Advertisement

The Changing Nature of Countryside and Farming: Towards a Socially Responsible Provision of Public Goods in Transition Economies

  • Lina PareigienėEmail author
  • Aldona Stalgienė
  • Rita Vilkė
Conference paper
Part of the Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics book series (EBES, volume 7)

Abstract

Needs and ways of managing natural resources in a sustainable and responsible way are under the scientific discussions for nearly three decades, since the environment was perceived as a public good. Major areas of concern range from environmental to social and ethical issues, which are close to corporate social responsibility (CSR) paradigm. This study examines the changing nature of countryside and farming from the Soviet period till nowadays, aiming to find out the main factors, which shape the trends of rural development in transition economies and compose the demand for socially responsible provision of public goods. Main objectives of the study are: to analyze common rural development features of Soviet period since 1990s; to define the key features of rural development in Lithuania as a country of transition just after the regained independence and in recent years, which affected the general provision of public goods and to project the main factors for its demand. Statistical data analysis, generalization, systematization and projection methods were applied. Research results show that the demographic and environmental issues are the top concerns, and these will probably form major groups of factors for the demand of socially responsible provision of public goods in the nearest future.

Keywords

Corporate social responsibility Farming Provision of public goods Transition economies Lithuania 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by a grant (No. MIP-098/2015) from the Research Council of Lithuania.

