The Effects of a Changing World of Work on Daily Working Life

Chapter

Abstract

This book chapter explores how changes in work environments due to societal, economic, and technological changemay affect day-level within-person processes of action regulation, cognitive appraisal, and motivation. First, short overviews of action regulation theory (e.g., Frese and Zapf 1994), cognitive appraisal theories (e.g., Lazarus and Folkman 1984), and self-determination theory (Ryan and Deci 2000) are given and results of empirical diary studies based on these theories are discussed. On the basis of these theories, a framework model is presented that integrates action regulationprocesses, cognitive appraisal processes, and motivation processes in daily working life by focusing on their effects on self-control effort and learning at work. Next, possible effects of changing work environments on day-level within-person processes are discussed on the basis of this framework model. It is argued that although some changes in work environments may have mainly adverse effects (e.g., work intensification), many changes hold the potential for both adverse and beneficial effects (e.g., flexible working). Based on the assumed potentially ambivalent consequences of changes in working conditions, implications for organizations and practitioners are discussed.

Keywords

Changing work environments Within-person processes Action regulation Self-regulation Cognitive appraisal Challenge-hindrance Self-determination Motivation Self-control effort Learning at work Thriving at work 

References

  1. Albrecht, S. L. (2015). Challenge demands, hindrance demands, and psychological need satisfaction. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 14, 70–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bakker, A. B., & Demerouti, E. (2007). The job demands-resources model: State of the art. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 22, 309–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baumeister, R. F., Vohs, K. D., & Tice, D. M. (2007). The strength model of self-control. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 16, 351–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bolger, N., Davis, A., & Rafaeli, E. (2003). Diary methods: Capturing life as it is lived. Annual Review of Psychology, 54, 579–616.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Cascio, W. F. (1995). Whither industrial and organizational psychology in a changing world of work? American Psychologist, 50, 928–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cavanaugh, M. A., Boswell, W. R., Roehling, M. V., & Boudreau, J. W. (2000). An empirical examination of self-reported work stress among US managers. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85, 65–74.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Crawford, E. R., LePine, J. A., & Rich, B. L. (2010). Linking job demands and resources to employee engagement and burnout: A theoretical extension and meta-analytic test. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95, 834–848.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Diestel, S., & Schmidt, K.-H. (2012). Lagged mediator effects of self-control demands on psychological strain and absenteeism. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85, 556–578.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fisher, C. D., & To, M. L. (2012). Using experience sampling methodology in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 865–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fredrickson, B. L. (2001). The role of positive emotions in positive psychology: The broaden-and-build theory of positive emotions. American Psychologist, 56, 218−226.Google Scholar
  11. Frese, M., & Zapf, D. (1994). Action as the core of work psychology: A German approach. In H. C. Triandis, M. D. Dunnette, & L. M. Hough (Eds.), Handbook of industrial and organizational psychology (Vol. 4, pp. 271–340). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  12. Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self-determination theory and work motivation. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26, 331–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gerdenitsch, C., Kubicek, B., & Korunka, C. (2015). Control in flexible working arrangements: When freedom becomes duty. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 14, 61–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Glaser, J., Seubert, C., Hornung, S., & Herbig, B. (2015). The impact of learning demands, work-related resources, and job stressors on creative performance and health. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 14, 37–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hacker, W. (2003). Action regulation theory: A practical tool for the design of modern work processes? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 12, 105–130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hackman, J. R. (1970). Tasks and task performance in research on stress. In J. E. McGrath (Ed.), Social and psychological factors in stress (pp. 202–237). New York, NY: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.Google Scholar
  17. Hagger, M. S., Wood, C., Stiff, C., & Chatzisarantis, N. L. (2010). Ego depletion and the strength model of self-control: A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 136, 495–525.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Ilies, R., Aw, S. S., & Lim, V. K. (2016). A naturalistic multilevel framework for studying transient and chronic effects of psychosocial work stressors on employee health and well-being. Applied Psychology, 65, 223–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ilies, R., Aw, S. S., & Pluut, H. (2015). Intraindividual models of employee well-being: What have we learned and where do we go from here? European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24, 827–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kubicek, B., Paškvan, M., & Korunka, C. (2015). Development and validation of an instrument for assessing job stressors arising from accelerated change. The intensification of job demands Scale (IDS). European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 24, 898–913.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kühnel, J., Bledow, R., & Feuerhahn, N. (2016). When do you procrastinate? Sleep quality and social sleep lag jointly predict self-regulatory failure at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 37, 983–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Lazarus, R. S. (1995). Psychological stress in the workplace. In R. Crandall & P. L. Perrewé (Eds.), Occupational stress: A handbook (pp. 3–19). Washington, DC: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  23. Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
  24. LePine, J. A., Podsakoff, N. P., & LePine, M. A. (2005). A meta-analytic test of the challenge stressor–hindrance stressor framework: An explanation for inconsistent relationships among stressors and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 764–775.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mackey, J. D., & Perrewé, P. L. (2014). The AAA (appraisals, attributions, adaptation) model of job stress: The critical role of self-regulation. Organizational Psychology Review, 4, 258–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McEwen, B. S. (2007). Physiology and neurobiology of stress and adaptation: Central role of the brain. Physiological Reviews, 87, 873–904.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Ohly, S., & Fritz, C. (2010). Work characteristics, challenge appraisal, creativity, and proactive behavior: A multi-level study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 543–565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ohly, S., Sonnentag, S., Niessen, C., & Zapf, D. (2010). Diary studies in organizational research: An introduction and some practical recommendations. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 9, 79–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Parker, S. K., Bindl, U. K., & Strauss, K. (2010). Making things happen: A model of proactive motivation. Journal of Management, 36, 827–856.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Paškvan, M., Kubicek, B., Prem, R., & Korunka, C. (2016). Cognitive appraisal of work intensification. International Journal of Stress Management, 23, 124–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Porath, C., Spreitzer, G., Gibson, C., & Garnett, F. G. (2012). Thriving at work: Toward its measurement, construct validation, and theoretical refinement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33, 250–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Prem, R., Kubicek, B., Diestel, S., & Korunka, C. (2016). Regulatory job stressors and their within-person relationships with ego depletion: The roles of state anxiety, self-control effort, and job autonomy. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 92, 22–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Prem, R., Ohly, S., Kubicek, B., & Korunka, C. (2017). Thriving on challenge stressors? Exploring time pressure and learning demands as antecedents of thriving at work. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 38, 108–123.Google Scholar
  34. Rivkin, W., Diestel, S., & Schmidt, K. H. (2015). Affective commitment as a moderator of the adverse relationships between day-specific self-control demands and psychological well-being. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 88, 185–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rosa, H. (2003). Social acceleration: Ethical and political consequences of a desynchronized high–speed society. Constellations, 10, 3–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Rosa, H. (2013). Social acceleration: A new theory of modernity. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Searle, B. J., & Auton, J. C. (2015). The merits of measuring challenge and hindrance appraisals. Anxiety, Stress, & Coping, 28, 121–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Sonnentag, S. (2001). Work, recovery activities, and individual well-being: A diary study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 6, 196–210.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Sonnentag, S., & Bayer, U. V. (2005). Switching off mentally: Predictors and consequences of psychological detachment from work during off-job time. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 10, 393–414.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Sonnentag, S., & Fritz, C. (2007). The Recovery Experience Questionnaire: Development and validation of a measure for assessing recuperation and unwinding from work. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 12, 204–221.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Sonnentag, S., & Fritz, C. (2015). Recovery from job stress: The stressor-detachment model as an integrative framework. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 36, S72–S103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Spreitzer, G. M., & Porath, C. (2014). Self-determination as nutriment for thriving: Building an integrative model of human growth at work. In M. Gagné (Ed.), Oxford handbook of work engagement, motivation, and self-determination theory (pp. 245–258). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  44. Spreitzer, G., Porath, C. L., & Gibson, C. B. (2012). Toward human sustainability: How to enable more thriving at work. Organizational Dynamics, 41, 155–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Spreitzer, G., Sutcliffe, K., Dutton, J., Sonenshein, S., & Grant, A. M. (2005). A socially embedded model of thriving at work. Organization Science, 16, 537–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Trépanier, S. G., Forest, J., Fernet, C., & Austin, S. (2015). On the psychological and motivational processes linking job characteristics to employee functioning: Insights from self-determination theory. Work & Stress, 29, 286–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tuckey, M. R., Searle, B. J., Boyd, C. M., Winefield, A. H., & Winefield, H. R. (2015). Hindrances are not threats: Advancing the multidimensionality of work stress. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 20, 131–147.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Van den Broeck, A., De Cuyper, N., De Witte, H., & Vansteenkiste, M. (2010). Not all job demands are equal: Differentiating job hindrances and job challenges in the job demands-resources model. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19, 735–759.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Van den Broeck, A., Vansteenkiste, M., De Witte, H., & Lens, W. (2008). Explaining the relationships between job characteristics, burnout, and engagement: The role of basic psychological need satisfaction. Work & Stress, 22, 277–294.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Van den Broeck, A., Sulea, C., Vander Elst, T., Fischmann, G., Iliescu, D., & De Witte, H. (2014). The mediating role of psychological needs in the relation between qualitative job insecurity and counterproductive work behavior. Career Development International, 19, 526–547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Van Hooff, M. L. M., & Geurts, S. A. E. (2015). Need satisfaction and employees’ recovery state at work: A daily diary study. Journal of Occupational Health Psychology, 20, 377–387.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Vander Elst, T., Van den Broeck, A., De Witte, H., & De Cuyper, N. (2012). The mediating role of frustration of psychological needs in the relationship between job insecurity and work-related well-being. Work & Stress, 26, 252–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Webster, J. R., Beehr, T. A., & Love, K. (2011). Extending the challenge-hindrance model of occupational stress: The role of appraisal. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 79, 505–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zapf, D. (2002). Emotion work and psychological well-being: A review of the literature and some conceptual considerations. Human Resource Management Review, 12, 237–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of PsychologyUniversity of ViennaViennaAustria

Personalised recommendations