Advertisement

Farmer’s Social Responsibility in Post-industrial Rural Development: A Challenge for the Twenty-First Century?

  • Rita VilkėEmail author
  • Lina Pareigienė
  • Aldona Stalgienė
Conference paper
Part of the Eurasian Studies in Business and Economics book series (EBES, volume 7)

Abstract

Post-industrial rural development as one of the major fields of public policy remains challenging in the twenty-first century. The bottom-up activity of society, that actively entered the process of rural policy in the past decade, accelerated several new discourses in field. By questioning the underlying support principles and justification of the public value, created by farmers that are subject to the support, the general public elucidated the existing gap between multifunctionality and sustainability in agriculture. Some insights had been proposed to close the gap with the help of corporate social responsibility (CSR). This entails to perform a study concerning farmer’s social responsibility from a broader rural development perspective. The aim of this study is to explain farmer’s social responsibility as a challenge for the twenty-first century, as well as possible conceptual framework for meeting transformations of post-industrial rural development. Research results show that using the systemic approach towards on-going transformations in post-industrial rural development, farmer’s social responsibility originates alongside multifunctionality, endogenous development, place-based approach and network conceptions in relationships and interactions among agricultural stakeholders throughout the local and global value chains, and thus make an impact on social welfare and inclusive economic development issues next to the broadly discussed environmental concerns.

Keywords

Farmer Corporate social responsibility Post-industrial rural development Multifunctional agriculture Endogenous development Place-based approach 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This research was funded by a grant (No. MIP-098/2015) from the Research Council of Lithuania.

