Advertisement

Drivers of Sustainable Value Management

  • Ayodeji E. Oke
  • Clinton O. Aigbavboa
Chapter

Abstract

There are many benefits of applying sustainable value management for construction projects but several barriers have also been identified. This chapter explains various means of improving the willingness to apply and employ a sustainable value management study for construction projects. Drivers highlighted and discussed include training and education, creating the necessary awareness, the involvement of stakeholders, and the formulation of the necessary and appropriate guidelines and regulations, among others. The drivers discussed in this chapter will help in promoting and adopting the study when properly considered and implemented accordingly.

Keywords

Construction project Research and development Training Stakeholder management Sustainable construction Sustainable value management Value management 

References

  1. Abidin, N. Z., & Pasquire, C. L. (2005). Delivering sustainability through value management: Concept and performance overview. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 2(2), 168–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aghimien, D. O., & Oke, A. E. (2015). Application of value management to selected construction projects in Nigeria. Developing Country Studies, 5(17), 8–14.Google Scholar
  3. AlSanad, S. (2015). Awareness, drivers, actions, and barriers of sustainable construction in Kuwait. Procedia Engineering, 118(2015), 969–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bowen, P., Jay, I., Cattell, K., & Edwards, P. (2010). Value management awareness and practice by South African architects: An empirical study. Construction Innovation, 10(2), 203–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chang, R., Soebarto, V., Zhao, Z., & Zillante, G. (2016). Facilitating the transition to sustainable construction: China’s policies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 131(2016), 534–544.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Jay, C. I., & Bowen, P. I. (2015). Value management and innovation: A historical perspective and review of the evidence. Journal of Engineering, Design and Technology, 13(1), 123–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Leung, M.-Y., & Yu, J. (2014). Value methodology in public engagement for construction development projects. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 4(1), 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Liu, G., & Shen, Q. (2005). Value management in China: current state and future prospect. Management Decision, 43(4), 603–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Male, S. (2002). A re-appraisal of value methodologies in construction. Construction Management and Economics, 11(2002), 57–75.Google Scholar
  10. Noor, N. F., Kamruzzaman, S. N., & Ghaffar, N. (2015). Sustainability concern in value management: A study on government’s building project. International Journal of Current research and Academic Review, 2(2015), 72–83.Google Scholar
  11. Perera, S., Hayles, C. S., & Kerlin, S. (2011). An analysis of value management in practice: The case of Northern Ireland’s construction industry. Journal of Financial Management of Property and Construction, 16(2), 94–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Roufechael, K. M., Abu Bakar, A. H., & Tabassi, A. A. (2015). Value management and client attitude in developing sustainable construction. Advances in Environmental Biology, 9(5), 4–6.Google Scholar
  13. Shen, G. Q., & Yu, A. T. (2012). Value management: Recent developments and way forward. Construction Innovation, 12(3), 264–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Shen, Q., & Liu, G. (2004). Applications of value management in the construction industry in China. Engineering, Construction and Architectural Management, 11(1), 9–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. The College of Estate Management. (1995). Value engineering. Retrieved May 12, 2016, from http://www.cem.ac.uk/postalcourses.

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Engineering and the Built EnvironmentUniversity of JohannesburgJohannesburgSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations