Skip to main content

Complications of Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearings: Fracture, Stripe Wear, and Squeaking

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Complications after Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty

Abstract

Ceramic-on-ceramic (CoC) articulations were developed as an alternative bearing to conventional metal-on-polyethylene (MoP) bearings in order to decrease bearing surface wear and hopefully increase implant longevity. Overall, CoC bearings have the lowest rate of wear among all bearing [1] surfaces and are not associated with complications such as osteolysis and tissue necrosis linked with MoP and metal-on-metal (MoM) articulations, respectively. Despite ceramics’ superior tribological properties, their use has been associated with other complications such as fracture, edge loading, and squeaking. Edge loading and benign squeaking have little clinical significance, while pathological squeaking and fractures are rare. Despite the low rate of clinical complications seen, these factors deter surgeons from routinely using ceramic bearings in total hip arthroplasty (THA). This chapter further expands on these complications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 129.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Sentuerk U, von Roth P, Perka C. Ceramic on ceramic arthroplasty of the hip: new materials confirm appropriate use in young patients. Bone Joint J. 2016;98-B(1 Suppl A):14–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Willmann G. Ceramic femoral head retrieval data. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;379:22–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Massin P, et al. Does Biolox Delta ceramic reduce the rate of component fractures in total hip replacement? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014;100(6 Suppl):S317–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Boehler M, et al. Long-term results of uncemented alumina acetabular implants. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1994;76(1):53–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Callaway GH, et al. Fracture of the femoral head after ceramic-on-polyethylene total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 1995;10(6):855–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Koo KH, et al. Isolated fracture of the ceramic head after third-generation alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(2):329–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Park KS, Seon JK, Yoon TR. The survival analysis in third-generation ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2015;30(11):1976–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jeffers JR, Walter WL. Ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in hip arthroplasty: state of the art and the future. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94(6):735–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Weisse B, et al. Influence of contaminants in the stem-ball interface on the static fracture load of ceramic hip joint ball heads. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 2008;222(5):829–35.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hartmuth Kiefer SU, Scheuber LF, Atzrodt V. Practical guide for the use of ceramic implants. In: Clinical Management of Hip Arthroplasty. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag; 2014.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Squire M, et al. Acetabular component deformation with press-fit fixation. J Arthroplast. 2006;21(6 Suppl 2):72–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hamilton WG, et al. THA with Delta ceramic on ceramic: results of a multicenter investigational device exemption trial. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(2):358–66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Lusty PJ, et al. Wear and acetabular component orientation in third generation alumina-on-alumina ceramic bearings: an analysis of 33 retrievals [corrected]. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2007;89(9):1158–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Elkins JM, et al. Fracture propagation propensity of ceramic liners during impingement-subluxation: a finite element exploration. J Arthroplast. 2012;27(4):520–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Elkins JM, et al. Do obesity and/or stripe wear increase ceramic liner fracture risk? An XFEM analysis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2013;471(2):527–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Ha YC, et al. Ceramic liner fracture after cementless alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2007;458:106–10.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Toni A, et al. Early diagnosis of ceramic liner fracture. Guidelines based on a twelve-year clinical experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(Suppl 4):55–63.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Park YS, et al. Ceramic failure after total hip arthroplasty with an alumina-on-alumina bearing. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2006;88(4):780–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Endo Y, et al. Imaging of ceramic liner fractures in total hip arthroplasty: the value of CT. Skelet Radiol. 2015;44(8):1189–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Abdel MP, et al. Ceramic liner fractures presenting as squeaking after primary total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014;96(1):27–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Dacheux C, et al. Incidental discovery of an undisplaced ceramic liner fracture at total hip arthroplasty revision for squeaking. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013;99(5):631–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Berry DJ, Abdel MP, Callaghan JJ. What are the current clinical issues in wear and tribocorrosion? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(12):3659–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Koo KH, et al. Revision of ceramic head fracture after third generation ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2014;29(1):214–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Pulliam IT, Trousdale RT. Fracture of a ceramic femoral head after a revision operation. A case report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1997;79(1):118–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Lee SJ, et al. Bearing change to metal-on-polyethylene for ceramic bearing fracture in total hip arthroplasty; does it work? J Arthroplast. 2016;31(1):204–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Allain J, et al. Revision total hip arthroplasty performed after fracture of a ceramic femoral head. A multicenter survivorship study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;85-A(5):825–30.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jack CM, et al. The use of ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in isolated revision of the acetabular component. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B(3):333–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Chang JD, et al. Third-generation ceramic-on-ceramic bearing surfaces in revision total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2009;24(8):1231–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rodriguez-gonzalez FA. Biomaterials in orthopaedic surgery. Materials Park: ASM International; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Griss P, Heimke G. Five years experience with ceramic-metal-composite hip endoprostheses. I. Clinical evaluation. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1981;98(3):157–64.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mittelmeier H, Heisel J. Sixteen-years’ experience with ceramic hip prostheses. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;282:64–72.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Boutin P, et al. The use of dense alumina-alumina ceramic combination in total hip replacement. J Biomed Mater Res. 1988;22(12):1203–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Macdonald N, Bankes M. Ceramic on ceramic hip prostheses: a review of past and modern materials. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2014;134(9):1325–33.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Cales B. Zirconia as a sliding material: histologic, laboratory, and clinical data. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2000;379:94–112.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Piconi C, Maccauro G. Zirconia as a ceramic biomaterial. Biomaterials. 1999;20(1):1–25.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Clarke IC, Manaka M, Green DD, et al. Current status of zirconia used in total hip implants. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2003;58-A(4):73–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Dearnley PA. A review of metallic, ceramic, and surface-treated metals used for bearing surfaces in human joint replacements. Proc Inst Mech Eng H. 1999;213(2):107–33.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Allain J, et al. Poor eight-year survival of cemented zirconia-polyethylene total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1999;81(5):835–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Haraguchi K, et al. Phase transformation of a zirconia ceramic head after total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83(7):996–1000.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Fruh HJ, Willmann G, Pfaff HG. Wear characteristics of ceramic-on-ceramic for hip endoprostheses. Biomaterials. 1997;18(12):873–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Willmann G, Fruh HJ, Pfaff HG. Wear characteristics of sliding pairs of zirconia (Y-TZP) for hip endoprostheses. Biomaterials. 1996;17(22):2157–62.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Winter M, et al. Ten- to 14-year results of a ceramic hip prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1992;282:73–80.

    Google Scholar 

  43. Hannouche D, et al. Fractures of ceramic bearings: history and present status. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003;417:19–26.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Lee YK, et al. Alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty: a concise follow-up, at a minimum of ten years, of a previous report. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(8):1715–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Lusty PJ, et al. Third-generation alumina-on-alumina ceramic bearings in cementless total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007;89(12):2676–83.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Choi IY, et al. Incidence and factors associated with squeaking in alumina-on-alumina THA. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(12):3234–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Traina F, et al. Modular neck prostheses in DDH patients: 11-year results. J Orthop Sci. 2011;16(1):14–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Baek SH, et al. Do alumina matrix composite bearings decrease hip noises and bearing fractures at a minimum of 5 years after THA? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2015;473(12):3796–802.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  49. Hamilton WG, et al. Midterm results of delta ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2015;30(9 Suppl):110–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Hwang SK, et al. Fracture-dissociation of ceramic liner. Orthopedics. 2008;31(8):804.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Morlock MM, et al. Wear of a composite ceramic head caused by liner fracture. Orthopedics. 2014;37(7):e653–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Sharma V, et al. Revision total hip arthroplasty for ceramic head fracture: a long-term follow-up. J Arthroplast. 2010;25(3):342–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Walter WL, et al. Edge loading in third generation alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings: stripe wear. J Arthroplast. 2004;19(4):402–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Nevelos JE, et al. Comparative analysis of two different types of alumina-alumina hip prosthesis retrieved for aseptic loosening. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2001;83(4):598–603.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Nevelos J, et al. Microseparation of the centers of alumina-alumina artificial hip joints during simulator testing produces clinically relevant wear rates and patterns. J Arthroplast. 2000;15(6):793–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Walter WL, et al. Squeaking in ceramic-on-ceramic hips: the importance of acetabular component orientation. J Arthroplast. 2007;22(4):496–503.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Walter WL, et al. Retrieval analysis of squeaking alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(12):1597–601.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Esposito CI, et al. Wear in alumina-on-alumina ceramic total hip replacements: a retrieval analysis of edge loading. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012;94(7):901–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Sedel L, Walter WL, Pitto RP. Clinical faceoff: ceramic-on-ceramic THA: do the advantages outweigh the limitations? Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014;472(10):2927–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Cogan A, Nizard R, Sedel L. Occurrence of noise in alumina-on-alumina total hip arthroplasty. A survey on 284 consecutive hips. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2011;97(2):206–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Schroder D, et al. Ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty: incidence of instability and noise. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2011;469(2):437–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Owen D, et al. The natural history of ceramic-on-ceramic prosthetic hip squeak and its impact on patients. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2014;24(1):57–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Mai K, et al. Incidence of ‘squeaking’ after ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2010;468(2):413–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Walter WL, et al. Squeaking hips. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008;90(Suppl 4):102–11.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  65. Levy YD, et al. Review on squeaking hips. World J Orthop. 2015;6(10):812–20.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  66. Owen DH, et al. An estimation of the incidence of squeaking and revision surgery for squeaking in ceramic-on-ceramic total hip replacement: a meta-analysis and report from the Australian Orthopaedic Association National Joint Registry. Bone Joint J. 2014;96-B(2):181–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. UK National Joint Registry Annual Report. http://www.njrcentre.org.uk/njrcentre/Reports,PublicationsandMinutes/Annualreports/tabid/86/Default.aspx,2014.

  68. Lehil MS, Bozic KJ. Trends in total hip arthroplasty implant utilization in the United States. J Arthroplast. 2014;29(10):1915–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Sexton SA, et al. The role of patient factors and implant position in squeaking of ceramic-on-ceramic total hip replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2011;93(4):439–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Su EP. Ceramic-ceramic bearing: too unpredictable to use it regularly. HSS J. 2012;8(3):287–90.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  71. Walter WL, Yeung E, Esposito C. A review of squeaking hips. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2010;18(6):319–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Taylor S, Manley MT, Sutton K. The role of stripe wear in causing acoustic emissions from alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings. J Arthroplast. 2007;22(7 Suppl 3):47–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  73. Jarrett CA, et al. The squeaking hip: a phenomenon of ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009;91(6):1344–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Keurentjes JC, et al. High incidence of squeaking in THAs with alumina ceramic-on-ceramic bearings. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2008;466(6):1438–43.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  75. Restrepo C, et al. The noisy ceramic hip: is component malpositioning the cause? J Arthroplast. 2008;23(5):643–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Restrepo C, et al. The effect of stem design on the prevalence of squeaking following ceramic-on-ceramic bearing total hip arthroplasty. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2010;92(3):550–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Fan N, et al. The influence of stem design on critical squeaking friction with ceramic bearings. J Orthop Res. 2013;31(10):1627–32.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. McDonnell SM, et al. The incidence of noise generation arising from the large-diameter Delta motion ceramic total hip bearing. Bone Joint J. 2013;95-B(2):160–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Tai SM, et al. Squeaking in large diameter ceramic-on-ceramic bearings in total hip arthroplasty. J Arthroplast. 2015;30(2):282–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  80. Stanat SJ, Capozzi JD. Squeaking in third- and fourth-generation ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty: meta-analysis and systematic review. J Arthroplast. 2012;27(3):445–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  81. Sariali E, Klouche S, Mamoudy P. Ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty: is squeaking related to an inaccurate three-dimensional hip anatomy reconstruction? Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2014;100(4):437–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Wang W, et al. Fourth-generation ceramic-on-ceramic total hip arthroplasty in patients of 55 years or younger: short-term results and complications analysis. Chin Med J. 2014;127(12):2310–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgment

The authors would like to thank Selin Munir PhD, for her scientific input and help in preparation of this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yadin David Levy MD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing AG

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Levy, Y.D., Walter, W.L. (2017). Complications of Ceramic-on-Ceramic Bearings: Fracture, Stripe Wear, and Squeaking. In: Abdel, M., Della Valle, C. (eds) Complications after Primary Total Hip Arthroplasty. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54913-2_14

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-54913-2_14

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-54911-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-54913-2

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics