Advertisement

Robot Assisted Partial Pancreatectomy and Duodenopancreatectomy

  • Ugo BoggiEmail author
  • Carlo Lombardo
Chapter

Abstract

Laparoscopy has revolutionized surgery, by showing that many abdominal operations can be performed safely and effectively despite minimally invasive access. Patients’ demand for minimally invasive surgery, on one hand, and surgeons’ motivation to pursue innovation and accept challenge, on the other, did the rest making laparoscopy an essential component of modern surgery. Laparoscopy, however, has intrinsic limitations, that are not completely overcome by expertise. These limitations have made the outcome of laparoscopy highly operator dependent [2], and have restricted the range of complex operations that can be safely performed using this technique [3].

Keywords

Robot da Vinci Pancreatoduodenectomy Pancreatectomy Laparoscopy 

Supplementary material

Video 25.1

Robot assisted duodenopancreatectomy (MP4 150526 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Bonrath EM, Zevin B, Dedy NJ, Grantcharov TP. Error rating tool to identify and analyse technical errors and events in laparoscopic surgery. Br J Surg. 2013;100:1080–8. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9168.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Boggi U, Signori S, De Lio N, Perrone VG, Vistoli F, Belluomini M, Cappelli C, Amorese G, Mosca F. Feasibility of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Br J Surg. 2013;100:917–25. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9135.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Stark M, Pomati S, D’Ambrosio A, Giraudi F, Gidaro S. A new telesurgical platform – preliminary clinical results. Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol. 2015;24:31–6. doi: 10.3109/13645706.2014.1003945.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Leal Ghezzi T, Campos CO. 30 Years of robotic surgery. World J Surg. 2016; doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3543-9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Freschi C, Ferrari V, Melfi F, Ferrari M, Mosca F, Cuschieri A. Technical review of the da Vinci surgical telemanipulator. Int J Med Robot. 2013;9:396–406. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1468.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Turchetti G, Palla I, Pierotti F, Cuschieri A. Economic evaluation of da Vinci-assisted robotic surgery: a systematic review. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:598–606. doi: 10.1007/s00464-011-1936-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Boggi U, Napoli N, Costa F, Kauffmann EF, Menonna F, Iacopi S, Vistoli F, Amorese G. Robotic-assisted pancreatic resections. World J Surg. 2016; doi: 10.1007/s00268-016-3565-3.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Szold A, Bergamaschi R, Broeders I, Dankelman J, Forgione A, Langø T, Melzer A, Mintz Y, Morales-Conde S, Rhodes M, Satava R, Tang CN, Vilallonga R, European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons. European Association of Endoscopic Surgeons (EAES) consensus statement on the use of robotics in general surgery. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:253–88. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3916-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Napoli N, Kauffmann EF, Perrone VG, Miccoli M, Brozzetti S, Boggi U. The learning curve in robotic distal pancreatectomy. Updat Surg. 2015;67:257–64. doi: 10.1007/s13304-015-0299-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Napoli N, Kauffmann EF, Palmeri M, Miccoli M, Costa F, Vistoli F, Amorese G, Boggi U. The learning curve in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy. Dig Surg. 2016;33:299–307. doi: 10.1159/000445015.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Boone BA, Zenati M, Hogg ME, Steve J, Moser AJ, Bartlett DL, Zeh HJ, Zureikat AH. Assessment of quality outcomes for robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy: identification of the learning curve. JAMA Surg. 2015;150:416–22. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2015.17.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Napoli N, Kauffmann EF, Menonna F, Perrone VG, Brozzetti S, Boggi U. Indications, technique, and results of robotic pancreatoduodenectomy. Updat Surg. 2016;68(3):295–305. doi: 10.1007/s13304-016-0387-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kauffmann EF, Napoli N, Menonna F, Vistoli F, Amorese G, Campani D, Pollina LE, Funel N, Cappelli C, Caramella D, Boggi U. Robotic pancreatoduodenectomy with vascular resection. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2016;401(8):1111–22. doi: 10.1007/s00423-016-1499-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Boggi U, Amorese G, De Lio N, Perrone V, D’Imporzano S, Croce C, Vistoli F, Signori S, Cappelli C, Mosca F. Central pancreatectomy with inframesocolic pancreatojejunostomy. Langenbeck’s Arch Surg. 2012;397:1013–21. doi: 10.1007/s00423-011-0895-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Boggi U, Palladino S, Massimetti G, Vistoli F, Caniglia F, De Lio N, Perrone V, Barbarello L, Belluomini M, Signori S, Amorese G, Mosca F. Laparoscopic robot-assisted versus open total pancreatectomy: a case-matched study. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:1425–32. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3819-9.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Javed AA, Bagante F, Hruban RH, Weiss MJ, Makary MA, Hirose K, Cameron JL, Wolfgang CL, Fishman EK. Postoperative omental infarct after distal pancreatectomy: appearance, etiology management, and review of literature. J Gastrointest Surg. 2015;19:2028–37. doi: 10.1007/s11605-015-2920-2.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tol JA, Gouma DJ, Bassi C, Dervenis C, Montorsi M, Adham M, Andrén-Sandberg A, Asbun HJ, Bockhorn M, Büchler MW, Conlon KC, Fernández-Cruz L, Fingerhut A, Friess H, Hartwig W, Izbicki JR, Lillemoe KD, Milicevic MN, Neoptolemos JP, Shrikhande SV, Vollmer CM, Yeo CJ, Charnley RM, International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery. Definition of a standard lymphadenectomy in surgery for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: a consensus statement by the International Study Group on Pancreatic Surgery (ISGPS). Surgery. 2014;156:591–600. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2014.06.016.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Wright GP, Zureikat H. Development of minimally invasive pancreatic surgery: an evidence-based systematic review of laparoscopic versus robotic approaches. J Gastrointest Surg. 2016;20:1658–65. doi: 10.1007/s11605-016-3204-1.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Boggi U, Amorese G, Vistoli F, Caniglia F, De Lio N, Perrone V, Barbarello L, Belluomini M, Signori S, Mosca F. Laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic literature review. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:9–23. doi: 10.1007/s00464-014-3670-z.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zhou JY, Xin C, Mou YP, Xu XW, Zhang MZ, Zhou YC, Lu C, Chen RG. Robotic versus laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy: a meta-analysis of short-term outcomes. PLoS One. 2016;11:e0151189. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0151189.CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Liu R, Zhang T, Zhao ZM, Tan XL, Zhao GD, Zhang X, Xu Y. The surgical outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary neoplasms: a comparative study of a single center. Surg Endosc. 2016; doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5238-6.PubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Giulianotti PC, Sbrana F, Bianco FM, Elli EF, Shah G, Addeo P, Caravaglios G, Coratti A. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreatic surgery: single-surgeon experience. Surg Endosc. 2010;24:1646–57. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0825-4.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Narula VK, Mikami DJ, Melvin WS. Robotic and laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy: a hybrid approach. Pancreas. 2010;39:160–4. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3181bd604e.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Zhou NX, Chen JZ, Liu Q, Zhang X, Wang Z, Ren S, Chen XF. Outcomes of pancreatoduodenectomy with robotic surgery versus open surgery. Int J Med Robot. 2011;7:131–7. doi: 10.1002/rcs.380.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Chalikonda S, Aguilar-Saavedra JR, Walsh RM. Laparoscopic robotic-assisted pancreaticoduodenectomy: a case-matched comparison with open resection. Surg Endosc. 2012;26:2397–402. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2207-6.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lai EC, Yang GP, Tang CN. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pancreaticoduodenectomy versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy – a comparative study. Int J Surg. 2012;10:475–9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2012.06.003.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Zhan Q, Deng XX, Han B, Liu Q, Shen BY, Peng CH, Li HW. Robotic-assisted pancreatic resection: a report of 47 cases. Int J Med Robot. 2013;9:44–51. doi: 10.1002/rcs.1475.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Zureikat AH, Moser AJ, Boone BA, Bartlett DL, Zenati M, Zeh 3rd HJ. 250 Robotic pancreatic resections: safety and feasibility. Ann Surg. 2013;258:554–9. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3182a4e87c.PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Bao PQ, Mazirka PO, Watkins KT. Retrospective comparison of robot-assisted minimally invasive versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary neoplasms. J Gastrointest Surg. 2014;18:682–9. doi: 10.1007/s11605-013-2410-3.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Chen S, Chen JZ, Zhan Q, Deng XX, Shen BY, Peng CH, Li HW. Robot-assisted laparoscopic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: a prospective, matched, mid-term follow-up study. Surg Endosc. 2015;29:3698–711. doi: 10.1007/s00464-015-4140-y.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of General and Transplant SurgeryUniversity of PisaPisaItaly

Personalised recommendations