. (2010). Twittering the news. Journalism Practice, 4, 297–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hermida, A. (2012). Tweets and truth: Journalism as a discipline of collaborative verification. Journalism Practice, 6, 659–668.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hermida, A. (2013). #JOURNALISM: Reconfiguring journalism research about Twitter, one tweet at a time. Digital Journalism, 1, 295–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hundt, M., Nesselhauf, N., & Biewer, C. (2007). Corpus linguistics and the web. Amsterdam: Rodopi.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lasorsa, D. L., Lewis, S. C., & Holton, A. E. (2012). Normalizing Twitter. Journalism Studies, 13, 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lawrence, R. G., Molyneux, L., Coddington, M., & Holton, A. (2014). Tweeting conventions: Political journalists’ use of Twitter to cover the 2012 presidential campaign. Jouranlism Studies, 15, 789–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Lee, N. Y., Kim, Y., & Kim, J. (2016). Tweeting public affairs or personal affairs? Journalists’ tweets, interactivity, and ideology. Journalism, 17(7)‚ 845–864.Google Scholar
  22. Lewis, S. C. (2012). The tension between professional control and open participation: Journalism and its boundaries. Information, Communication & Society, 15, 836–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lewis, S. C., Zamith, R., & Hermida, A. (2013). Content analysis in an era of big data: A hybrid approach to computational and manual methods. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 57, 34–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lim, M. (2012). Clicks, cabs, and coffee houses: Social media and oppositional movement in Egypt, 2004–2011. Journal of Communication, 62, 231–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Marwick, A., & Boyd, D. (2011). To see and be seen: Celebrity practice on Twitter. Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies, 17, 139–158.Google Scholar
  26. Mcenery, T., & Hardie, A. (2012). The web as corpus: Theory and practice (corpus and discourse). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Molyneux, L. (2015). What journalists retweet: Opinion, humor, and brand development on Twitter. Journalism, 16, 920–935.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mourão, R. R. (2015). The boys on the timeline: Political journalists’ use of Twitter for building interpretive communities. Journalism, 16, 1107–1123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Nuernbergk, C. (2016). Political journalists’ interaction networks: The German Federal Press Conference on Twitter. Journalism Practice, 10(7)‚ 868–879.Google Scholar
  30. Olausson‚ U. (2017). The reinvented journalist: The discursive construction of professional identity on Twitter. Digital Journalism, 5(1)‚ 61–81.Google Scholar
  31. Page, R. (2012). The linguistics of self-branding and micro-celebrity in Twitter: The role of hashtags. Discourse & Communication, 6, 181–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Page, R. (2014). Saying “Sorry”: Corporate apologies posted on Twitter. Journal of Pragmatics, 62, 30–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Pak, A., & Paroubek, P. (2010). Twitter as a corpus for sentiment analysis and opinion mining. LREc, 10, 1320–1326.Google Scholar
  34. Parmelee, J. H. (2013). Political journalists and Twitter: Influences on norms and practices. Journal of Media Practice, 14, 291–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Revers, M. (2014). The twitterization of news making: Transparency and journalistic professionalism. Journal of Communication, 64, 806–826.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Scott, K. (2015). The pragmatics of hashtags: Inference and conversational style on Twitter. Journal of Pragmatics, 81, 8–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Seargeant, P., & Tagg, C. (2014). The language of social media: Communication and community on the Internet. London: Palgrave.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Verweij, P., & Noort, E. V. (2014). Journalists’ Twitter networks, public debates and relationships in South Africa. Digital Journalism, 2, 98–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Vis, F. (2013). Twitter as a reporting tool for breaking news: Journalists tweeting the 2011 UK riots. Digital Journalism, 1, 27–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Vu, H. T. (2014). The online audience as gatekeeper: The influence of reader metrics on news editorial selection. Journalism, 15, 1094–1110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Zappavigna, M. (2011). Ambient affiliation: A linguistic perspective on Twitter. New Media & Society, 13, 788–806.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Zappavigna, M. (2013). Discourse of Twitter and social media: How we use language to create affiliation on the web. London: Bloomsbury Academic.Google Scholar
  43. Zappavigna, M. (2014). Coffeetweets: Bonding around the bean on Twitter. In P. Seargeant & C. Tagg (Eds.), The language of social media: Communication and community on the Internet. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Brunel University LondonLondonUK
  2. 2.Independent ResearcherLondonUK

Personalised recommendations