Critical Analysis on Access to and Location of Breast Implants
Plastic surgery for breast augmentation is the most common procedure in Brazil and the USA. Despite the different types of access and locations for the silicon implant, this chapter discuss the initial approach to your patient desiring breast augmentation and the aspects regarding the submuscular and subglandular location and the various access points: the inframammary fold, periareolar, and transaxillary. The measurements were made to ensure the best choice in the size of the prosthesis to achieve a better result after breast augmentation.
KeywordsBreast augmentation Mammary implant
The authors have no conflicts of interest.
The study received no financial support.
- American Society for Aesthetic Plastic Surgery (2016) Cosmetic Surgery National Data Bank Statistics. https://www.surgery.org/sites/default/files/ASAPS-Stats2016.pdf
- Binet A, Binet M (1951) In: Les régions génitales de la femme: seins, ventre, bassin, vulve, vagin, formes normales et malformations (4):152Google Scholar
- Conselho Federal de Medicina, 2004. https://www.portal.cfm.org.br/index.php
- Johnson M (2013) Breast implants: history, safety, and imaging. Radiol Technol 84:439–515Google Scholar
- Liu X, Zhou L, Pan F, Gao Y, Fan D (2015) Comparison of the postoperative incidence rate of capsular contracture among different breast implants: a cumulative meta-analysis. PLoS One 10(2):1–18Google Scholar
- Peters W, Fornasier V, Howasth D (2014) Late unilateral hematoma after breast augmentation. Plast Surg 22(1):18–21Google Scholar
- Rohrich RJ, Hartley W, Brown S (2006) Incidence of breast and chest wall asymmetry in breast augmentation: a retrospective analysis of 100 patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 111:1513–1519Google Scholar
- Souza SC (2008) Graduações de ptose mamária. Arquivos Catarinenses de Medicina 37(3):66–71Google Scholar