References

  1. Aleknavičius, A., & Aleknavičienė, V. (2000). Variation of Lithuania’s agrarian landscape in the period of 1950-1990 (In Lithuanian). Geodezija ir kartografija, 26(1), 35–38.Google Scholar
  2. Anusauskas, A. (2005). Lithuania 1940-1990 (In Lithuanian). Vilnius: The Genocide and Resistance Research Centre of Lithuania.Google Scholar
  3. Baločkaitė, R., & Rinkevičius, L. (2008). The turndown of Soviet modernity: From Chernobyl and Ignalina to the green movement and Sąjūdis (In Lithuanian). Sociologija Mintis ir Veiksmas, 2, 20–40.Google Scholar
  4. Becker, C., Mendelson, S. J., & Benderskaya, K. (2012). Russian urbanization in the Soviet and post-Soviet eras. London: International Institute for Environment and Development.Google Scholar
  5. Behling, A., & Auer, M. R. (2008). The European Union’s common agricultural policy and new member states: The example of reform and the economics of organic agriculture in Poland. European Union Center for Excellence, Indiana University. [online]. Accessed September 9, 2015, from http://www.indiana.edu/~eucenter/documents/EU_agricultural_policy_Poland.pdf
  6. Čiegis, R. (2009). Development of sustainable agriculture in Lithuania (In Lithuanian). Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure, 16(1), 30–37.Google Scholar
  7. Department of Statistics to the Government of the Republic of Lithuania. (1996). Agriculture in Lithuania 1995. Vilnius: Department of Statistics to the Government of the Republic of Lithuania.Google Scholar
  8. Department of Statistics to the Government of the Republic of Lithuania. (1997). Agriculture in Lithuania 1996. Vilnius: Department of Statistics to the Government of the Republic of Lithuania.Google Scholar
  9. Department of Statistics to the Government of the Republic of Lithuania. (1999). Agriculture in Lithuania 1998. Vilnius: Department of Statistics to the Government of the Republic of Lithuania.Google Scholar
  10. Environmental Protection Agency. (2008). Lithuania’s natutal environment, its conditions, processes and development (In Lithuanian). Vilnius: Petro ofsetas.Google Scholar
  11. European Network for Rural Development. (2010). Thematic working group 3: Public goods and public intervention. Final report. [online]. Accessed October 19, 2015, from http://enrd.ec.europa.eu/enrd-static/app_templates/enrd_assets/pdf/twg/ENRD_CP_TGW3.pdf
  12. Friedrich, N., Heyder, M., & Theuvsen, L. (2012). Sustainability management in agribusiness: Challenges, concepts, responsibilities and performance. International Journal on Food System Dynamics, 3(2), 123–135.Google Scholar
  13. Genier, C., Stamp, M., & Pfitzer, M. (2008). Corporate social responsibility in the agrifood sector: Harnessing innovation for sustainable development. Research report. FSG Social Impact Advisors, Rome.Google Scholar
  14. Gutkauskas, A. (1997). The reorganization of Lithuanian agriculture towards sustainable farming. Ambio, 26(7), 442–444.Google Scholar
  15. Hartmann, M. (2011). Corporate social responsibility in the food sector. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 38(3), 297–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hediger, W., & Knickel, K. (2009). Multifunctionality and sustainability of agriculture and rural areas: A welfare economics perspective. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 11(4), 291–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Heyder, M., & Theuvsen, L. (2008). Legitimating business activities using corporate social responsibility: Is there a need for CSR in agribusiness? In M. Fritz, U. Rickert, & G. Schiefer (Eds.), System dynamics and innovation in food networks (pp. 175–187). Bonn: ILB-Press.Google Scholar
  18. Heyder, M., & Theuvsen, L. (2009a). Corporate social responsibility in the agribusiness: A research framework. In German Association of Agricultural Economists, 48th Annual Conference “Risiken in der Agrar-und Ernahrunswirtschaft und ihre Bewaltigung”, Bonn, Germany, 24–26 September 2008. Munster: Vertieb Ausliefung und Gesamtherstellung.Google Scholar
  19. Heyder, M., & Theuvsen, L. (2009b). Corporate social responsibility in agribusiness: Empirical findings from Germany. 113th Seminar. Greece: European Association of Agricultural Economists.Google Scholar
  20. Heyder, M., & Theuvsen, L. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in the agri-food sector: The case of GMOs. Problems of World Agriculture/Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, 10(3), 15–32.Google Scholar
  21. Jasinskas, E., & Kazakevičius, Z. (2008). Inducement of sustainable development by supporting organic farms (In Lithuanian). Management Theory and Studies for Rural Business and Infrastructure, 13(2), 70–76.Google Scholar
  22. Jasinskas, E., & Simanavičienė, Ž. (2009). The influence of government’s support on social responsibility of farmers’ farms. Economics and Management, 14, 257–263.Google Scholar
  23. Jasinskas, E., & Simanavičienė, Ž. (2010). Production of genetically modified products and compatibility of enterprises social responsibility. Economics and Management, 15, 549–555.Google Scholar
  24. Jurkonis, N. (2012). Lanscape ecology (In Lithuanian). Kaunas: Vytauto Didžiojo universiteto Gamtos mokslų fakultetas.Google Scholar
  25. Kissinger, G. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and supply agreements in the private sector: Decreasing land and climate pressures. Working Paper No. 14, CCAFS.Google Scholar
  26. Kuliešis, G., 2015. Land stock (In Lithuanian). Agriculture and food sector in Lithuania 2014. Vilnius.Google Scholar