References

  1. Aras, G., & Crowther, D. (Eds.). (2010). NGOs and social responsibility. Bingley, UK: Emerald Group Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  2. Barca, F., McCann, P., & Rodriguez-Pose, A. (2012). The case for regional development intervention: Place-based versus place-neutral approaches. Journal of Regional Science, 52(1), 134–152.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Behling, A., & Auer, M. R. (2008). The European Union’s common agricultural policy and new member states: The example of reform and the economics of organic agriculture in Poland. European Union Center for Excellence, Indiana University [online]. Accessed January 14, 2016, from https://euro.indiana.edu/doc/archive/working-papers/EUagriculturalpolicyPoland.pdf
  4. Beltratti, A. (2005). The complementarity between corporate governance and corporate social responsibility. Geneva Papers on Risk and Insurance—Issues and Practice, 30(3), 373–386.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). Business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Commission of the European Communities. (2001). Green paper promoting a European framework for corporate social responsibility (COM(2001) 366 final). Brussels: European Commission.Google Scholar
  7. Crowther, D., & Aras, G. (2008). Defining corporate social responsibility. Frederiksberg: Ventus.Google Scholar
  8. Dahlman, C. (2016). A new paradigm for rural development [online]. Accessed April 22, 2016, from http://oecdinsights.org/2016/03/31/a-new-paradigm-for-rural-development/
  9. De Dominicis, L. (2014). Inequality and growth in European regions: Towards a place-based approach. Spatial Economic Analysis, 9(2), 120–141.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Dwyer, J., Baldock, D., Caraveli, H., Einschutz, S., Petersen, J. E., Sumpsi-Vinas, J., & Valera-Ortega, C. (2000). The environmental impacts of irrigation in the European Union. Institute for European Environmental Policy, London in association with the Polytechnical University of Madrid and the University of Athens [online]. Accessed March 7, 2016, from http://ec.europa.eu/environment/agriculture/pdf/irrigation.pdf
  11. Elkington, J. (1994). Towards the sustainable corporation: Win-win-win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fraser, E. D. G., Dougill, A. J., Mabee, W. E., Reed, M., & McAlpine, P. (2006). Bottom up and top down: Analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management. Journal of Environmental Management, 78(2), 114–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Freeman, R. (1984). Strategic management. A stakeholders approach. London: Pitman.Google Scholar
  14. Friedrich, N., Heyder, M., & Theuvsen, L. (2012). Sustainability management in agribusiness: Challenges, concepts, responsibilities and performance. International Journal on Food System Dynamics, 3(2), 123–135.Google Scholar
  15. Genier, C., Stamp, M., & Pfitzer, M. (2008). Corporate social responsibility in the agrifood sector: Harnessing innovation for sustainable development. Research report. FSG Social Impact Advisors, Rome.Google Scholar
  16. Global Reporting Initiative. (2014). GRI G4 Guidelines and ISO 26000:2010. How to use the GRI G4 Guidelines and ISO 26000 in conjunction. Geneva: International Organization for Standartization (ISO) and Stichting Global Reporting Initiative (GRI) [online]. Accessed January 18, 2016, from http://www.iso.org/iso/iso-gri-26000_2014-01-28.pdf
  17. Hartmann, M. (2011). Corporate social responsibility in the food sector. European Review of Agricultural Economics, 38(3), 297–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Hediger, W. (2008). Agriculture’s multifunctionality, sustainability, and social responsibility. 82nd Annual Conference “Sustainability, and Social Responsibility”. Agricultural Economics Society (AES), Royal Agricultural College, UK.Google Scholar
  19. Hediger, W. (2010). Welfare and capital-theoretic foundations of corporate social responsibility and corporate sustainability. Journal of Socio-Economics, 39(4), 518–526.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hediger, W. (2013a). From multifunctionality to social responsibility—A paradigm shift [online]. Accessed February 13, 2016, from http://oega.boku.ac.at/fileadmin/user_upload/Tagung/2013/Short_Papers_2013/72-58_Hediger_SGA-OEGA_2013.pdf
  21. Hediger, W. (2013b). From multifunctionality and sustainability of agriculture to the social responsibility of the agri-food system. Yearbook of Socioeconomics in Agriculture, 6(1), 59–80.Google Scholar
  22. Hediger, W., & Knickel, K. (2009). Multifunctionality and sustainability of agriculture and rural areas: A welfare economics perspective. Journal of Environmental Policy and Planning, 11(4), 291–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Heyder, M., & Theuvsen, L. (2008a). Corporate social responsibility in the agribusiness: A research framework. Schriften der Gesellschaft für Wirtschafts-und Sozialwissenschaften des Landbaus eV Band 44 (pp. 265–277). Germany: German Association of Agricultural Economists (GEWISOLA).Google Scholar
  24. Heyder, M., & Theuvsen, L. (2008b). Legitimating business activities using corporate social responsibility: Is there a need for CSR in agribusiness? In M. Fritz, U. Rickert, & G. Schiefer (Eds.), System dynamics and innovation in food networks (pp. 175–187). Bonn: ILB-Press.Google Scholar
  25. Heyder, M., & Theuvsen, L. (2009). Corporate social responsibility in agribusiness: Empirical findings from Germany. 113th Seminar. Greece: European Association of Agricultural Economists.Google Scholar
  26. Heyder, M., & Theuvsen, L. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in the agri-food sector: The case of GMOs. Problems of World Agriculture/Problemy Rolnictwa Światowego, 10(3), 15–32.Google Scholar
  27. Kissinger, G. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and supply agreements in the private sector: Decreasing land and climate pressures. Working Paper. 14, CGIAR Research Program on Climate Change, Agriculture and Food Security, CCAFS.Google Scholar
  28. Leakey, R. (2012). Living with the trees of life: Towards the transformation of tropical agriculture. Wallingford: CABI.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. MacWilliams, A., & Siegel, D. (2001). Corporate social responsibility: A Theory of the Firm Perspective. Academy of Management Review, 26(1), 117–127.Google Scholar
  30. Maloni, M. J., & Brown, M. E. (2006). Corporate social responsibility in the supply chain: An application in the food industry. Journal of Business Ethics, 68(1), 35–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Margarian, A. (2013). A Constructive critique of the endogenous development approach in the European support of rural areas. Growth and Change, 44(1), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Martin-Retortillo, M., & Pinilla, V. (2015). Patterns and causes of growth of European agricultural production, 1950–2005. Agricultural History Review, 63(1), 132–159.Google Scholar
  33. Mazur-Wierzbicka, E. (2015). The application of corporate social responsibility in European agriculture. Miscellanea Geographica—Regional Studies on Development, 19(1), 19–23.Google Scholar
  34. Mueller, H., & Theuvsen, L. (2014). Influences on consumer attitudes towards CSR in agribusiness. Agricultural and Applied Economics Association. 2014 AAEA/EAAE/CAES Joint Symposium, No. 166108, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association and Canadian Agricultural Economics Society and European Association of Agricultural Economists.Google Scholar
  35. OECD. (2016). A new rural development paradigm for the 21st century: A toolkit for developing countries. OECD Development Centre Studies. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  36. Tallontire, A., & Greenhalgh, P. (2005). Establishing corporate social responsibility drivers in agribusiness. Research report. Natural Resources Institute, UK.Google Scholar
  37. Vidickiene, D., & Melnikiene, R. (2014). Rural policy evolution. Vilnius: Lithuanian Institute of Agrarian Economics.Google Scholar
  38. World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future (Brundtland Report). Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development [pdf]. United Nations. Accessed April 12, 2016, from http://www.un-documents.net/our-common-future.pdf

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing AG 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Rita Vilkė
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lina Pareigienė
    • 1
  • Aldona Stalgienė
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Rural DevelopmentLithuanian Institute of Agrarian EconomicsVilniusLithuania
  2. 2.Department of Farm and Enterprises EconomicsLithuanian Institute of Agrarian EconomicsVilniusLithuania

Personalised recommendations