The Effect of Presentation in Online Advertising on Perceived Intrusiveness and Annoyance in Different Emotional States

  • Kaveh Bakhtiyari
  • Jürgen Ziegler
  • Hafizah Husain
Conference paper
Part of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science book series (LNCS, volume 10191)

Abstract

Online advertising is a rapidly growing area with high commercial relevance. This paper investigates the effect of different types of ad presentation, varying in frame size, position and animation level on visual intrusiveness and annoyance as perceived by users. Furthermore, we investigate the influence of users’ emotional states on perceived intrusiveness and annoyance. This research has been carried out through a survey study. The analysis of the data shows a linear correlation between the visual attention of the ads and its features. Also, a positive influence of emotion has been found on various types of ad presentations. In addition, the participants with emotions of positive valence and low arousal showed more tolerance to the same ad as the users with a different emotional state. This research proposes a new aspect in computational advertising to adapt the recommendations based on the user’s emotional state and the parameters of the online advertisements.

Keywords

Online advertising Visual salience Annoyance Emotional influence Computational advertising Visual intrusiveness 

References

  1. 1.
    Rodgers, S., Thorson, E.: The interactive advertising model: how users perceive and process online ads. J. Interact. Advert. 1, 41–60 (2000)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Hoffman, D., Novak, T.: Advertising pricing models for the World Wide Web. In: Hurley, D., Kahn, B., Varian, H., Cambridge, E. (eds.) Internet Publishing and Beyond: The Economics of Digital Information and Intellectual Property, p. 2. MIT Press, Cambridge (2000)Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Agarwal, A., Hosanagar, K., Smith, M.D.: Location, location, location: an analysis of profitability of position in online advertising markets. J. Market. Res. 48, 1057–1073 (2011)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    McCoy, S., Everard, A., Polak, P., Galletta, D.F.: An experimental study of antecedents and consequences of online ad intrusiveness. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact. 24, 672–699 (2008)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lin, Y.-L., Chen, Y.-W.: Effects of ad types, positions, animation lengths, and exposure times on the click-through rate of animated online advertisings. Comput. Ind. Eng. 57, 580–591 (2009)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Lohtia, R., Donthu, N., Hershberger, E.K.: The impact of content and design elements on banner advertising click-through rates. J. Advert. Res. 43, 410–418 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Petrovici, I.: Aspects of symbolic communications in online advertising. Proc. Soc. Behav. Sci. 149, 719–723 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Meyers-Levy, J., Malaviya, P.: Consumers’ processing of persuasive advertisements: an integrative framework of persuasion theories. J. Market. 63, 45–60 (1999)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Petty, R.E., Cacioppo, J.T.: Communication and Persuasion: Central and Peripheral Routes to Attitude Change. Springer, New York (1986)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Krishnamurthy, S.: Deciphering the internet advertising puzzle. Market. Manage. 9, 35–39 (2000)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Mullaney, T.J.: Online Marketing is Clicking. Business Week, New York (1999)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Holbrook, M.B., Batra, R.: Assessing the role of emotions as mediators of consumer responses to advertising. J. Consum. Res. 14, 404–420 (1987)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Lambert, D.R., Morris, M.H., Pitt, L.F.: Has industrial advertising become consumerized? a longitudinal perspective from the USA. Int. J. Advert. 14, 349–364 (1995)Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Brown, S.P., Stayman, D.M.: Antecedents and consequences of attitude toward the ad, a meta-analysis. J. Consum. Res. 19, 34–51 (1992)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Reed, M.: Going beyond the banner ad. Marketing 29, 25–26 (1999)Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    McCoy, S., Everard, A., Polak, P., Galletta, D.F.: The effects of online advertising. Commun. ACM 50, 84–88 (2007)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Danaher, P.J., Mullarkey, G.W.: Factors affecting online advertising recall: a study of students. J. Advert. Res. 43, 252–267 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Rettie, R.: An exploration of flow during Internet use. Internet Res. Electron. Netw. Appl. Policy 11, 103–113 (2001)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kuisma, J., Simola, J., Uusitalo, L., Öörni, A.: The effects of animation and format on the perception and memory of online advertising. J. Interact. Mark. 24, 269–282 (2010)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Desmet, P., Vastenburg, M., Van Bel, D., Romero Herrera, N.: Pick-A-Mood; development and application of a pictorial mood-reporting instrument. In: Out of Control: Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Design and Emotion, London, UK, 11–14 September 2012 (2012)Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Hartel, C.E.J., Ashkanasy, N.M., Zerbe, W.J.: Functionality, Intentionality and Morality. Elsevier, New York (2007)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Watson, D., Clark, L.A., Tellegen, A.: Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 54, 1063–1070 (1988)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Bakhtiyari, K., Husain, H.: Fuzzy model of dominance emotions in affective computing. J. Neural Comput. Appl. 25, 1467–1477 (2014)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Wolin, L.D., Korgaonkar, P.: Web advertising: gender differences in beliefs, attitudes and behavior. Internet Res. 13, 375–385 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Bakhtiyari, K., Taghavi, M., Husain, H.: Hybrid affective computing—keyboard, mouse and touch screen: from review to experiment. J. Neural Comput. Appl. 26, 1277–1296 (2015)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Bakhtiyari, K., Taghavi, M., Husain, H.: Implementation of Emotional-Aware Computer Systems Using Typical Input Devices. In: Nguyen, N.T., Attachoo, B., Trawiński, B., Somboonviwat, K. (eds.) ACIIDS 2014. LNCS (LNAI), vol. 8397, pp. 364–374. Springer, Heidelberg (2014). doi:10.1007/978-3-319-05476-6_37 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Kaveh Bakhtiyari
    • 1
    • 2
  • Jürgen Ziegler
    • 1
  • Hafizah Husain
    • 2
  1. 1.Interactive Systems, Department of Computer and Cognitive Science, Faculty of EngineeringUniversity of Duisburg-EssenDuisburgGermany
  2. 2.Department of Electrical, Electronics, and System EngineeringUniversiti Kebangsaan Malaysia (The National University of Malaysia)BangiMalaysia

Personalised recommendations