  27. Lerman, Z. (2001). Agriculture in transition economies: From common heritage to divergence. Agricultural Economics, 26(2), 95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lerman, Z., Kislev, Y., Biton, D., & Kriss, A. (2003). Agricultural output and productivity in the former Soviet Republics. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 51(4), 999–1018.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lerman, Z., Csaki, C., & Feder, G. (2004). Agriculture in transition: Land policies and evolving farm structures in post-Soviet countries. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
  30. Mačiulytė, J., Dedeire, M., & Prapiestienė, R. (2013). Rural communities and local development in the countryside of Lithuania (In Lithuanian). Geografija, 49(1), 69–81.Google Scholar
  31. Maloni, M. J., & Brown, M. E. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in the supply chain: An application in the food industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(1), 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Mazur-Wierzbicka, E. (2015). The application of corporate social responsibility in European agriculture. Miscellanea Geographica, 19(1), 19–23.Google Scholar
  33. Melnikienė, R., & Vidickienė, D. (2015). The role of systems and evolutionary approaches to agricultural and rural policy measures: Lessons from Lithuania. Еkonomika APK, 10, 73–82.Google Scholar
  34. Melnikienė, R., & Volkov, A. (2015). Achievements of agricultural and food sector in implementing the objectives of the CAP during the decade of Lithuanian’s membership in the EU (In Lithuanian). Agriculture and food sector in Lithuania 2014. Vilnius.Google Scholar
  35. Mincytė, D. (2011). Subsistence and sustainability in post-industrial Europe: the politics of small-scale farming in Europeanizing Lithuania. Sociologia Ruralis, 51(2), 101–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mueller, H., & Theuvsen, L. (2014). Influences on consumer attitudes towards CSR in agribusiness. Agricultural and Applied Economics Association. 2014 AAEA/EAAE/CAES Joint Symposium, No. 166108, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association and Canadian Agricultural Economics Society and European Association of Agricultural Economists.Google Scholar
  37. Narušytė, E. (2004). Education of farmers under SAPARD support field, Professional education.[online]. Accessed February 19, 2016, from https://zum.lrv.lt/lt/naujienos/zemdirbiu-mokymai-pagal-sapard-paramos-krypti-profesinis-mokymas
  38. Pečiulis, M. (2008). The economic situation in Soviet Lithuania in the 1950s-1960s (In Lithuanian). Laikas ir žodis, T1, 113–122.Google Scholar
  39. Poviliūnas, A. (2007). Economic peripeteia of land reform and peasantry development (In Lithuanian). Žemės ūkio mokslai, 14(1), 48–60.Google Scholar
  40. Poviliūnas, A. (2008). The returning of agriculture to market relations and the economic revival of farmers (In Lithuanian). Vilnius: Lietuvos agrarinės ekonomikos institutas.Google Scholar
  41. Poviliūnas, A. (2012). The agriculture as the source of vitality of rural areas (In Lithuanian). Žemės ūkio mokslai, 19(3), iii–xiii.Google Scholar
  42. Public agiency “Egoagros”. (2014). Annual report. [online]. Accessed March 5, 2016, from http://www.ekoagros.lt/uploads/file/2014%20m%20Veiklos%20ataskaita.pdf
  43. Ribokas, G., & Milius, J. (2008). Shifts of land use structure in North-East Lithuania after restoration of statehood (In Lithuanian). Annales Geographicae, 40(2), 38–49.Google Scholar
  44. Skulskis, V., Kairytė, E., & Zemeckis, R. (2006). Evaluation of factors encouraging organic farming (In Lithuanian). Žemės ūkio mokslai, 13(1), 55–61.Google Scholar
  45. Slee, W., & Thomson, K. J. (2011). Rural development policy and the provision of public goods: Challenges for evaluation. 122nd Seminar “Evidence-Based Agricultural and Rural Policy Making”, No. 99601 (pp. 1–14). European Association of Agricultural Economists.Google Scholar
  46. Tallontire, A., & Greenhalgh, P. (2005). Establishing corporate social responsibility drivers in agribusiness. Research report, Natural Resources Institute, UK.Google Scholar
  47. The Ministry of Agriculture of the Republic of Lithuania. (2007). Lithuanian rural development programme 2007–2013. [online]. Accessed February 18, 2016, from http://zum.lrv.lt/uploads/zum/documents/files/EN_versija/Information/Rural_development_programme_2007%20-%2020 13/Rural%20Development%20Programme%20for%20Lithuania%202007-2013%20(GENERAL%20PART).pdf
  48. Treinys, M. (2002). Multifunctionality of the activity in rural area and the function of the communities (In Lithuanian). Žemės ūkio mokslai, 4, 61–71.Google Scholar
  49. Treinys, M. (2005). Multifunctional rural development (In Lithuanian). Lietuvos kaimo raida. Vilnius, 2005, 5–12.Google Scholar
  50. Tuskenytė, V., & Volungevičius, J. (2015). Problem of environmental protection development in Lithuania (In Lithuanian). Geologija, 1(3), 105–115.Google Scholar
  51. Vasiljeviene, N., & Vasiljev, A. (2005). The roadmap: From Confrontation to nonsensus. In A. Habisch, J. Jonker, M. Wegner, & R. Schmidpeter (Eds.), Corporate social responsibility across Europe (pp. 183–193). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Vaznonis, B., & Startienė, G. (2009). Social responsibility aspects of agricultural externalities economical regulation. Economics and Management, 14, 335–344.Google Scholar
  53. Vinciūnienė, V., & Vitunskienė, V. (2013, November 28–29). Support for provision of agri-environmental public goods under agrienvironmental measures in Lithuania. In: Aleksandras Stulginskis University, 6th International Scientific Conference “Rural Development 2013”. Akademija, Lithuania. Akademija: Aleksandras Stulginskis University.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Lina Pareigienė
    • 1
    Email author
  • Aldona Stalgienė
    • 2
  • Rita Vilkė
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Rural DevelopmentLithuanian Institute of Agrarian EconomicsVilniusLithuania
  2. 2.Department of Farm and Enterprises EconomicsLithuanian Institute of Agrarian EconomicsVilniusLithuania

Personalised recommendations