Theoretical Framing of Neuroethics: The Need for a Conceptual Approach

Chapter
Part of the Advances in Neuroethics book series (AIN)

Abstract

There are different dominant perspectives, theories, and methodologies within neuroethics, each importantly shaping the identification, understanding, and discussion of the relevant ethical, social, philosophical and scientific issues. In this chapter, we first provide a brief overview of current neuroethical approaches calling attention to a common tendency to underestimate the role and value of conceptual analysis. Against that background, we present and develop the theoretical framework of fundamental neuroethics. Next, we suggest that neuroethics should be built on the sound scientific and philosophical foundations of informed materialism. Finally, we apply the proposed theoretical framework to the neuroethical discussion of brain simulation.

Notes

Acknowledgments

This project has received funding from the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under grant agreement 720270(HBP SGA1).

References

  1. Avram M, Giordano J (2014) Neuroethics: some things old, some things new, some things borrowed...and to do. AJOB Neurosci 5(4):1–3Google Scholar
  2. Bachelard G (1953) Le matérialisme rationnel. Presses Universitaires de France, ParisGoogle Scholar
  3. Beauchamp T (1995) Principlism and its alleged competitors. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 5(3):181–199CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bickle J (2003) Philosophy and neuroscience: a ruthlessly reductive account. Kluwer Academic Publishers, DordrechtCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Changeux JP (2004) The physiology of truth. Belknap Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  6. Changeux JP, Courrège P, Danchin A (1973) A theory of the epigenesis of neuronal networks by selective stabilization of synapses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 70:2974–2978CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  7. Choudhury S, Slaby J (eds) (2012) Critical neuroscience. A handbook of the social and cultural contexts of neuroscience. Wiley, ChichesterGoogle Scholar
  8. Christen M, Biller-Andorno N, Bringedalb B, Grimesc K, Savulescu J, Walter H (2016) Ethical challenges of simulation-driven big neuroscience. Am J Bioeth Neurosci 7(1):5–17Google Scholar
  9. Clouser KD, Gert B (1990) A critique of principlism. J Med Philos 15(2):219–236CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Clouser KD (1995) Common morality as an alternative to principlism. Kennedy Inst Ethics J 5(3):219–237CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Crick F (1994) The astonishing hypothesis: the scientific search for the soul. Scribner, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  12. Cranford RE (1989) The neurologist as ethics consultant and as a member of the institutional ethics committee. Neurol Clin 7:697–713PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Churchland P (2008) The impact of neuroscience on philosophy. Neuron 60(3):409–411CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. De Vos J, Pluth E (eds) (2016) Neuroscience and critique. Routledge, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Dehaene S, Kerszberg M, Changeux JP (1998) A neuronal model of a global workspace in effortful cognitive tasks. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 95:14529–14534CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  16. Dehaene S, Changeux JP (1989) A simple model of prefrontal cortex function in delayed-response tasks. J Cognitive Neurosc 1:244–261CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dehaene S, Changeux JP (1991) The Wisconsin card sorting test: theoretical analysis and modeling in a neuronal network. Cereb Cortex 1:62–79CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Dehaene S, Sergent C, Changeux JP (2003) A neuronal network model linking subjective reports and objective physiological data during conscious perception. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 100:8520–8525Google Scholar
  19. Denton DA (2005) Les émotions primordiales et l’éveil de la conscience. Éditions Flammarion, ParisGoogle Scholar
  20. Diderot D (1966) Eléments de Physiologie. Quote from Oeuvres complètes, Jules Assérat & dMaurice Tourneux (ed), 20 vol, Paris 1875–1877 (II-322)Google Scholar
  21. Edelman GM (1992) Bright air, brilliant fire: on the matter of the mind. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  22. Evers K (2005) Neuroethics: a philosophical challenge. Am J Bioeth 5(2):31–33CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Evers K (2007) Toward a philosophy for neuroethics. EMBO Rep, special issue on neuroscience and society 8:48–51Google Scholar
  24. Evers K (2009) Quand la matière s'éveille. Éditions Odile Jacob, ParisGoogle Scholar
  25. Evers K (2016) Can we be epigenetically proactive? In: Metzinger T, Windt JM (eds) Open mind: philosophy and the mind sciences in the 21st century. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 497–518Google Scholar
