Energy Distribution in the Blast Fragmentation Process

Part of the Green Energy and Technology book series (GREEN)


The study of energy distribution in a blast fragmentation process is the subject of active research. The complexity of the phenomena and the high intensity and speed of some of the physical processes occurring during an explosion such as high pressures and temperatures make measuring of the energy distribution a very difficult task. Because of the limitation of current technologies to measure the actual energy released in an explosion, the assessment of energy distribution is done considering the balance between the ideal energy stored in the explosive and the effects of the released energy in the surrounding media. To study the ideal amount of energy in the explosive, it is necessary to use thermophysics and thermodynamic principles, while the effects in the surrounding media are explained using materials deformation theories, material fracture models, and dynamics. This chapter will review the basic principles behind the assessment of the ideal energy in the explosives and discuss the most accepted theories about the distribution of the energy in the surrounding media when an explosion takes place.


Explosive energy Fracture Vibration Detonation Blasting Fragmentation 


  1. 1.
    Brinkmann JR (1990) An experimental study of the effects of shock and gas penetration in blasting. In: The third international symposium for rock fragmentation by blasting, Brisbane, Australia, pp 55–66, 26–31 Aug 1990Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Calnan J (2015) Determination of explosive energy partition values in rock blasting through small-scale testing. Dissertation, University of Kentucky, Lexington, KYGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Cooper P (1996) Explosives engineering, VCH Publishers, Inc.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Döring W (1943) On detonation processes in gases. Ann Phys 43:421–436CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Elements of Armament Engineering, Part One, Sources of Energy (1964) Army material command engineering design handbook series, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Eremenko LE (1981) Interrelationship between density and structure in an explosive. Proceedings of the 11th Symp. on Explosives and Pyrotechnics, Philadelphia, PennsylvaniaGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Fickett W, Davis WC (2000) Detonation: theory and experiment. Dovere Publications, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Jouguet E (1905) On the propagation of chemical reaction in gases. J de Math Pures et Appl 347–425Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Oucterlony F, Nyberg U, Olsson M, Bergqvist I, Granlund L, Grind H (2004) The energy balance of production blast at Nordkalk’s Klinthagen quarry. Bergsprangningskommitten, StockholmGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Sanchidrian JA, Segarra P, Lopez LM (2007) Energy components in rock blasting. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 44:130–147, 154CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Sun C, Later DW, Chen G (2001) Analysis of the effect of borehole size on explosive energy loss in rock blasting. Int J Blast Frag 5(4):235–246Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    von Neumann J (1942) Theory of detonation waves, OSDR Report 549 (1942), reprinted in Collected Works 1963; vol 6, pp 203–218. Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Zeldovich YB (1940) On the theory of the propagation of detonation waves in gaseous system. Zh Eksp Teor Fiz 10:542–568Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Zhang Z (2016) Rock fracture and blasting: theory and applications, Elsevier IncGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Missouri S&TRollaUSA
  2. 2.University of KentuckyLexingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations