Advertisement

Breast Surgery pp 625-632 | Cite as

A Critical Analysis of Breast Implants

  • Wanda Elizabeth CorreaEmail author
  • Luis Bernardo Froes
Chapter

Abstract

51.1 Introduction

Keywords

Silicone breast implant Polyurethane-covered implant Textured implant Gel cohesivity Capsular contracture 

References

  1. Ashley FL (1970) A new type of breast prosthesis. Preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 45(5):421–424CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashley FL (1972) Further studies on the natural-Y breast prosthesis. Plast Reconstr Surg 49(4):414CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Berry MG, Davies DM (2010) Breast augmentation. I. A review of the silicone prosthesis. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 63(11):1761–1768CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Brandon HJ, Jerina KL, Wolf CJ et al (1999) Ultimate strength properties of control and explanted Silastic I and Silastic 0 silicone gel-filled breast implant shells. Aesth Surg J 19:381–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brody GS (2009) Breast implants, safety and efficacy of silicone. University of Southern California, CaliforniaGoogle Scholar
  6. Brown JB, Fryer MP, Randall P et al (1953) Silicones in plastic surgery: laboratory and clinical investigations, a preliminary report. Plast Reconstr Surg 12:374–376CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Correa WEM (2011) Implantes Mamários de Silicone. Cirurgia Plástica - Para a Formação do Especialista. Ed. Carreirão S. Editora Atheneu, Rio de Janeiro.Google Scholar
  8. Cronin TD, Gerow FJ (1963) Augmentation mammaplasty: a new “natural feel” prosthesis. Transactions of the 3rd international congress of plastic surgery. Excerpta Medica Foundation, Amsterdam, pp 41–49Google Scholar
  9. Embrey M, Adams E, Cunningham B, Peters W, Young L, Carlo GL (1999) A review of the literature on the etiology of capsular contracture and a pilot study to determine the outcome of capsular contracture interventions. Aesth Plast Surg 23:197–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Handel N et al (1995) The fate of breast implants: a critical analysis of complications and outcomes. Plast Reconstr Surg 96(7):1521–1533CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Herman S (1984) The Meme implant. Plast Reconstr Surg 73(3):411–414CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Hester TR Jr et al (1988) A 5-year experience with polyurethane-covered mammary prostheses for treatment of capsular contracture, primary augmentation mammoplasty, and breast reconstruction. Clin Plast Surg 15(4):569–585PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Marzoni FA, Upchurch SE, Lambert CJ (1959) An experimental study of silicone as a soft tissue substitute. Plast Reconstr Surg 24:600–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Moyer HR, Ghazi BH, Losken A (2012) The effect of silicone gel bleed on capsular contracture: a generational study. Plast Reconstr Surg 130(4):793–800CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Nahabedian MY (2007) Explantation of 41-year-old implants following primary breast augmentation. Ann Plast Surg 58(1):91–94CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Pitanguy I et al (1990) Implante de silicone gel com revestimento de poliuretano. Rev Bras Cir 80(2):119–130Google Scholar
  17. Pitanguy I, Salgado FS, Radwanski HN, Stersa RM (1991) Estágio atual dos implantes mamários. Rev Bras Cir 81(6):291–299Google Scholar
  18. Reidel, Bern (1994) História do silicone.Google Scholar
  19. Young VL, Watson ME (2001) Breast implant research “where we have been, where we are, where we need to go”. Clin Plast Surg 28(3):451–483PubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Ivo Pitanguy Plastic SurgeryPontifical Catholic UniversityRio de JaneiroBrazil
  2. 2.Faculty of MedicineUniversity of Sao PauloButantãBrazil

Personalised recommendations