  26. Evers K, Changeux JP (2016) Proactive epigenesis and ethical innovation: a neuronal hypothesis for the genesis of ethical rules. EMBO RepGoogle Scholar
  27. Evers K, Sigman M (2013) Possibilities and limits of mind-reading: a neurophilosophical perspective. Conscious Cogn 22:887–897CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Farah MJ, Illes J, Cook-Deegan R, Gardner H, Kandel E, King P et al (2004) Neurocognitive enhancement: what can we do and what should we do? Nat Rev Neurosci 5:421–425Google Scholar
  29. Farah MJ, Helberlein AS (2007) Personhood and neuroscience: naturalizing or nihilating? Am J Bioeth 7(1):37–48Google Scholar
  30. Farah MJ (2010) Neuroethics: an introduction with readings, 1st edn. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  31. Farisco M, Evers K, Salles A (2016) Big science, brain simulation and neuroethics. Am J Bioeth Neurosci 7:28–30Google Scholar
  32. Farisco M, Hellgren Kotaleski J, Evers K (In preparation) Mirroring the conscious brain? A conceptual investigation of brain models and simulationsGoogle Scholar
  33. Fins J (2008) A leg to stand on: Sir William Osler and Wilder Penfield’s “neuroethics”. Am J Bioeth 8:37–46CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Frazzetto G, Anker S (2009) Neuroculture. Nat Rev Neurosci 10:815–821CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Frackowiak R, Markram H (2015) The future of human cerebral cartography: a novel approach. Philos Trans R Soc Lond 370Google Scholar
  36. Giordano J (2011) Neuroethics: interacting “traditions” as a viable meta-ethics. AJOB Neuroscience 2(2):17–19Google Scholar
  37. Greene J (2008) The secret joke of Kant’s soul. In: Sinnott Armstrong W (ed) Moral psychology, vol 3. MIT Press, Cambridge, pp 35–80Google Scholar
  38. Illes J (2007) Empirical neuroethics. Can brain imaging visualize human thought? Why is neuroethics interested in such possibility? EMBO Report 8:S57–S60CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Ledoux J (1998) The emotional brain, Phoenix, UKGoogle Scholar
  40. Legrenzi P, Umiltà C (2011) Neuromania. On the limits of brain science. Oxford University Press, OxfordCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lagercrantz H (2005) I barnets hjärna, Bonnier Fakta, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  42. Levy N (2008) Introducing neuroethics. Neuroethics 1:1–8Google Scholar
  43. Levy N (2011) Neuroethics: a new way of doing ethics. AJOB Neurosci 2(2):3–9.Google Scholar
  44. Little M (1996) Why a feminist approach to bioethics? Kennedy Inst Ethics J 6(1):1–18CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Markram H (2013) Seven challenges for neuroscience. Funct Neurol 28:145–151PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  46. Mayer EA, Knight R, Mazmanian SK, Cryan JF, Tillisch K (2014) Gut microbes and the brain: paradigm shift in neuroscience. J Neurosci 34:15490–15496CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Moore GE (1903) Principia ethica. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  48. Northoff G (2009) What is neuroethics? Empirical and theoretical neuroethics. Curr Opin Psychiatry 22:565–569CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Northoff G (2014) Minding the brain: a guide to philosophy and neuroscience. Palgrave MacMillan, CroydonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Pontius AA (1973) Neuro ethics of “walking” in the newborn. Percept Mot Skills 37(1):235–245Google Scholar
  51. Racine E (2010) Pragmatic neuroethics. The MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  52. Rose S (2006) The future of the brain. Oxford University Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  53. Roskies A (2002) Neuroethics for the new millenium. Neuron 35:21–23CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Satel S, Lilienfeld SO (2013) Brainwashed: the seductive appeal of mindless neuroscience. Basic Books, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  55. Schultz W (2006) Behavioral theories and the neurophysiology of reward. Annu Rev Psychol 57:87–115CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Schultz W, Dayan P, Montague PR (1997) A neural substrate of prediction and reward. Science 275:1593–1599CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Shook J, Giordano J (2014) A principled and cosmopolitan neuroethics: considerations for international relevance. Philos Ethics Humanit Med 9(1):1–13CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Toulmin S (1982) How medicine saved the life of ethics. Perspect Biol Med 25(4):736–750CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  59. Wagner NF, Northoff G (2015) A fallacious jar? The peculiar relation between descriptive premises and normative conclusions in neuroethics. Theor Med Bioeth 36:215–235CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kathinka Evers
    • 1
  • Arleen Salles
    • 1
    • 2
  • Michele Farisco
    • 1
    • 3
  1. 1.Centre for Research Ethics and Bioethics (CRB), Uppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden
  2. 2.Neuroethics Program CIFBuenos AiresArgentina
  3. 3.Biogem Genetic Research CentreAriano Irpino (AV)Italy

Personalised recommendations